№17202022[Quote]
up
№17202023[Quote]
19
№17202053[Quote]
Some old niggas browsing
№17202075[Quote]
up
№17202080[Quote]
twenyone
№17202083[Quote]
nig
№17202133[Quote]
>pushing 30 and on the sharty
№17202134[Quote]
Someone said under 13 hopefully that's a joke geg
№17202169[Quote]
>>17202133Gonna be me in the future unless this place is jsid
№17202186[Quote]
Up so we can be datamined even more
№17202218[Quote]
17
17.65% (3 votes)
16
11.76% (2 votes)
19
11.76% (2 votes)
21
11.76% (2 votes)
>28
11.76% (2 votes)
<13
5.88% (1 votes)
13
5.88% (1 votes)
14
5.88% (1 votes)
18
5.88% (1 votes)
24
5.88% (1 votes)
27
5.88% (1 votes)
№17202322[Quote]
>>17202268NAHHHH getcho dusty ahh unc ahh outta here 💀 grown ass man btw 💀 DOCTOOOOOS HE ADMITTED TO TALKING TO TEENAGERS MOOOOODS
№17202383[Quote]
>4 votes for 16 and 17
JSID…
№17202420[Quote]
>three 14 year olds
>two 13 year olds
Salt shut it down
№17202454[Quote]
>>17202383still significantly older than the site's demographics used to be
in 2023 under kuz I remember a poll where everybody voted that they were like 12-15 and those that said 15 were called uncs, and people who were anything higher than that were called old weirdos talking to kids and told to get the fuck off the website
№17202507[Quote]
>>17202454>those that said 15 were called uncsMeds you couldn't admit to being under 16 at the time. I think I was 17 when I joined in 2022 personally.
№17202529[Quote]
>strawpoii
nusois…
№17202549[Quote]
>17 votes for underaged ages
JSID
№17202590[Quote]
18/31 votes are under 18
№17202601[Quote]
>>17202590I hope this is not the real ratio
№17202650[Quote]
>>17202507>Meds you couldn't admit to being under 16 at the timeyes you could geg
soot had a 16+ rule, kuz removed it and everyone admitted to being like 13, then froot added it back and the userbase all turned 16 apparently
№17202661[Quote]
so many old ass niggas
№17202672[Quote]
>>17202647Spamming doctos and asking to dox people they had disputes with on discord
№17202673[Quote]
>>17202650kek is this real
were kuzists all hypercacas?
№17202676[Quote]
>>17202650Meds that never happened
№17202742[Quote]
>>17202673yes geg, I got called unc for being 15 in 2023.
>>17202676take a look at the kuz era's ruleset
https://archive.is/SAd3Fnotice anything missing?
№17202784[Quote]
>>17202650>>17202742>when oldfags complain they're really just yearning for their youthBRVTAL
№17202797[Quote]
>>17202775probably because any given pedophilic joke would have just been about women their age
№17202808[Quote]
>>17202650So all the 13 year old cacas from back then are 16, makes sense
№17202830[Quote]
>>17202804This isn't really that different from the shit that gets posted now kek
№17202845[Quote]
>>17202804that's doll though
№17202846[Quote]
>>17202830yeah i scrolled down and there was trans girl inflation bait
№17202851[Quote]
>>17202804I'm so autistic that I can tell by the post number alone that this was early-mid doll
№17202860[Quote]
>>17202846the only difference between kuz's shardee and the shardee now is that people posted soyjaks under kuz
№17202877[Quote]
>>17202797that was unjokly the excuse most of the site would give back then. call someone a pedo for anything they said and they'd just go
>I'm 14 shut the fuck up retard №17202894[Quote]
>>17202877I really hate cacas that say they cant be a pedophile because they're a minor. Truly retarded shit
№17202910[Quote]
>>17202894I mean I don't think it's crazy for a 14 year old to find another 14 year old attractive
№17202938[Quote]
>>17202910Not what I meant, sorry for the confusion. I just mean large age gaps between cacas. For example a 7 year old and a 14 year old, that's basically pedophilia
№17202943[Quote]
>>17202938Oh yeah that's crazy
№17202997[Quote]
>>17202910tbh I don't think pedo jokes on their own are the worst thing ever either. I think it only becomes an issue when it goes from being an obvious joke to being a blatant dogwhistle.
like there's a difference between kids on the 'tok going "FREE DIDDY!!!" and lolipedos going "UUUUHOOOOOHO CUNNY!!!!". one of them is clearly not joking.
№17203018[Quote]
>>17202997Yeah I agree, same for OGD
№17203068[Quote]
Is it immoral for salt to know most of the userbase are cacas who can't be justifiably banned, but continue to allow porn and gore under the justification that the site is technically 18+ and they shouldn't be here anyway?
№17203087[Quote]
>>17203068I think if you make a site 18+ and ban anyone who says they're under 18 then it's fine to allow gore and stuff. You're not really to blame if people under 18 use the site at that point.
№17203093[Quote]
>>17203068it's not his job to look after a bunch of neglected kids who shouldn't even be here
№17203101[Quote]
Did the old thread get deleted?