i think this site's admins has been going along some form of rulecuck pendulum, where we swing from extreme rulecuckery to extreme unrulecuckery. soot was somewhat rulecucked in the sense that he wanted /soy/ to remain strictly IAS but still allowed NAS

Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:42:22 №17732053 [Quote]

i think this site's admins has been going along some form of rulecuck pendulum, where we swing from extreme rulecuckery to extreme unrulecuckery.
soot was somewhat rulecucked in the sense that he wanted /soy/ to remain strictly IAS but still allowed NAS to thrive in other boards.
kuz was less rulecucked in that he allowed more NAS on /soy/ and generally was more free than soot, but still kept rules to preserve the sharty's culture.
doll is somewhat in between soot and kuz, being in the middle of the pendulum. dollism is mainly a hybrid between the 2 ideologies presented.
froot was a lot more rulecucked in the sense that he banned everything he didn't like along with trying to monetize the site for money
quote was a lot less rulecucked than froot, especially for more brimmish shit like furfags and namefaggotry, fully allowing NAS and the namefield on /soy/ and attempting to radically change sharty culture (which luckily failed)
saltism is similarly not rulecucked like quote, minus the major change of allowing gore. this means that while brimmish shit is still allowed, it's not as effective as it once was due to the threads being shat up with gore.
it's likely the next admin will be even less rulecucked, and the one after will rulecuck more due to what the previous admin allowed, and the cycle will continue.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:43:13 №17732061 [Quote]

bbc

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:44:23 №17732075 [Quote]

2kkifag You're typing too many words for me can I please have a TLDR

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:44:40 №17732078 [Quote]

I hate all your threads, you could always boil all your shit down to like 2 sentences but you have to be extra and add a bunch of nonsense in to make yourself look like some genius oldfag with 4000 posts and truthnukes on /r9k/, fuck off

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:46:17 №17732098 [Quote]

File: meximutt (brapnvke).png 📥︎ (1.42 MB, 1640x1276) ImgOps

>i think this site's admins has been going along some form of rulecuck pendulum, where we swing from extreme rulecuckery to extreme unrulecuckery.
>soot was somewhat rulecucked in the sense that he wanted /soy/ to remain strictly IAS but still allowed NAS to thrive in other boards.
>kuz was less rulecucked in that he allowed more NAS on /soy/ and generally was more free than soot, but still kept rules to preserve the sharty's culture.
>doll is somewhat in between soot and kuz, being in the middle of the pendulum. dollism is mainly a hybrid between the 2 ideologies presented.
>froot was a lot more rulecucked in the sense that he banned everything he didn't like along with trying to monetize the site for money
>quote was a lot less rulecucked than froot, especially for more brimmish shit like furfags and namefaggotry, fully allowing NAS and the namefield on /soy/ and attempting to radically change sharty culture (which luckily failed)
>saltism is similarly not rulecucked like quote, minus the major change of allowing gore. this means that while brimmish shit is still allowed, it's not as effective as it once was due to the threads being shat up with gore.
>it's likely the next admin will be even less rulecucked, and the one after will rulecuck more due to what the previous admin allowed, and the cycle will continue.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:46:43 №17732104 [Quote]

File: 1784748321591h.jpeg 📥︎ (71.49 KB, 1179x885) ImgOps

>just like muh dark soyls

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:47:02 №17732107 [Quote]

>>17732078
i like explaining my reasoning and i will keep explaining them. 'nonsense' or not its how i see it kek
the first sentence of my threads usually have the point in them anyway

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:48:27 №17732118 [Quote]

Go fuck yourself you stupid nigger not a single soul care about your admin drama, stop taking this website seriously faggot, eventually all of is will leave it.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:48:40 №17732122 [Quote]

File: cobson brown trans.png 📥︎ (81.59 KB, 1500x1362) ImgOps

>>>17732078 (You)
>i like explaining my reasoning and i will keep explaining them. 'nonsense' or not its how i see it kek
>the first sentence of my threads usually have the point in them anyway

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:49:00 №17732124 [Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (122.42 KB, 415x707) ImgOps

>i think this site's admins has been going along some form of rulecuck pendulum, where we swing from extreme rulecuckery to extreme unrulecuckery.
>soot was somewhat rulecucked in the sense that he wanted /soy/ to remain strictly IAS but still allowed NAS to thrive in other boards.
>kuz was less rulecucked in that he allowed more NAS on /soy/ and generally was more free than soot, but still kept rules to preserve the sharty's culture.
>doll is somewhat in between soot and kuz, being in the middle of the pendulum. dollism is mainly a hybrid between the 2 ideologies presented.
>froot was a lot more rulecucked in the sense that he banned everything he didn't like along with trying to monetize the site for money
>quote was a lot less rulecucked than froot, especially for more brimmish shit like furfags and namefaggotry, fully allowing NAS and the namefield on /soy/ and attempting to radically change sharty culture (which luckily failed)
>saltism is similarly not rulecucked like quote, minus the major change of allowing gore. this means that while brimmish shit is still allowed, it's not as effective as it once was due to the threads being shat up with gore.
>it's likely the next admin will be even less rulecucked, and the one after will rulecuck more due to what the previous admin allowed, and the cycle will continue.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:49:25 №17732129 [Quote]

>soot era larper
KEK, you're a faggot tranny freak and no one cares

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:50:03 №17732134 [Quote]

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:50:15 №17732136 [Quote]

>>17732107
fuck off from this website faggot no one not a single soul care about your threads and admindrama faggot

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:50:41 №17732140 [Quote]

>>17732129
>larping soot era
marge when did i say i was from the soot era

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:50:56 №17732141 [Quote]

File: 1788289661140j.png 📥︎ (101.18 KB, 701x484) ImgOps

>>17732122
YOU ARE NOT ME

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:51:01 №17732143 [Quote]

File: 1788050056307f.jpeg 📥︎ (32.28 KB, 736x633) ImgOps

>muh nigger admin blah blah gooned to bwc blah blah snca snca
Fuck off faggot

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:52:07 №17732147 [Quote]

>>17732140
>soot was somewhat rulecucked
GGEGGGGGGG THIS NIGGER TALKS ABOUT OLD ADMINS WHILE KNOWING NOTHING ABOUT THEM LMAOOOOOOO, FUCKING END YOUR LIFE LOSER

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:53:14 №17732157 [Quote]

File: 1785110660130l.png 📥︎ (67.38 KB, 255x148) ImgOps

>Tranimefaggot makes insightful metaSNCA thread
>Random nusois clitty leak anyway rather than letting the thread die
Nusois, you're hopeless

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:53:14 №17732158 [Quote]

noone cares about your blog posting and projection and leaking. If you don't like this website then fuck off no one is forcing you to use it, stop complaining like a bpd diddyfoid.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:53:24 №17732160 [Quote]

>>17732053 (OP)
You WILL wish for a fruity day now

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:53:29 №17732162 [Quote]

shoo away.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:53:38 №17732167 [Quote]

>>17732134
nigger learn to fucking read geeeg

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:54:18 №17732174 [Quote]

>>17732157
if this nigger monkey doesn't get backlash then he will continue his snca admin cock sucking drama

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:54:40 №17732179 [Quote]

When did you join this website mister nigger faggot?

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:54:53 №17732182 [Quote]

>>17732158
>projection and leaking
marge when did i say this
>if you dont like this website
marge when did i say this
>stop complaining
marge when did i do this

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:55:04 №17732186 [Quote]

>>17732179
mid-late froot era

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:55:23 №17732195 [Quote]

File: gigachad sax edit.mp4 📥︎ (970.52 KB, 576x1024) ImgOps

>>>17732122 (You)
>YOU ARE NOT ME

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:55:45 №17732201 [Quote]

>>17732186
KEKKKKKKKKKKKK LITERALLY NEWFAG PRETENDING TO BE SOMETHING KEK

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:56:11 №17732208 [Quote]

>>17732186
FrQQt 'teen, I kneel

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:56:18 №17732211 [Quote]

>>17732182
actual delusional monkey, fucking read your blogpost metawhining thread.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:56:37 №17732214 [Quote]

>>17732147
> THIS NIGGER TALKS ABOUT OLD ADMINS WHILE KNOWING NOTHING ABOUT THEM
i can make inferences from 'ki pages and 'chives for the most part since i'd trust those sources rather than random nuswas

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:57:27 №17732225 [Quote]

>>17732214
oh my god you're such a faggot

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:58:46 №17732238 [Quote]

>>17732211
the most i did was complain about quote, everything else didn't include much of my opinion on it, dont see where i projected or said i disliked the website.
>>17732225
if you're going to keep reppying can you point out where i projected or said i didn't like the site kek

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:59:11 №17732243 [Quote]

Test

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:59:17 №17732245 [Quote]

Nobody cares + you’re a pedo

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 14:59:48 №17732250 [Quote]

You're a pedo lolifaggot and you will never be a real woman

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:00:04 №17732253 [Quote]

File: FrogSissies55.png 📥︎ (723.94 KB, 1170x1050) ImgOps

File: FrogSissies144.png 📥︎ (1.97 MB, 1170x1869) ImgOps

File: FrogSissies140.png 📥︎ (898.3 KB, 1170x1272) ImgOps

File: FrogLoss16.png 📥︎ (155.22 KB, 797x907) ImgOps

>>Tranimefaggot makes insightful metaSNCA thread
>>Random nusois clitty leak anyway rather than letting the thread die
>Nusois, you're hopeless

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:00:18 №17732257 [Quote]

File: 1787431289730c.png 📥︎ (122.63 KB, 255x250) ImgOps

>>17732174
Judging from these reppies I dont think they care and they'll probably keep doing it so do better and let the threads die nusoi

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:00:46 №17732265 [Quote]

This is untrue quote was the biggest rulekike on the planet

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:01:13 №17732274 [Quote]

File: nzYgRz5oEfDs3Vco.mp4 📥︎ (644.81 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

>i think this site's admins has been going along some form of rulecuck pendulum, where we swing from extreme rulecuckery to extreme unrulecuckery.
>soot was somewhat rulecucked in the sense that he wanted /soy/ to remain strictly IAS but still allowed NAS to thrive in other boards.
>kuz was less rulecucked in that he allowed more NAS on /soy/ and generally was more free than soot, but still kept rules to preserve the sharty's culture.
>doll is somewhat in between soot and kuz, being in the middle of the pendulum. dollism is mainly a hybrid between the 2 ideologies presented.
>froot was a lot more rulecucked in the sense that he banned everything he didn't like along with trying to monetize the site for money
>quote was a lot less rulecucked than froot, especially for more brimmish shit like furfags and namefaggotry, fully allowing NAS and the namefield on /soy/ and attempting to radically change sharty culture (which luckily failed)
>saltism is similarly not rulecucked like quote, minus the major change of allowing gore. this means that while brimmish shit is still allowed, it's not as effective as it once was due to the threads being shat up with gore.
>it's likely the next admin will be even less rulecucked, and the one after will rulecuck more due to what the previous admin allowed, and the cycle will continue.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:01:34 №17732280 [Quote]

File: Oekaki.png 📥︎ (48.37 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

>>17732158
Balance saar

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:01:35 №17732281 [Quote]

>>17732265
dont get me wrong quote was still rulecucked, just a lot less than froot

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:01:37 №17732282 [Quote]

File: FrogSissies11.png 📥︎ (972.99 KB, 1170x1397) ImgOps

File: FrogSissies4.png 📥︎ (533.74 KB, 1080x1133) ImgOps

File: frogsissies6 2.png 📥︎ (92.42 KB, 1373x293) ImgOps

File: FrogSissies95.png 📥︎ (71.99 KB, 530x570) ImgOps

>>>17732174 (You)
>Judging from these reppies I dont think they care and they'll probably keep doing it so do better and let the threads die nusoi

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:01:55 №17732286 [Quote]

>>17732257
okay frogge if you say so

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:02:48 №17732297 [Quote]

>>17732281
Froot allowed gore and dnb back in 2023 it was only in 2024 he became rulecucked and gay

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:03:21 №17732304 [Quote]

File: 1783905048731f.mp4 📥︎ (2.41 MB, 362x410) ImgOps

>i think this site's admins has been going along some form of rulecuck pendulum, where we swing from extreme rulecuckery to extreme unrulecuckery.
>soot was somewhat rulecucked in the sense that he wanted /soy/ to remain strictly IAS but still allowed NAS to thrive in other boards.
>kuz was less rulecucked in that he allowed more NAS on /soy/ and generally was more free than soot, but still kept rules to preserve the sharty's culture.
>doll is somewhat in between soot and kuz, being in the middle of the pendulum. dollism is mainly a hybrid between the 2 ideologies presented.
>froot was a lot more rulecucked in the sense that he banned everything he didn't like along with trying to monetize the site for money
>quote was a lot less rulecucked than froot, especially for more brimmish shit like furfags and namefaggotry, fully allowing NAS and the namefield on /soy/ and attempting to radically change sharty culture (which luckily failed)
>saltism is similarly not rulecucked like quote, minus the major change of allowing gore. this means that while brimmish shit is still allowed, it's not as effective as it once was due to the threads being shat up with gore.
>it's likely the next admin will be even less rulecucked, and the one after will rulecuck more due to what the previous admin allowed, and the cycle will continue.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:03:31 №17732308 [Quote]

>>17732297
i think i should've differentiated between early vs late froot, that is my fault actually

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:03:47 №17732315 [Quote]

File: 1788820297081u.mp4 📥︎ (821.81 KB, 536x720) ImgOps

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:05:15 №17732343 [Quote]

File: 30134_-_SoyBooru.png 📥︎ (28.96 KB, 554x772) ImgOps

>>>17732297 (You)
>i think i should've differentiated between early vs late froot, that is my fault actually

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:05:59 №17732351 [Quote]

File: its_just_getting_frooty.png 📥︎ (717.75 KB, 1200x2075) ImgOps

>i think this site's admins has been going along some form of rulecuck pendulum, where we swing from extreme rulecuckery to extreme unrulecuckery.
>soot was somewhat rulecucked in the sense that he wanted /soy/ to remain strictly IAS but still allowed NAS to thrive in other boards.
>kuz was less rulecucked in that he allowed more NAS on /soy/ and generally was more free than soot, but still kept rules to preserve the sharty's culture.
>doll is somewhat in between soot and kuz, being in the middle of the pendulum. dollism is mainly a hybrid between the 2 ideologies presented.
>froot was a lot more rulecucked in the sense that he banned everything he didn't like along with trying to monetize the site for money
>quote was a lot less rulecucked than froot, especially for more brimmish shit like furfags and namefaggotry, fully allowing NAS and the namefield on /soy/ and attempting to radically change sharty culture (which luckily failed)
>saltism is similarly not rulecucked like quote, minus the major change of allowing gore. this means that while brimmish shit is still allowed, it's not as effective as it once was due to the threads being shat up with gore.
>it's likely the next admin will be even less rulecucked, and the one after will rulecuck more due to what the previous admin allowed, and the cycle will continue.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:07:11 №17732366 [Quote]

File: Oekaki.png 📥︎ (15.44 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

>>17732257
I care.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:07:27 №17732371 [Quote]

File: gigasuperrape.png 📥︎ (236.69 KB, 974x1196) ImgOps

See how many reppies your thread gets when you make people leak 2kkifag? You should make bait. You know you want to.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:07:37 №17732376 [Quote]

File: THIS GIF MAY INDUCE NIGHTM….gif 📥︎ (5.42 MB, 428x320) ImgOps

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:07:41 №17732377 [Quote]

Op here how did you know i goon to 'p?

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:08:12 №17732386 [Quote]

>>17732377
DO NOT QUOTE

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:09:03 №17732394 [Quote]

>>17732386
nobody is gigaquoting dis

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:09:17 №17732398 [Quote]

File: 1787494920108n.png 📥︎ (204.01 KB, 1000x1000) ImgOps

>See how many reppies your thread gets when you make people leak 2kkifag? You should make bait. You know you want to.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:10:00 №17732404 [Quote]

File: 1788643461474j.png 📥︎ (504.47 KB, 1024x1024) ImgOps

>Op here how did you know i goon to 'p?

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:11:05 №17732415 [Quote]

>60 reppies in under 30 minutes, almost 2 reppies a minute from one tranime metawhining thread
saltcord is taking notes

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:12:01 №17732422 [Quote]

>>17732386
rulefriending is very nice as there would be few faggots to challenge peace, you sometimes would see a barrage of spam of niggers eating each other's bbcs now but if implemented, it would be as plentiful as rain in UAE

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:12:12 №17732424 [Quote]

File: tiki-tiki-tiki-phonk.png 📥︎ (104.4 KB, 456x379) ImgOps

>i think this site's admins has been going along some form of rulecuck pendulum, where we swing from extreme rulecuckery to extreme unrulecuckery.
>soot was somewhat rulecucked in the sense that he wanted /soy/ to remain strictly IAS but still allowed NAS to thrive in other boards.
>kuz was less rulecucked in that he allowed more NAS on /soy/ and generally was more free than soot, but still kept rules to preserve the sharty's culture.
>doll is somewhat in between soot and kuz, being in the middle of the pendulum. dollism is mainly a hybrid between the 2 ideologies presented.
>froot was a lot more rulecucked in the sense that he banned everything he didn't like along with trying to monetize the site for money
>quote was a lot less rulecucked than froot, especially for more brimmish shit like furfags and namefaggotry, fully allowing NAS and the namefield on /soy/ and attempting to radically change sharty culture (which luckily failed)
>saltism is similarly not rulecucked like quote, minus the major change of allowing gore. this means that while brimmish shit is still allowed, it's not as effective as it once was due to the threads being shat up with gore.
>it's likely the next admin will be even less rulecucked, and the one after will rulecuck more due to what the previous admin allowed, and the cycle will continue.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:12:21 №17732425 [Quote]

>>17732415
kek

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:12:44 №17732428 [Quote]

>>17732422
wrong reply

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:15:29 №17732463 [Quote]

>>17732422
i feel like the sharty isn't the site for extreme conformity and rulecucking simply because that'd be against a normally chaotic site culture
this site is radically different from any other imageboard and rules like other imageboards wont fare as well in places like the sharty or its splinters.

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:19:18 №17732512 [Quote]

>>17732415
what if 2kkifag is a saltcord janny

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:20:16 №17732523 [Quote]

>>17732512
I WANT HIM TO DIE SO HE NEVER POSTS AGAIN I HATE HIM SO MUCH I HATE HIM I HATE HIM I HATE HIM

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:21:18 №17732543 [Quote]

>>17732523
its not this serious

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:30:09 №17732685 [Quote]

>>17732523
Bumping this bait that one specific person leaks at so it doesn't get buried in bait thats snca

Chud 09/10/26 (Thu) 15:30:43 №17732691 [Quote]

File: 2019.mp4 📥︎ (2.34 MB, 576x1024) ImgOps

>i think this site's admins has been going along some form of rulecuck pendulum, where we swing from extreme rulecuckery to extreme unrulecuckery.
>soot was somewhat rulecucked in the sense that he wanted /soy/ to remain strictly IAS but still allowed NAS to thrive in other boards.
>kuz was less rulecucked in that he allowed more NAS on /soy/ and generally was more free than soot, but still kept rules to preserve the sharty's culture.
>doll is somewhat in between soot and kuz, being in the middle of the pendulum. dollism is mainly a hybrid between the 2 ideologies presented.
>froot was a lot more rulecucked in the sense that he banned everything he didn't like along with trying to monetize the site for money
>quote was a lot less rulecucked than froot, especially for more brimmish shit like furfags and namefaggotry, fully allowing NAS and the namefield on /soy/ and attempting to radically change sharty culture (which luckily failed)
>saltism is similarly not rulecucked like quote, minus the major change of allowing gore. this means that while brimmish shit is still allowed, it's not as effective as it once was due to the threads being shat up with gore.
>it's likely the next admin will be even less rulecucked, and the one after will rulecuck more due to what the previous admin allowed, and the cycle will continue.