>>17348366 (OP)This is just a terrible way to measure the decline of an imageboard. The thing is, someone will post extreme fringe content eventually, and if that content happens to function as good bait, it will be posted more. Also, as multiple people have pointed out before me, this was common in gemmy eras like when Kuz was admin.
Here’s how you actually measure the decline of the Sharty. Point me to one gemmy thread on the catalog right now. Can’t find any? Yeah. THAT is the decline. You should measure imageboards by what they lack, not by what they have. You literally can’t see the decline of an imageboard because it’s invisible by definition. You just see a replacement of what once was. That’s what makes it so eerie. Not that a newfag like you could understand.
>>17348426They didn’t.