[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/soy/ - Soyjaks

The Serious Boardβ„’ for feedback, suggestions, and metawhining
Catalog
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png πŸ“₯︎ (522.15 KB, 800x931) ImgOps

File: ClipboardImage.png πŸ“₯︎ (2.35 MB, 1600x2048) ImgOps

 β„–17765456[Quote]

OYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

 β„–17765465[Quote]

not noticable

 β„–17765467[Quote]

>doctoddlering over a Nirvana cover

 β„–17765484[Quote]

I remember when this album cover was posted during Froot era and the whole thread was just brapped up shitflinging

 β„–17765496[Quote]

>>17765467
it cant be 'p because there is nothing sexual about it

 β„–17765507[Quote]

It's just a baby nuswa

 β„–17765515[Quote]

its not 'p but you probably still would've posted if it was, it like the doctoddler you are

 β„–17765516[Quote]

>>17765496
nuswas are wired that way

 β„–17765528[Quote]


 β„–17765530[Quote]

File: 1741224497104i.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (37.55 KB, 644x800) ImgOps

>>17765456 (OP)
A hungry man thinks of bread…

 β„–17765535[Quote]

>>17765528
marge hes right.

 β„–17765559[Quote]

>>17765456 (OP)
retard

 β„–17765561[Quote]

>>17765456 (OP)
OP never saw a baby in his whole life

 β„–17765567[Quote]

>>17765535
What do you think tsmt means

 β„–17765578[Quote]

NIGGA YOU CANT SHOW NAKED BABIES THAT IS LITERALLY 'P

 β„–17765583[Quote]

The drowned a baby for an album cover?

 β„–17765589[Quote]

doctoddlering over a Nirvana cover
gigachad

 β„–17765592[Quote]

File: doctos.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (96.65 KB, 331x385) ImgOps

oyyyyyyyyyyyy

 β„–17765593[Quote]

>>17765578
if its not sexual it cannot be 'p
however if you think its sexual you might be a pedophile

 β„–17765598[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png πŸ“₯︎ (133.56 KB, 1000x1250) ImgOps


 β„–17765610[Quote]

>>>17765578 (You)
>if its not sexual it cannot be 'p
>however if you think its sexual you might be a pedophile

following your logic showing a naked child isnt sexual, kys pedo

 β„–17765621[Quote]

>>17765484
It's happening right now see >>17765610

 β„–17765629[Quote]

File: 1787092090473w.mp4 πŸ“₯︎ (92.38 KB, 480x360) ImgOps


 β„–17765630[Quote]

>>17765610
i mean by that logic cow udders are sexual

 β„–17765641[Quote]

>>17765621
Some things never change

 β„–17765642[Quote]

>>>17765610 (You)
>i mean by that logic cow udders are sexual

its still not appropiate to show a naked child, in any context

 β„–17765650[Quote]

>>17765530
tsmt doctos and oreos

 β„–17765690[Quote]

File: 1784545793431r.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (43.64 KB, 677x680) ImgOps

>>17765456 (OP)
OP posted this because he's aroused by it

 β„–17765700[Quote]

>>17765642
doctoddlers like you never changed a babies diaper or even seen a baby irl

 β„–17765704[Quote]

I remember seeing guitar hero having that image, doctoss

 β„–17765711[Quote]

DOCTODDLER SHUT UP NIGGER

 β„–17765736[Quote]

>>17765642
yeah but we dont see pictures of animals as sexual, even doe they are naked

 β„–17765746[Quote]

>>17765598
Giggers…



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]