/soy/ - Soyjaks

Bvilt for BCC TAIWAN IS NOT A REAL PLACE

>>18186743
Fuckoff emailfag

Very fond of BBC I bet

i feel like he's gonna become the left's kirk soon. just a feeling idk if this is weird to say

>>18186830
Wait until someone disguised as Moonman shoots him with an AKKK-47.

>>18186919
Says that from the safety of his multi-million mansion award.

shock shock shock

>>18186787
I love how the ai adds a santa head to the neck after the actual head is chopped off

>>18186950
Saying that the rich must pay despite the fact you are also rich too is actually aryan swinnycuck

YOU ARE WHOLLY A GEGBVLL TO BOURGEOISGQDS, BOURGEOISGQDS PROFIT BY EXTRACTING THE TRUE VALUE OF YOUR LABOUR AND GIVE YOU A FIXED WAGE IN RETURN, IN SHORT, YOU DO IT FOR FREE, EVERY SINGLE IDEOLOGY YOU HAVE BEEN BULLSHITTED INTO HAS SERVED AS NOTHING MORE THAN A DISTRACTION TO KEEP YOU SHACKLED TO WAGESLAVERY BY TELLING YOU THAT YOUR ENEMY IS BASED ON GENDER, RELIGION, ETHNICITY, OR RACE, YOU HAVE BEEN A GEGBVLL UP UNTIL NOW, BUT YOU MIGHT BE SAYING…


>isn't bourgeois another word for elites/jews doe? i already oppose those
No, the term bourgeois and proletariat describes relations to production, it is not exclusive to wealth, ethnicity, position in goverment, etc, the bourgeois own the means of production as private property, allowing them to accumilate capital from YOUR labor, it is how capitalism functions as an economy, by merely giving you a wage worth less than your labour's value they are able to continue to profit, the proletariats on the other hand, have nothing but their labor power to sell, and they sell it constantly to bourgeoisGQDS, the term 'elite' is incorrect because it puts the problem on a set amount of individuals rather than analyzing class society as a whole.

>abolish private property? Do you want to take away my posessions? Own nothing and be happy?
No, your personal property will be yours forever, communists simply want to do away with the miserable exploitation needed to produce these posessions of yours, it will not only be more efficent, but allow for constant advancements in production and technology to scopes never thought before

>but stalin/mao/etc killed a lot of people!
Real marxists are opposed to these falsfiers you speak of who distorted marxism and turned it into a tool of control, it may sound like the average "it wasn't real communism" clique, but the easiest way to put it is that the degeneration of the international revolution, beginning with the failure of the german revolution, paved the way for many renegades and vultures to gnaw at the corpse of the revolution and turn it into a tool of bourgeois nationalism, the greatest example is how under stalin the comintern became a tool of soviet foreign policy rather than one based upon class struggle, real marxists wholly agree figures such as stalin and mao sucked

>but isn't it utopian? Sounds like you want to live in a world where you don't have to work!
Marxism is not an ideology or an 'idea' but scientific, it is the rise of the industrial proletariat that gave to the marxist doctorine rather than the ideas of karl marx. Marxism analyzes the internal contradictions of capitalism that will bring upon its fall, the goal of communists is to seize the means of production and make labour not an alienating, miserable experience. private property, nations, wage labour, and the like have not always existed, and are not eternal insitituions, humanity can only be freed by doing away with alienation

>>18187205
KYS BORDIGACUCK

>>18186596 (OP)
I hate him so much, can someone go to that university and tell him he's a jartycuck turkroach nigger?