[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/soy/ - Soyjaks

The Serious Boardβ„’ for feedback, suggestions, and metawhining
Catalog
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1783805762768o.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (99.32 KB, 850x914) ImgOps

 β„–17326207[Quote]

[start of transcript]
i wanted to discuss something with you
what is it
the wheelchair
whats important about a wheelchair
it exists because of the weak
and
those weak people therefore get extra help because of the wheelchair
so what they need it
isnt that anti-equality
of course but to have a completely equal society would harm the disadvantaged, making a society based upon equity better
so those who are poor should be given money, rewarded for their poverty whereas those who arent poor should give their money
well its only fair assuming we're taking it off of the surplus of course
but then whats the point of making that surplus why not just stop once you have enough
what do you mean
considering any excess money you make ends up in someone elses pockets what motivation is there to work more when you can sustain yourself for longer by working less
the knowledge that youre actively helping the economy by giving more people the chance to work
but not all people are work able how do you account for that
do you believe they should just die because of something out of there control
their birth was out of there control too so it evens out
that doesnt make sense how can you kill someone just for being born
if somebody kills a bunch of people purely to save themselves youd agree they be put down right
right
well by taking and not giving thats exactly what happens more people will die and therefore the act of killing the parasite in this case is a moral good
okay but what about those who are impoverished by circumstance
what about them
wouldnt you agree they deserve a chance at work
they do have a chance at work
but theres no guarantee they will make as much money as they need
indeed but thats how the world works and they too by wasting money damage their livelihoods
why are you anti helping people
theres no reason for me to in an equity based society
of course there is because you work as a group and they give the money back
but i still lose money because it cancels out to a free product
[end of transcript]

 β„–17326218[Quote]

File: 1782796437202n.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (199.97 KB, 722x677) ImgOps

>[start of transcript]
>i wanted to discuss something with you
>what is it
>the wheelchair
>whats important about a wheelchair
>it exists because of the weak
>and
>those weak people therefore get extra help because of the wheelchair
>so what they need it
>isnt that anti-equality
>of course but to have a completely equal society would harm the disadvantaged, making a society based upon equity better
>so those who are poor should be given money, rewarded for their poverty whereas those who arent poor should give their money
>well its only fair assuming we're taking it off of the surplus of course
>but then whats the point of making that surplus why not just stop once you have enough
>what do you mean
>considering any excess money you make ends up in someone elses pockets what motivation is there to work more when you can sustain yourself for longer by working less
>the knowledge that youre actively helping the economy by giving more people the chance to work
>but not all people are work able how do you account for that
>do you believe they should just die because of something out of there control
>their birth was out of there control too so it evens out
>that doesnt make sense how can you kill someone just for being born
>if somebody kills a bunch of people purely to save themselves youd agree they be put down right
>right
>well by taking and not giving thats exactly what happens more people will die and therefore the act of killing the parasite in this case is a moral good
>okay but what about those who are impoverished by circumstance
>what about them
>wouldnt you agree they deserve a chance at work
>they do have a chance at work
>but theres no guarantee they will make as much money as they need
>indeed but thats how the world works and they too by wasting money damage their livelihoods
>why are you anti helping people
>theres no reason for me to in an equity based society
>of course there is because you work as a group and they give the money back
>but i still lose money because it cancels out to a free product
>[end of transcript]

 β„–17326225[Quote]

File: 1784946188575w.png πŸ“₯︎ (65.35 KB, 592x720) ImgOps

>>[start of transcript]
>>i wanted to discuss something with you
>>what is it
>>the wheelchair
>>whats important about a wheelchair
>>it exists because of the weak
>>and
>>those weak people therefore get extra help because of the wheelchair
>>so what they need it
>>isnt that anti-equality
>>of course but to have a completely equal society would harm the disadvantaged, making a society based upon equity better
>>so those who are poor should be given money, rewarded for their poverty whereas those who arent poor should give their money
>>well its only fair assuming we're taking it off of the surplus of course
>>but then whats the point of making that surplus why not just stop once you have enough
>>what do you mean
>>considering any excess money you make ends up in someone elses pockets what motivation is there to work more when you can sustain yourself for longer by working less
>>the knowledge that youre actively helping the economy by giving more people the chance to work
>>but not all people are work able how do you account for that
>>do you believe they should just die because of something out of there control
>>their birth was out of there control too so it evens out
>>that doesnt make sense how can you kill someone just for being born
>>if somebody kills a bunch of people purely to save themselves youd agree they be put down right
>>right
>>well by taking and not giving thats exactly what happens more people will die and therefore the act of killing the parasite in this case is a moral good
>>okay but what about those who are impoverished by circumstance
>>what about them
>>wouldnt you agree they deserve a chance at work
>>they do have a chance at work
>>but theres no guarantee they will make as much money as they need
>>indeed but thats how the world works and they too by wasting money damage their livelihoods
>>why are you anti helping people
>>theres no reason for me to in an equity based society
>>of course there is because you work as a group and they give the money back
>>but i still lose money because it cancels out to a free product
>>[end of transcript]

 β„–17326231[Quote]

+1 upvote

 β„–17326232[Quote]

nga gave us a whole socratic dialogue
i aint reading allat

 β„–17326236[Quote]

>>17326207 (OP)
this presupposes that equality is good

 β„–17326241[Quote]

Tranime pic not rel but tsmtnvke

 β„–17326247[Quote]

>>17326236
its not a bad presupposition in a conversation about equity

 β„–17326250[Quote]

>>17326247
completely wrong.

 β„–17326312[Quote]

File: smugchuddie.png πŸ“₯︎ (16.85 KB, 772x1062) ImgOps

>>>17326247
>completely wrong.

 β„–17326378[Quote]

File: Dwight's retard scream - l….mp4 πŸ“₯︎ (124.81 KB, 136x240) ImgOps

>[start of transcript]
>i wanted to discuss something with you
>what is it
>the wheelchair
>whats important about a wheelchair
>it exists because of the weak
>and
>those weak people therefore get extra help because of the wheelchair
>so what they need it
>isnt that anti-equality
>of course but to have a completely equal society would harm the disadvantaged, making a society based upon equity better
>so those who are poor should be given money, rewarded for their poverty whereas those who arent poor should give their money
>well its only fair assuming we're taking it off of the surplus of course
>but then whats the point of making that surplus why not just stop once you have enough
>what do you mean
>considering any excess money you make ends up in someone elses pockets what motivation is there to work more when you can sustain yourself for longer by working less
>the knowledge that youre actively helping the economy by giving more people the chance to work
>but not all people are work able how do you account for that
>do you believe they should just die because of something out of there control
>their birth was out of there control too so it evens out
>that doesnt make sense how can you kill someone just for being born
>if somebody kills a bunch of people purely to save themselves youd agree they be put down right
>right
>well by taking and not giving thats exactly what happens more people will die and therefore the act of killing the parasite in this case is a moral good
>okay but what about those who are impoverished by circumstance
>what about them
>wouldnt you agree they deserve a chance at work
>they do have a chance at work
>but theres no guarantee they will make as much money as they need
>indeed but thats how the world works and they too by wasting money damage their livelihoods
>why are you anti helping people
>theres no reason for me to in an equity based society
>of course there is because you work as a group and they give the money back
>but i still lose money because it cancels out to a free product
>[end of transcript]

 β„–17326387[Quote]

File: 1786171582790w.gif πŸ“₯︎ (10.32 MB, 500x500) ImgOps

[start of transcript]
i wanted to discuss something with you
what is it
the wheelchair
whats important about a wheelchair
it exists because of the weak
and
those weak people therefore get extra help because of the wheelchair
so what they need it
isnt that anti-equality
of course but to have a completely equal society would harm the disadvantaged, making a society based upon equity better
so those who are poor should be given money, rewarded for their poverty whereas those who arent poor should give their money
well its only fair assuming we're taking it off of the surplus of course
but then whats the point of making that surplus why not just stop once you have enough
what do you mean
considering any excess money you make ends up in someone elses pockets what motivation is there to work more when you can sustain yourself for longer by working less
the knowledge that youre actively helping the economy by giving more people the chance to work
but not all people are work able how do you account for that
do you believe they should just die because of something out of there control
their birth was out of there control too so it evens out
that doesnt make sense how can you kill someone just for being born
if somebody kills a bunch of people purely to save themselves youd agree they be put down right
right
well by taking and not giving thats exactly what happens more people will die and therefore the act of killing the parasite in this case is a moral good
okay but what about those who are impoverished by circumstance
what about them
wouldnt you agree they deserve a chance at work
they do have a chance at work
but theres no guarantee they will make as much money as they need
indeed but thats how the world works and they too by wasting money damage their livelihoods
why are you anti helping people
theres no reason for me to in an equity based society
of course there is because you work as a group and they give the money back
but i still lose money because it cancels out to a free product
[end of transcript]

 β„–17326409[Quote]

Kevin Spencer cerebral palsy drawings.



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]