[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/soy/ - Soyjaks

The Serious Boardβ„’ for feedback, suggestions, and metawhining
Catalog
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786739189202y.png πŸ“₯︎ (17.05 KB, 600x922) ImgOps

 β„–17359171[Quote]

posting pictures of little girls, fictional or not, simply because you like them is pedophilia

 β„–17359189[Quote]

Not necessarily true a lot of normalfags post pictures of their daughters on social media

 β„–17359209[Quote]

>>17359189
ur posting ur daughter online for other people

 β„–17359240[Quote]

By that logic posting babyjak is pedophilia too, quit being obsessed with us animeGODS.

 β„–17359242[Quote]

>>17359209
99% of people aren't pedophiles. Also I doubt most pedo will get off to some random video of someone's daughter playing with toy planes or whatever. Similar to how most normal guys don't get turned on when seeing regular clothed women in public. Maybe I'm wrong doe.

 β„–17359249[Quote]


 β„–17359276[Quote]

??? Does that mean if your mother take picture of you as a kid because she loved you she's a pee dough? Op kill youtself

 β„–17359305[Quote]

OP is a swinnyshit who projects his pedophilia on everyone

 β„–17359311[Quote]

>>17359276
no, only if she posts them

 β„–17359320[Quote]

>>17359305
infamous failpedo 'p spammer ip dni

 β„–17359971[Quote]

>>17359242
various goonclown-esque individuals been exposed to still managing to goon to regular non-sexual pictures of kids, or they use jailbroken indian gen ai to make fetish videos or something like that yeah

 β„–17360057[Quote]

>>17359971
Doesn't mean the parents are pedophiles. 99% of normalfags don't even think about the existence of people like that.

 β„–17360109[Quote]

I hate tranimeniggers but this is simple just not true

 β„–17360192[Quote]

ultimate hunky thread

 β„–17360197[Quote]

>>17360057
obviosly, just wanted to make my point against it. It's not good for kids to be on the internet, even if you are posting them.

 β„–17360209[Quote]

File: 1785506405038q.gif πŸ“₯︎ (3.8 MB, 400x360) ImgOps


 β„–17360213[Quote]


 β„–17360217[Quote]

>>17359171 (OP)
TRVKE. liking a little girl that you don't know - that isn't your daughter or a family friend's daughter or a niece or something like that - is weird as shit

 β„–17360266[Quote]

>>17360109
While it might be not true, what is in the root of "liking little girls"? Epecially ones not related to your family. Best case scenario is some sort of age regression shit where you insert as the girl, and possible motivations only get worse from here

 β„–17360267[Quote]

>>17359171 (OP)
wait so does that mean you want to fuck the neutraplier, op

 β„–17360300[Quote]

>>17360266
hunkies believe that if you think children are cute (which is fundamentally correct, this opinion is engraved in your brain) you are a jartycuck or whatever

 β„–17360331[Quote]

>>17360267
Everybody wants to fuck neutralplier

 β„–17360342[Quote]


 β„–17360362[Quote]

>>17359171 (OP)
>>17360331
this guy wants to have sex with smug nate btw https://soyjak.st/soy/thread/17357055.html

 β„–17360363[Quote]

>>17360300
Okay, thinking childrean are cute is one thing, but what about moefags who spam their moe blob littel girls wherewere they go? When asked directly they either insult you or default to some "cute and funny" shit.

 β„–17360390[Quote]


 β„–17360404[Quote]

>>17360363
you simply dont want to fuck anything you post. simple as that

 β„–17360405[Quote]

>>17360363
They're usually pedophiles

 β„–17360406[Quote]


 β„–17360410[Quote]

>>17360363
you know cute and funny is supposed to be a dogwhistle or whatever for the word "cunny"

 β„–17360423[Quote]

>>17360410
this should obviously come off as obvious

 β„–17360436[Quote]

>>17360363
if someone calls them cute and funny, he essentially confirms he is a lolicon pedo. if someone obsesses over moe but isn't a cunny guy, he is just a retarded otaku. if someone simply claims a little girl in an anime is cute, but doesn't obsess over cuteness any more than normal, that's a normal person/standard weeb. the problem is that anime artstyle makes everything cutesy, so it spawns the first 2 categories easily.

 β„–17360450[Quote]

>>17359171 (OP)
>>17360266
Literally no normal person thinks shit like this when they see someone post goynime girls soycucks are actually fucking mentally deranged

 β„–17360463[Quote]

File: 1783742067471u.png πŸ“₯︎ (64.44 KB, 648x891) ImgOps

>>>17359171 (OP)
>>>17360266 (OP)
>Literally no normal person thinks shit like this when they see someone post goynime girls soycucks are actually fucking mentally deranged

 β„–17360467[Quote]

>>17360436
>>17360423
>>17360410
>>17360405
nice how everybody is ignoring this >>17360404

 β„–17360480[Quote]

File: 1787134797238m.png πŸ“₯︎ (297.34 KB, 1675x1583) ImgOps

>>>17360363
>you simply dont want to fuck anything you post. simple as that

 β„–17360481[Quote]

>>17360450
What did you expect from the most enslaved imageboard in existence

 β„–17360487[Quote]


 β„–17360495[Quote]

>>17360467
That's true but in my experience guys who post moeshit are pedophiles. That might just be cause I grew up on 4cuck though.

 β„–17360511[Quote]

File: 1785738581464c.gif πŸ“₯︎ (53.65 KB, 580x773) ImgOps

>>>17360450
>What did you expect from the most enslaved imageboard in existence

 β„–17360528[Quote]

File: 1782719607408m.mp4 πŸ“₯︎ (3.01 MB, 1080x1920) ImgOps

>>>17359171 (OP)
>>>17360266
>Literally no normal person thinks shit like this when they see someone post goynime girls soycucks are actually fucking mentally deranged

 β„–17360539[Quote]

File: 1785133375228j.mp4 πŸ“₯︎ (7.77 MB, 720x720) ImgOps

>posting pictures of little girls, fictional or not, simply because you like them is pedophilia

 β„–17360549[Quote]

File: 1783364460920y.png πŸ“₯︎ (481.45 KB, 1024x1024) ImgOps

posting pictures of little girls, fictional or not, simply because you like them is pedophilia

 β„–17360678[Quote]


>>17360436
Yeah, thanks, this sounds about right.
<
Also I have a personal theory that conflation of cuteness with sexiness is something that causes pedophilia. And while anime most animes make everything cutesy, I think fanservice or hentai might lead someone into pedophilic tendencies.



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]