№17962576[Quote]
not zoophilia cause i said so
№17962592[Quote]
>ITT furfags will try to prove me that furry porn is somehow NOT zoophilia (IDs on because im trans btw, if that matters)
>
>>
No arrow. You therefore are effeminate men. Furfags still inferior to you.
№17962601[Quote]
>>17962592Meds, nigger, there is an arrow
№17962605[Quote]
>>17962601I forgot. I'm the one being retarded.
№17962629[Quote]
>>17962561 (OP)why do you think it's zoophilic
№17962647[Quote]
>>17962618It is zoophilia, nigger, they have fur and animal traits, they have heads of an animal, and you, retarded furnigger ,didnt even bother to prove otherwise, so you are a massive nigger
№17962651[Quote]
bait everybeidore falls for
№17962672[Quote]
>>17962629Why isn't it? Furfags goon to anthros which have animal traits (paws, ears, head of an animal) or sometimes just straight up to animals (DOCTOOOOOOOOOOS)
№17962674[Quote]
>>17962651Prove me otherwise, quotesissy
№17962694[Quote]
>>17962674i dont have any proof thats just my vocal stim
№17962703[Quote]
>>17962695oh nononononono furfagsissies…. What the fuck is this
№17962716[Quote]
>>17962672> Furfags goon to anthros which have animal traitsanimal traits =/= animals though
>or sometimes just straight up to animalsthen it isn't furry
№17962731[Quote]
>>17962716then I guess lolifags aren't attracted to children if its 1,000 years old but has child-like traits
№17962745[Quote]
>>17962716So if it isn't an animal and you like that it has human traits why wouldn't you just goon to humans? (In the best case scenario don't goon in general doe)
№17962768[Quote]
>>17962731Their bodies are the exact same as actual children, that's pedophilia.
>>17962745>why wouldn't you just goon to humans?I got EPI'd into it but I consider furfags separate from humans and animals, not an inbetween of both of them
№17962794[Quote]
>>17962745same vein as to why some people like cargirls
№17962798[Quote]
>>17962794catgirls not cargirls tf
№17962864[Quote]
>>17962832That's a paw fetish, how is that NOT zoophilia you fucking furfag nigger?
№17962869[Quote]
>>17962864>>17962768what do you think of my argument
№17962904[Quote]
>>17962869It's valid i think, but still how is paw fetish not considered zoophilia
№17963004[Quote]
>>17962904maybe like with catgirls, paws are considered the same 'accessory' like cat ears.
№17963185[Quote]
>>17962832i got a boner from the first pricel i think i will kill myself now
№17963235[Quote]
>>17962672humans have ears THOUGH. oh my god am i zoophile for having sex with a woman? doctos research this.
№17963267[Quote]
>>17963235I meant cat/dog/fox ears or whatever
№17963307[Quote]
>>17963267it's not even the same anatomy as an animal THOUGH
№17963331[Quote]
>>17963307depending on how the artist draws them. some draw them as digitigrade and some as plantigrade
№17963369[Quote]
>>17963331well that's bad and gay but if it's just a foid with a tail and ears i don't think the argument can really be made that it's zoophilia.
№17963419[Quote]
>>17963369but why would someone find animal tails and ears more attractive than the lack thereof
№17963457[Quote]
>>17963419because it's novel and humans tend to gawk at novelty
№17963459[Quote]
spamming with ids enabled is next level dedication
№17963487[Quote]
>>17963457hmm thats true. do you think someone would find three legs or whatever novel and thus attractive?
№17963503[Quote]
>>17963487yeah probably i mean there's people who find no legs novel
№17963527[Quote]
>>17963503this just reminded me of th nigga who goons to limbless torso anime girls
№17963557[Quote]
>>17963527oyyy i forgot about that nigga but yeah that kinda underlines the point. i do agree that the more like animalistic shit is unacceptable THOUGH
№17963685[Quote]
>>17962832im an antifurry but im so lonely that i would like to hug and cuddle every single one of them
№17963697[Quote]
ITT Amerimutts will try to beat China but China will win 🇨🇳
№17963843[Quote]
>>17962731there's a clear gap between jerking off to a cartoon that looks straight up like a kid and a cartoon that has animalistic features but is not an animal. in such a case, the equivalent of lolicon would be jerking off to a cartoon that looks straight up like an animal, like pokemon