№17231907[Quote]
>>17231884 (OP)Because God said so. Kill yourself destinycuck.
№17231911[Quote]
because it's gross and will cause genetic defects
№17231944[Quote]
That scenario is bad because they're gay. If it was a brother and sister it'd be fine though.
№17231948[Quote]
>>17231911>because it's grossnot an argument
>cause genetic defectsit is impossible for 2 men to create children so this is not a valid point
>>17231907>god said soappeal to authority
№17231971[Quote]
>>17231948>2 malesbeing a faggot is bad
№17231976[Quote]
>>17231971now explain why being a faggot is bad
№17231985[Quote]
>>17231884 (OP)we used to stone niggers like you
№17231990[Quote]
>>17231948god is the ultimate authority on good and bad doe
№17231995[Quote]
>>17231990prove god exists
№17232012[Quote]
>>17231985Not an argument
>>17231995Not an argument
№17232013[Quote]
>>17231976it spreads HIV and other sexual diseases, leads to anal incontinence and poop
№17232019[Quote]
>>17232013Not an argument
№17232032[Quote]
>>17231948bleed destinynigger
№17232041[Quote]
>>17232013HIV and sexual diseases is not exclusive to faggots
>>17232021animals can't consent
№17232055[Quote]
bleed out and die, sodomite
№17232056[Quote]
>>17232021The dog may be mentally harmed by it
№17232059[Quote]
>>17231995God exists because his son, Jesus Christ, rose from the dead.
№17232069[Quote]
>>17232055not an argument
>>17232059prove jesus rose from the dead
№17232076[Quote]
>>17232041you need to explain why having a loosened out asshole doesnt cause a lower quality of life
>>17232019retard
№17232077[Quote]
>>17232069its literally in The Bible
№17232100[Quote]
>>17232076loosened assholes are not exclusive to faggots. plenty of heterosexual couples enjoy anal play.
>>17232077not an argument
№17232114[Quote]
>>17232100it is an argument, if god isnt real then why are humans so heckin smart and unlike any other animal on earth
№17232115[Quote]
>>17232100so we can both agree anak is bad, therefore faggots are also bad, therefore male on male incest is also bad
№17232121[Quote]
High effort post incoming
Think for yourself for one moment: Why is having sex with people outside your family even normal? Could you imagine us, as homosapiens, leaving our sisters to go off with random men and produce children? That's only a family weakness, as the man could possibly kill your sister or female relatives or whatever while they're gone to fuck.
On the other hand, if we were to commit incest, then this would mean our families would be strong and from the same lineage. Same bloodline, no different generational gaps or nothing else.
Our families would be tact by blood, leading to more trust. You also know your family well enough as you were raised around them, so it makes sense to commit incest.
The Jews have been doing this for millions of years. We were just conditioned to think that incest is bad and we were given a list of potential diseases and whatnot that could come from incest, but in reality; They're just parroted lies by Mr. Goldberg and his associates. They don't want us to have powerful families that stem from the same lineage, but instead, they want us to have branching families that come from all kinds of different backgrounds.
Imagine this: You're a boy and you have a brother and a sister. Your brother goes to marry a woman, your sister marries a man and both your brother and your sister bring children, and you end up getting married and you make a family for yourself as well and get kids. THIS MEANS YOUR FAMILY IS BRANCHING INTO 3 OTHER FAMILIES INSTEAD OF ONE BIG FAMILY.
If we knew history, we'd know that thisis terrible. Having your family branch out this much means there's more room for betrayal and a lack of power in general as you are now apart of a "new" family
№17232123[Quote]
>>17232100So you only proved sodomy is bad in all cases.
№17232125[Quote]
>>17232076>retardAd hominem
№17232136[Quote]
>>17232100>anal playthis nigga is actually a porn addict, no one fucking calls it that
№17232155[Quote]
>>17232115>>17232123homosexual does not require mandatory anal sex. there could be homosexual couples that do not have anal sex so you would not have a problem with these homosexuals
>>17232114evolution
>>17232136not an argument
№17232172[Quote]
>>17232162not an argument
№17232192[Quote]
incest, beastiality,….. whatever the fuck are all bad bc it goes against the intended design of humans. We were given hands, mouths, sexual organs, boobs and hips for foid to use. Deviating outside of this is debasing yourself. This is way sodomy is also inherently bad
№17232193[Quote]
>>17232155evolution ebendoe exactly 0 (zero) other animals on earth are even slightly similar to humans in behavior
№17232197[Quote]
>>17232121inbreeding will rape your genes
№17232203[Quote]
>>17232181Not an argument
№17232211[Quote]
>>17232162why are they doing this?
№17232213[Quote]
>>17232192appeal to nature
>>17232193dolphins and apes exhibit high levels of intelligence
№17232220[Quote]
>>17232192>goes against the intended design of humansSource?
№17232243[Quote]
>>17232226Yeah this is literally a bait thread that's the point, if anyone is sincerely trying to discuss ethics on soy they're mentally retarded
№17232245[Quote]
>>17232211it's a pederast
№17232250[Quote]
>>17232155even if sodomy physically harms people, there's no principle we can derive from the universe that would prove the physical suffering of human beings is of any objective moral weight. human suffering is morally neutral as is everything else regardless of whether or not two disagreeing parties think otherwise
№17232252[Quote]
>>17232226Also not an argument
№17232259[Quote]
Not fond of the influx of incestfags on this website lately
№17232262[Quote]
>>17232192elaboration
incest creates crippled nigger babies hence why we evolved not to do it
beastiality doesnt create babies hence why normal people are repulsed by it
№17232288[Quote]
>>17232261this is terrifying
op are you ok?
№17232289[Quote]
>>17232259appeal to emotion
>>17232261ad hominem
>>17232262not all incest results in the creation of a child
№17232308[Quote]
>>17232282It's neutral
>>17232289Fallacy fallacy
№17232311[Quote]
>>17232213Have you ever seen a dolphin or ape think about the future or develop any form of philosophy like humans do? Do they appreciate the beauty of life like humans do by creating art, building monuments and having morals?
№17232314[Quote]
Because hookup sex is the degradation of respect for gender. Homosexuality and casual sex do nothing for society and turn people into narcissists, who actively harm society for their own benefit. The only times humanity progresses is when this stuff is outlawed and most efforts go to society as a collective.
Examples: Weimar Germany, end of Rome, the west currently
№17232318[Quote]
>>17232289in the same way eating rotten food doesnt guarantee death
№17232329[Quote]
>>17232261wow ive never seen a beating so brutal in a gore video usually its just some nigger screaming while getting beaten with tree branches
№17232335[Quote]
File: fem.mp4 📥︎ (1.03 MB, 480x640) 8632a688f728ee9423975551915a437e0ImgOps
eat shit and die
>arrow because i'm not a hanging tranny
№17232348[Quote]
>>17232329its quite sad actually
>>17232335this is fetish porn btw
№17232354[Quote]
itt we spam this thread with Template:HyperDoctos from the 'ki because op is a nigger
№17232376[Quote]
The easiest answer to op is that it's degenerate, first off its gay sex and second its incest. Both of these erode family values required to uphold a society and break the morals we've developed over thousands of years.
№17232380[Quote]
>>17232354>i lost the argument so I'm going to deflect this thread with spam and resort to ad hominem i won this debate
№17232402[Quote]
>>17232348the person getting beaten in that video probably deserved it
South American cartels don't capriciously target random well-meaning civilians
№17232412[Quote]
incest is good but faggotry is bad
>why
because I said so
№17232416[Quote]
>>17232380i didn't even engage with the thread's topic geg use your brain
№17232431[Quote]
>>17232412people will get mad at this but it is an accurate (albeit individualistic) distillation of human morality
№17232451[Quote]
>>17232431even though I disagree (faggotry is morally permissible, incest is bad)
№17232524[Quote]
>>17232500failtroll nigger discord users who need to be expunged from the site immediately, but Salt refuses to crack down
№17232533[Quote]
>>17232524It's time to start using integrity.js and hardware banning >40% of the site
№17232549[Quote]
>>17232524nigga stop yapping. salt is american freedom fighter
№17232560[Quote]
>>17232500Why do
(((they))) fill all mainstream media with anti-incest propaganda and fear mongering while practicing it themselves?
№17232610[Quote]
>>17232549Salt's libertarian minimalist philosophy worked spectacularly for like a week before the site was promptly raped by the worst (Brown) people from the worst elements of the Internet non-stop as is evident by this very thread
we need to re-ban gore on /soy/ and hardware ban everybody who is even slightly suspicious, as i said
№17232635[Quote]
not a single person ITT has provided a strong argument for why incest is morally wrong
№17232645[Quote]
>>17232610i have been using the party since the near-end of Froot's admin it has not been this bad in a while
№17232655[Quote]
>>17232524maybe it really is da fuggen cord
№17232659[Quote]
>what is wrong with the above scenario?
that it's gay but other than that nothing
№17232674[Quote]
>>17232610brown people were also here under Quote doe, they just spammed porn instead of gore
№17232690[Quote]
>>17232635because we dont know what you consider morally right
№17232693[Quote]
Why do nusoishits fall for this bait
№17232698[Quote]
>>17232610actually we shouldn't even ban gore on /soy/, we should just make it IAS only
№17232700[Quote]
>>17232674the degeneracy and the porn was a different category of problem. this is also a problem, but it's a more serious problem because failtrolls filling the sharty's servers with links to 'p is illegal and hosting furry porn is not
№17232703[Quote]
saging this brim btw
№17232739[Quote]
>>17232635I posted one>>17232635
№17232750[Quote]
>>17232698perhaps making /gem/fagging relevant again could be useful also. start handing gempasses out more often based on activity telemetry collected by integrity.js (probably already happening) and revive /gem/
The nigger failtrolls piss me off and are worse than trans Quotist janny cabalists
№17232769[Quote]
>>17232690So you believe in subjective morality?
№17232784[Quote]
>>17232757yap yap yap i'll still be a homosexual
№17232787[Quote]
>>17232769i dont but youre an atheist so you have to believe in it
№17232833[Quote]
>>17232802>homosexuality is wrong because… because it just is, okay?!We should publicly shame FAGGOTS who spread "pride" and talk about their sexual orientation and and groom children but why should society or the State care about what they do in private?
№17232835[Quote]
>>17232787Most atheists don’t actually believe in subjective morality
№17232857[Quote]
>>17232835Which is how you get secular realism. the most niggerlicious philosophy ever made whose adherents are all 105 IQ university professors who NEED racism to be so bad that even the universe itself disagrees with the hecking chuds
№17232860[Quote]
>>17232835what other morality is there for atheists? anything else is literally impossible
№17232871[Quote]
nusois cant stop falling for bait
№17232907[Quote]
>>17232610god i can not describe how much of a faggot i think you are.
I was pro quotist dammit and the hearty was beginning to depress me. We have are going uphill again. There is hope and gems again.
№17232917[Quote]
>>17232860some atheists (and an outright majority of college-educated philosophers iirc) believe that morality is factually objective (slavery and racism are wrong) and us steadily progressing as a society is indicative of convergence on and discovery of the moral truths of the universe.
№17232926[Quote]
>>17232860Secular Moral Realism
№17232930[Quote]
Salt nu sharty ladies and gentelmens
№17232942[Quote]
unironically i dont mind threads like this because it encourages discussion. just kind of wish the topic wasn't so taboo
№17232957[Quote]
>>17232917why the fuck does progressing as a society even matter to them? theyre gonna die and there wont be any society, theres no reason not to be a hedonist if youre atheist
№17233007[Quote]
>>17232942Knowledge hides in uncomfortable topics
№17233011[Quote]
>>17232957That's how atheists act
And atheists also would be more likely to do gay incest
№17233042[Quote]
Pornbrained goy go down
№17233055[Quote]
Incest is bad because it ruins the sibling relationship with a dark corruption and can lead to dysgenics.
№17233084[Quote]
>>17233005This is why people argue that leftism and universalism has roots in Christianity
№17233180[Quote]
>>17233055You haven’t seen the wholesomeness of true sibling love and instead believe the jewish fearmongering while the very pushers of anti incest propaganda practice incest themselves it’s only the goyim that are forbidden form doing it
№17233225[Quote]
>>17233180Dysgenic rat kikes shouldn't be your number one role model.
№17233227[Quote]
>>17233180Incest is so obviously jewish
№17233264[Quote]
>>17233225>>17233227And yet they are wiping the floor with you goyim
№17233270[Quote]
>>17233225incest does not necessitate the procreation of incest babies. birth control
№17233279[Quote]
Counter question, but would YOU fuck your adult brother with concern? If not why
№17233292[Quote]
*concent
№17233304[Quote]
>>17233279no because it's disgusting but i do not base my morality on my feelings
№17233332[Quote]
i don't fuck my brother out of a sense of morality, but out of a sense of disgust
№17233344[Quote]
>>17232957I am agnostic (raised Catholic) and not an Atheist (religion is incredibly useful and socially productive), but I will answer.
I value my own happiness and I value meaning. I do not believe that generating meaning in my life is possible without imposing limits on myself and I believe that much is true independent of whether or not that moral judgment is cosmically underwritten.
№17233348[Quote]
Fuggen autocorrect
№17233352[Quote]
>>17231884 (OP)for the gays, they make up 52% of HIV cases. sodomy is unnatural by design wether you believe in theism or evolutionary design, the body parts used are clearly not made to go together. to carry the act out the individuals require drugs to make it even possible, its also extremely dirty.
№17233372[Quote]
>>17233352I agree with dis
№17233376[Quote]
>>17233352appeal to nature fallacy
№17233382[Quote]
>>17233283the jews are wincestmaxxing while you believe their gatekeeping techniques goyim lost
№17233384[Quote]
>>17233376Is he wrong doe
№17233385[Quote]
>>17231943sodomy is clearly against natural design and requires all the drugs and precautions and cleaning. its dirty. most people are poor and dont have access to any of this. the hiv rates are off the roof, so it just takes up tax money to treat these gay people.
every doctor will tell u to not stick your finger as far up your ear or down your throat, that goes against design and can bring harm. so why isnt it the same for this disturbing sexual act?
Sodomy: think for a second, if you require a lot of healthcare, drugs, cleaning and precution simply to have sex, which most people do normally every day, are u not put off??
№17233386[Quote]
>>17231907The children of adam and eve had incestuous sex with each other
№17233400[Quote]
>>17233386Did they have choice not to?
№17233412[Quote]
>>17233385appeal to nature fallacy
№17233428[Quote]
>>17233400Maybe God could have given them more options if he didn’t want them to shag
№17233442[Quote]
for the gays, they make up 52% of HIV cases. sodomy is unnatural by design wether you believe in theism or evolutionary design, the body parts used are clearly not made to go together. to carry the act out the individuals require drugs to make it even possible, its also extremely dirty.
№17233449[Quote]
>>17233385>sodomy is clearly against natural designSays who? Who or what determines which human behaviors are in accordance with our "natural design?" Do you want to be the one who draws the line in the sand and says "the universe endorses this much and no more"?
№17233456[Quote]
>>17233412how is that a fallacy doe.
>hey giga im fucking my wifes ear<nigga what the hell>appeal to nature fallacy doe №17233462[Quote]
>>17233412What answer do you want nigga? Oh wait it doesn't matter what argument that is since you can just discard it cuz its some kind of fallacy
№17233485[Quote]
ADD ME ON DISCORD IF U WANT A DEBATE
MY POSITION - REACTIONARY CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST
templar_7777
№17233494[Quote]
nigga op you questioned this wrong the scenario should have been a sterile brother and sister
(its still very wrong doe, why? bc god said so)
№17233497[Quote]
>>17233485are you for or against it?
№17233514[Quote]
>>>17233485
>are you for or against it?
Obv against it
№17233528[Quote]
>>17233453Oh shit I didn’t know this post was supporting incest
№17233533[Quote]
>>17233449>>17233449I gave the explanation
Do u believe in natural design??
№17233542[Quote]
>>17233529LOL i just know ur a 500 pound weeb.
№17233552[Quote]
>>17233533I don't believe that nature has any objective moral properties associated with it or that our "design" is metaphysical or purposeful in some way.
№17233562[Quote]
>>17233539So u refute urself bcuz u js told me natural law cant be defined, yet u believe in NL
№17233591[Quote]
>>17233449If i am out with my gf camping i can go right there and fuck her pussy whitout problem, it creates its own lubricant and even has a space form the fucking cum to go.
If i am a faggot and wanna fuck while camping i have to hope he showered before or im gonna get shit on my dick. I also have to bring lubricant with me, and when im done he will start leaking afterwards. Works like intended huh!
№17233593[Quote]
>>>17233533
>I don't believe that nature has any objective moral properties associated with it or that our "design" is metaphysical or purposeful in some way.
So u dont believe in natural design.
№17233598[Quote]
Nigga just say you want to fuck your brother
№17233601[Quote]
>>17233552>>17233533Would pedophilia be correct if nature allowed it
№17233609[Quote]
Incest is unholy
№17233628[Quote]
Add this ds acc, debating on this fruitcake app is foolish
pendu_7249_95340
№17233636[Quote]
>>>>17231990
>>prove god exists
Add me on ds and i will tommorow
№17233654[Quote]
>W.joseduthie@gmail.com
№17233656[Quote]
not bait just snca and yes I agree sex between two consenting adults is fine as long as it doesn't produce a child that will suffer being a retard.
It's none of anyone's business what people do in private as long as nobody is harmed and it's consensual
№17233670[Quote]
>>17233636bro you dont have to put your email in the email field
№17233684[Quote]
because it's antisocial behavior and problematic power imbalances
№17233697[Quote]
>>17233656What if they eat eachother
№17233711[Quote]
>>17233697then that harms someone
№17233723[Quote]
>>17233711But they concent to it
№17233740[Quote]
>>17233711Also how does you define harm? Anak sex is also harming technically
№17233746[Quote]
>>17233728Then get to saging nuswa
№17233752[Quote]
>>17233678geg put your phone in a stand instead of holding it like that
№17233754[Quote]
>>17233591It's not a reproductive function and has deleterious effects on parties participating and so what? that descriptive fact has no bearing on the "morality of sodomy", for the same reason the universe doesn't opine on murder or any other human suffering (explicitly personalistic distillation of the realist argument but still).
№17233759[Quote]
>>17233670Im just making an account here, what's wrong
№17233800[Quote]
because people in a family are naturally averse to sexual attraction toward one another
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect №17233814[Quote]
cumskins dont even fuc.k. their sisters by many like us BHARATBVLLS
№17233828[Quote]
>>17233800Why do people fuck their cousins then?
№17233830[Quote]
>>17233740I'm not going to discuss the semantics of "harm" because my argument doesn't rely on them. You and I both know that anal sex isn't considered harmful compared to fucking eating someone
№17233850[Quote]
>>17233830people can die from anal prolapses, also very common for someone to get stds from anal sex
№17233852[Quote]
>>17233828You hardly spend time with your cousins, this effect applies to people you grow up with.
№17233862[Quote]
>>17233385people usually don't grow up with cousins like siblings and parents
it's also gross to most people that aren't jeets and arabs
№17233866[Quote]
>>17233754perhaps, but it is very clear it is against natural intent
№17233872[Quote]
>>17233862meant to reply to>>17233828
№17233873[Quote]
>>17233830What if they eat some dead body they dug up from a graveyard? Is that wrong
№17233911[Quote]
>>17233850As I said, a little nuance helps you see that anal sex is not harmful compared to eating someone. Has anyone ever eaten someone without killing them in the act or beforehand?
№17233942[Quote]
>>17233911anal sex is more harmful than eating someone
№17233947[Quote]
OP, can you answer this?
What is wrong with necrophilia if the person's body you have sex with consents before death?
What if they don't consent at all before dying? Do you count that as rape or not? They can't really experience it or get the trauma or long term harm that rape usually brings if they are dead
№17233952[Quote]
>>17233911You can eat certain part of a body and it will still stay alive
№17233973[Quote]
>>17233952And, on average, how harmful is that compared to anal sex?
№17233992[Quote]
>>17233973Idk, can you say to me?
№17234001[Quote]
>>17233911after too much anal sex you need to wear a fucking tampon to prevent it from leaking. Also that shit is painful and can leave permanent damage
>inb4>but… you wont die from it! №17234009[Quote]
>>17233973In theory it could be less
№17234058[Quote]
>>17233992I think that eating someone isn't safe whilst anal sex is safe, therefore, when comparing the two, I can call one harmful (eating someone) and one not harmful (anal sex)
№17234075[Quote]
GIGAOMEGA BAIT that raped nusois
№17234092[Quote]
>>17234058But more people died from after effects of anal sex than from eating certain body parts
№17234105[Quote]
>>17234075Its called a discussion
№17234124[Quote]
>>17234001>after too much anal sex you need to wear a fucking tampon to prevent it from leaking.source
№17234147[Quote]
>>17234092If we compare the two practices in general (the average anal sex vs. the average cannibalism), which one are you more likely to die from? I'd say that you are millions of times more likely to die from cannibalism
№17234158[Quote]
>>17234139apparently asking for evidence for claims is reddit behavior now, JSID
№17234166[Quote]
TND or BLM?
№17234182[Quote]
>>17234166neither, TCD (Total Criminal Death)
№17234196[Quote]
>>17234165So anal sex is safe whilst cannibalism is harmful
№17234230[Quote]
>>17234124nigga i cant look that shit up rn im on my sisters laptop
№17234241[Quote]
Incest is bad because children born to it are sped
№17234244[Quote]
Total Cobson Williams death
№17234256[Quote]
>>17234241incest doesn't have to result in a child if birth control is used
№17234325[Quote]
>>17234277Even doe cobson is mid tier soyjak
№17234351[Quote]
>>17234207okay
>picrel is you o algo
№17234357[Quote]
>>17234230>>17234251>Posting in an incest thread on your sister's laptopHow are you going to explain this to her when she looks through her history?
№17234367[Quote]
>>17234196Other way around
№17234383[Quote]
>>17233385>sodomy is clearly against natural designwhy is the male g spot(prostate) in the ass then?
№17234412[Quote]
>>17234383Cause its just moved there after the baby starts to form as a male
№17234435[Quote]
>>17234357no i can delete the history but my dad has something the router that detects nsfw traffic and then pings the pc or something like that
№17234445[Quote]
>>17234256birth control is a repercussion and not a natural thing. Many people don't even have access to it
№17234473[Quote]
wait genuinely this is a good question
№17234474[Quote]
>>17234383hitting the g spot is not important at all to make a men orgasm, while it is much more important for a foid
№17234492[Quote]
>>17231884 (OP)When will everyone realize that if we just rape and kill this person, instead of trying to “debate” him or however the vaushcuck rehearses the talking points, that the world will be a better place?
<More over, we should do this to every debatebro
№17234511[Quote]
>>17234383I just want to say that it's probably not intentional it's just that the digestive system and reproductive system overlap in some places
№17234515[Quote]
>>17234492Hitler would do this
№17234527[Quote]
>>17234412>its just moved therelike the testacles are, or the penis, or any other part of the genitals when the baby starts to form as male
№17234531[Quote]
qnqnqnqnqnqnqnqnqnqnqnqnqnqnqnqnqnqqnqnqnq
№17234541[Quote]
>>17234435How are you going to explain to your dad why you're posting in an incest thread?
№17234568[Quote]
>>17234539so how does your original point of it being against natural design hold up?
№17234582[Quote]
>>17234541by having sex with his sister ofc
№17234610[Quote]
>>17234568I didn't say this, I said that that the g spot being there doesn't mean that it should be used
№17234614[Quote]
>>17234492“ERMMM how is being a lolicon pedophilia? How is incest bad if it’s all consensual? How are non-Whites le bad when my breadtube-approved statistics suggest otherwise?”
Haha yeah, you’re right. Anyways, line up against the brick wall. We’re going to shoot you in the head.
№17234640[Quote]
>>17234541sharty isnt pinged i tested it
№17234877[Quote]
cause gay sex is a sin