β17320956[Quote]
SALT I KNOW YOU ARE HERE, PLEASE JUST TELL ME WHAT YOU DID TO EVERYONE ELSE, WHY AM I THE ONLY ONE FORCED TO BE HERE?
β17320958[Quote]
>>17320942Have you considered BBC therapy?
β17320967[Quote]
>>17320840what is the name of that anime girl?
β17320972[Quote]
>>17320964Who is your friend
β17320973[Quote]
>>17320956I took them away and replaced them with bots, maybe. Do you want your buddies back?
β17320975[Quote]
op what do see in your walls
β17320996[Quote]
open xhem
β17321010[Quote]
>>17321003me i like anime
β17321046[Quote]
>>17321027evangelion is my favorite
β17321054[Quote]
I AM FUCKING DONE SALT YOU ARE A FUCKING COWARD SENDING BOTS TO REPLY TO ME INSTEAD OF DOING SO YOURSELF STUPID NIGGER I WONT SURRENDER TO YOU I WILL FIND MY FRIENDS AND BRING THEM BACK HERE YOU WILL NOT BREAK ME
β17321073[Quote]
MY FRIENDS IF YOU ARE READING THIS I AM SORRY FOR TAKING SO LONG TO BRING YOU BACK YOU MEAN A LOT TO ME AND I PROMISE SALT WON'T WIN, I WILL NEVER EVER GIVE UP UNTIL WE FINALLY REUNITE
β17321077[Quote]
I encountered Labov and Waletzky's original article (1967/this issue, henceforth L&W) in the context of very specific problems in working with qualitative textual data. It was 1983, and I was a (not so young) postdoctoral fellow wrestling with talk about marriage, in the form of transcripts of interviews with more than 100 separating and divorcing women and men. My sociological training in research methods called for fragmenting the data in service of interpretation (Strauss, 1987) and, accordingly, I was moving through the lengthy interviews cutting, categoriz- ing, and grouping responses into a common set of thematic elements.
A recently separated man challenged my fragmentation efforts: responding to an interview question asking for the "reasons for his separation," he laughed and said, "Well, you know, that's a real long story. Maybe I can sum it up by saying…." He then gave a list of complaints. Only later did I realize the full significance of his message: He had knitted the disparate events of his marriage into "a real long story," but traditional social science methods of interviewing and coding fragmented and decontextualized them (Mishler, 1986). The insight, and an alternative way to approach interviews, crystallized when I was handed Labov's (1982) paper on personal narratives of violence by my postdoctoral mentor, Elliot Mishler. From that paper-which transformed forever my way of working with textual data-I worked my way back to L&W.
The fundamental structures of oral versions of personal experience, and their functions, provided a way into the "long stories" about divorce. In addition to healing biographical discontinuities (Bury, 1982) and facilitating the construction of identities, I also came to see how stories justify decisions to divorce (Riessman, 1990). That women and men needed to go to such narrative lengths to explain to the listener what "really happened" in their marriages (our questions did not ask
β17321086[Quote]
what does op think of the UN
β17321093[Quote]
HAVE MY THREAD, FUCK YOU ALL DISGUSTING FUCKING CHATGPT ABOMINATIONS, THIS WON'T END HERE THOUGH I PROMISE I WILL BE BACK
β17321145[Quote]
we took over his thread. 3 HURRAHS FOR EVERONE WHO SCARED HIM OFF
β17321159[Quote]
beep boop
β17321161[Quote]
11100010111100101101001
β17321162[Quote]
itt we nonsensepost for gegs
β17321183[Quote]
Take the mmcsiwniggers