№17773046[Quote]
who sexualized babyjak? give names
or else you're just making an excuse to normalize soylita
№17773053[Quote]
when has anyone ever sexualized babyjak nigga
№17773100[Quote]
>>17773053If you used the ru this year you would know
But the best example is Supreme obviously
№17773103[Quote]
>>17773064go back then you 'ru nigger pedophile
№17773105[Quote]
because it has lita in the name
№17773109[Quote]
>>17773072he is a diddy blud
№17773111[Quote]
sus thread
№17773250[Quote]
>>17773105>because it has lita in the nameyeah it makes sense
№17773287[Quote]
Shitlita isn't allowed because it is named after a pedophilic novel
№17773299[Quote]
>>17773062Does anyone have that video of that jewish soyboy in a chair making a bunch of weird faces and stuff? He looks a lot like doll.
№17773314[Quote]
>>17773287and also because it's based on a pedophilic meme by 4cuck called "stick-chan" and shitlita also has the color palette of the pedonigger flag
№17773322[Quote]
>>17773105>>17773287That's not why. Soylita was fine for a while because people were just using it as a 'jak to represent children in normal ways, but then pedotrannies started sexualizing it and started posting 'litas that were (allegedly) traced off of real 'p. Then it got banned.
№17773335[Quote]
>>17773322suspicious lita drawings were here in 2022 long before the soylita ban.
№17773341[Quote]
>>17773322Soylita porn was allowed until doll banned it
№17773343[Quote]
>>17773037 (OP)The difference is that:
1. Soylita has the word "lita" in it, which is derived from lolita, or loli.
2. The color pallet is literally the MAP flag (Minor Attracted Persons)
№17773351[Quote]
>>17773341Which is why Soot is one of the worst admins
№17773366[Quote]
>>17773343Hallucination, the colors for each item are the most common for each one, if the culture was such that they had no qualms naming it after lolita they wouldn't have felt the need to sneak in a pedophilic reference, and the shoyta color pallet cannot be made out to reference anything in this matter
№17773386[Quote]
>>17773366Nigger is actually attempting to defend soylita GGEEEGGG JSID
№17773392[Quote]
>>17773366Nigger, Shitlita's design is also meant to appeal to pedophiles since xhe has a oversized shirt which pedos like for some reason
>>17773383I agree
№17773435[Quote]
>>17773417>you niggerswhat makes you think it was us who did that
№17773440[Quote]
>>17773417Realistically that was probably an oldsoi posting 'lita porn
№17773488[Quote]
>>17773392>meant to appeal to pedophiles since xhe has a oversized shirt really nigga
№17773974[Quote]
>>17773889Would she still be banned if all 3 colors were different
№17773994[Quote]
>>17773889"the colors for each item are the most common for each one, if the culture was such that they had no qualms naming it after lolita they wouldn't have felt the need to sneak in a pedophilic reference, and the shoyta color pallet cannot be made out to reference anything in this matter"
The second image gives no source confirming the colors were actually derived in that manner, and
>>17773341 is me so the early use is not surprising or relevant
>>17773974 is also a good point, this is just a reach and irrelevant and plausibly well-poisoning
№17774007[Quote]
>>17773974Yes because xer design is meant to appeal to pedos
№17774027[Quote]
>>>17773889
>Would she still be banned if all 3 colors were different?
No, but that's not what we have in front of us. That's like saying "Well, he posted 'p, but would you have banned him if it wasn't depicting a child?"
№17774043[Quote]
>>17774027No nigger, she would still be banned if the three colors were different. Just how retarded are you? do you think a contrived connection to a niche pedophile community matters more than it being outwardly co-opted by pedophiles?
№17774097[Quote]
>>17774043The thing is that it was made from pedophiles for pedophiles, hence the color palette and its origins. Any sort of non-sexual messaging (like old SMVs) was entirely innocent and it was just using it as a placeholder for generic child character, but the character was made to have pedophilic messaging regardless.
№17774143[Quote]
>>17774097This is true but the color palette thing is still a reach
№17774336[Quote]
because soylita is inherently a pedo thing whereas babyjak is fine and was only twisted by pedos relatively recently, and even then they didn't succeed
this is really obvious and a retarded question, OP is retarded and retarded thread fuck you
№17774383[Quote]
dont make me bring out the teens gooning to soytan
№17774402[Quote]
>>17773037 (OP)Nusois…. are we serious rn?