№17967389[Quote]
4chan
№17967404[Quote]
there was one but we dont talk about that one
№17967410[Quote]
>>17967404it was just mazal and his goons samefagging though
№17967411[Quote]
Frenschan did
№17967417[Quote]
>>17967380 (OP)Qa2triots.win
№17967472[Quote]
There was a hostile one that took our soyjak.party domain down, that's why we're using .st now, they're thankfully dead now
№17967479[Quote]
>>17967380 (OP)It's called the sharty
№17967489[Quote]
>>17967472Gee, I wonder how frogposters were able to avoid an outran ban in that era if Quote was banning things liberally
№17967539[Quote]
>>17967489>>17967526Frogs somehow manage to stay here despite laughing at us when something bad happens geg
№17967551[Quote]
>>17967513I was talking about the frog pond doe
№17967572[Quote]
>>17967526that czech fag used mobile data to spam cp though
№17968014[Quote]
samefag thread btw
№17968222[Quote]
The frogs didn't have any commentary behind them and were made to be self-inserts, so they quickly dissipitated into general 4chan culture. The frogs belonged to everybody, and hence to nobody (except people trolling /a/).
Meanwhile the soyjaks commented on soyboys/numales and started off being used as insults (soyquoting), which turned jakkers against other 4channers and split them into their own clique. This clique successfully separated into its own website because it already stood out from the crowd.
Also frenschan existed, was in the top 5 for the biggest altchans, and gave us >ohnononono kek nusoipoopas jsid, but it's dead.
№17968234[Quote]
Frogpong and frenschan raped to death btw
№17968255[Quote]
>>17968222Hey i got trips
№17968266[Quote]
It would immediately turn into a mass cp sharing ring.
№17968729[Quote]
>>17968266Frogribbits, is this true?
№17968755[Quote]
>>17967513frogfail propaganda