This banner is coal so I will explain why.1) It's self-inserting as an effeminate man instead of Chudjak.2) It endorses Soylent. This misconception arises from that soulless bugmen only see soyjaks visually or semiotically and not hermeneutically lea

Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: Banner_187.png 📥︎ (56.85 KB, 600x200) ImgOps

Chud 09/20/26 (Sun) 04:46:37 №17962403 [Quote]

This banner is coal so I will explain why.

1) It's self-inserting as an effeminate man instead of Chudjak.
2) It endorses Soylent. This misconception arises from that soulless bugmen only see soyjaks visually or semiotically and not hermeneutically leading to unconscious sponsorship of Soylent instead of onions which increase testosterone levels. This is deeply troubling, as it means the average soyteen is only step above being a low IQ TikTok mind rape slave. This identification of purely visual attributes and not on an archetypal level leads to misconceptions like that HTSM is NAS because no stubble or glasses or something and marks a deeply soulless imageboard.
3) Jakking is over. It has been ruined.

>

Chud 09/20/26 (Sun) 04:47:14 №17962411 [Quote]

I agree but HTSM is NAS

Chud 09/20/26 (Sun) 04:48:10 №17962426 [Quote]

>>17962411
Explain

Chud 09/20/26 (Sun) 04:50:12 №17962454 [Quote]

Up.

Chud 09/20/26 (Sun) 04:50:48 №17962464 [Quote]

>>17962426
The only IAS aspects of HTSM are that it is used to mock, it is an aliased drawing and has some poorly visible facial hair but other than that it shares almost nothing in common with a classic soyjak from the late 2010s

Chud 09/20/26 (Sun) 04:51:28 №17962475 [Quote]

>>17962464
You are thinking on visual, not archetypal or unconscious or conceptual levels.

Chud 09/20/26 (Sun) 04:52:15 №17962488 [Quote]

>>17962464
Also, evolution happens or something.