№17522569[Quote]
Should jannies ban 'T?
'T refers to such as trannies showing their terrifying neo-vagina, shitty diaper, and other fucked up shit like pictures of grooming kids to transsexuals
More info on
>>17522050 (OP) №17522619[Quote]
Make sure to bump the thread so others can vote
№17522621[Quote]
Can't vote but ban it UNLESS it's used as a weapon against our enemies
Also 'T mostly refers to half-skinless neopenis pooner brimstone, do NOT attempt to view it nusois, you WILL regret it
№17522639[Quote]
shit is literally original meaning of 'o
№17522644[Quote]
It should only be used to NVKE our enemies
№17522658[Quote]
>>17522639It's even worse than pizzacake's gaping vagina and worm eggs spam
№17522686[Quote]
It's definitely worse than gore, but then again, that means it is more effective
№17522705[Quote]
The surgical mutiliation of genitals done to trannies shouldn't be banned.
It shows the hideous reality of trannies that is normally obscured by their propaganda.
№17522716[Quote]
i cant vote cause opsec demon or something like that yeah but we shouldnt ban it cause its unnecessary rulecucking o algo
Also when is the white version of yotsoba b coming back i cant read text fr
№17522726[Quote]
All "oldfags" on /soy/ are larpers, remember that real oldfags hang out on the niche boards
№17522732[Quote]
Up i want people to vote on this
№17522738[Quote]
Bump
№17522751[Quote]
Allow it so I can goon to it
№17522761[Quote]
>>17522751(Except for the grooming kids part ofc :3)
№17522786[Quote]
>>17522751Slit your throat nigger
№17522803[Quote]
Also there was a good cause for banning all of this before quote enacted the cacacaust
№17522810[Quote]
>banning 't
why? its not like gore where its exploitation content and you could make a moral argument about it, these people post it publicly with the intention of everyone seeing
№17522815[Quote]
only oldfag opinion matters.
't should be allowed because everyone needs to know how evil they are. think of banning 't like burying evidence. it's faggoted behavior. also we can dodis with it
>>17522644 №17522833[Quote]
>>17522810I guess one could make the argument that it's grosser, but i disagree
№17522854[Quote]
>>17522833i think it objectively is more disgusting while managing to be void of any moral concern. also trannies would HATE seeing trannies that go all the way and disfigure themselves. i think if gore posters had any actual argument, they'd be spamming 't
№17522881[Quote]
the real argument is whether you could see it as porn technically. Like if somebaldi posted a pooner that only had bottom surgery she would still have boobs naked or whatever
№17522899[Quote]
>>17522881i think if someone is jerking off to that theres something extremely extremely wrong with them
id understand people jerking off to 'cado spam more than literal tranny disfigurement
№17522900[Quote]
i think its weird to ban nsfw porn but not nsfl porn
imo dont ban it but make it have to be tagged
№17522922[Quote]
>>17522899literal trannies might goon to it idk