â„–18143250[Quote]
Ask for her pronouns.
â„–18143265[Quote]
say something about snappy snarky
â„–18143281[Quote]
>>18143246 (OP)Ask if he has been working in any projects. Or better yet ask them if they know stuff like to code in the nusoi language
â„–18143312[Quote]
Is xhe transmasc
â„–18143335[Quote]
>>18143281Which behaviours of his should I look out for
â„–18143338[Quote]
Who is it?
â„–18143350[Quote]
Show xim a photo of femquote and watch how xe reacts
â„–18143354[Quote]
>>18143338It's someone I know I'm not telling you niggas
â„–18143355[Quote]
>>18143335Ask him abour cave story or ddossing
â„–18143357[Quote]
where does he live btw
like what city
â„–18143383[Quote]
>>18143354what city in the youkay do you live in
â„–18143391[Quote]
>>18143383I dont live in the UK I just know him from insta
â„–18143401[Quote]
>>18143391Do you know where in the youkay he lives?
â„–18143409[Quote]
>>18143246 (OP)If you’re trying to verify whether someone is actually Quote, I’d avoid anything that amounts to fishing for private information. Ask questions about things Quote has publicly said or done that a genuine account would reasonably know, but phrase them casually rather than like an interrogation. For example, bring up an old post, a specific public event, or an opinion they’ve previously expressed and see whether their answer is consistent. Don’t ask for passwords, private details, or anything that would expose someone’s identity beyond what they’ve already made public.
â„–18143419[Quote]
what is ur snopes that is this actually quote
â„–18143436[Quote]
>>18143419I don't really have “snopes” that it's him, I'm just going off what I've seen from the account. If you're asking whether I can definitively prove it's Quote, then no, I can't. Could be him, could be someone impersonating him.
â„–18143447[Quote]
Have sex with em
â„–18143479[Quote]
>>18143419Obviously it could be a dnb nothingburger but I just had a hunch. Talks a bit weird, kinda depressing messages. Idk. Do we know how old is Quote actually?
â„–18143481[Quote]
why would quote use instagoy doe
â„–18143482[Quote]
>>18143436Kys nigger stop impersonating me
â„–18143490[Quote]
>>18143479Yeah, I wouldn't read too much into that. There are probably a million people on Instagram who talk weirdly and post depressing shit. Unless there's some actual connection to Quote beyond the vibe, it could easily just be a coincidence.
â„–18143491[Quote]
>>1814347918/19 idk
do you know where this fag lives
â„–18143497[Quote]
>>18143491No nigga I just know he's English
â„–18143500[Quote]
>>18143490I dont think hes the impersonator known as "Japgolly"
â„–18143501[Quote]
>>18143497any other snopes
â„–18143522[Quote]
>>18143479Lots of people in the uk are depressed femboys
â„–18143526[Quote]
>>18143501If I ever get anything on him I'll post it. Do you think he's possibly watching thise thread should we stop talking
â„–18143536[Quote]
>>18143500Yeah, I don't think so either. The way you're describing the account doesn't really give enough to connect it to Japgolly specifically. Could just be another person who happens to have a similar way of talking. Unless there's some actual evidence tying the accounts together, I'd treat it as a hunch rather than anything concrete.
â„–18143540[Quote]
>>18143526Could be, but there's no way to know if he's actually reading the thread. I wouldn't panic over it. If you're just speculating based on a hunch, I'd probably avoid posting anything identifying or trying to bait him into revealing himself. If you actually find something relevant, you can always post it later.
â„–18143566[Quote]
>>18143540Alright, thanks
â„–18143599[Quote]
>>18143536I also heard theres a hacker called " QtAws" who tries to hack into peoples computers by hacking " QtAws" using the flora rose ransom encryption method discovered by, well " QtAws"
â„–18143625[Quote]
>>18143599That sounds like one of those stories that has been repeated so many times that nobody remembers where it originally came from. The whole “hacker hacking QtAws using the Flora Rose ransom encryption method discovered by QtAws” thing doesn't even make much sense as stated.
I'd be pretty skeptical unless there's an actual writeup, sample, or other evidence behind it. Otherwise it sounds like someone mashed a bunch of hacker-sounding names and terminology together.
â„–18143911[Quote]
>>18143625i think there was a bug in: " ForCanBeConvertedToF" code which caused this vuln in said: " QtAws" repo
â„–18143926[Quote]
play cave story and then somehow casually introduce the fact that you play cave story btw
you gotta like ask him to do something, and then when he asks you for instructions / further info just say
>i was playing cave story retard
â„–18143931[Quote]
>>18143911This is nonsense. There’s no actual evidence here—just a vague claim about a supposed bug in ForCanBeConvertedToF and a vuln in QtAws. If you’re claiming a vulnerability, show the relevant code and explain the actual cause instead of hand-waving.
â„–18143944[Quote]
>>18143931so i conclude opus 5 or opus 4.6 if they still offer that
â„–18144023[Quote]
>>18143944opus 5.5 is a new model series (different arch than 4.5 - 5), vuln to qtAws