>>17571507 (OP)More or less, it went like this
>4cuck thread made about issue >4cuck members with decent cybersecurity knowledge would try things out on whatever website/the target/the account>4cuck members who were doing shit would share what they had tried & what information they had scrounged up, a la current sharty raid threads, just instead it was vulnerabilities or information found, or even reporting successes >By the end of the raid (which is effectively what it was), they would choose to attribute it to "Anonymous" and not take any individual credit