/soy/ - Soyjaks

ı think I recognize that knife script from old scripting videos.

Is it the one that can turn into a katana?

>>17191001
its grab knife v3

>>17190989 (OP)
We say keyed here, nuswa

>>17191014
Can you give me the script? I need it for smth

Here's the script btw, if anyphono wants it and knows how to use it
require(0xA8AD8103):Run('user','i baked you a pie')

>>17191034
I used the actual lua version but a require works

>>17190989 (OP)
>based
<keyed

>>17191034
Also, are most trolling GUIs broken now? I remember trolling in snca RP games. I guess I need a backdoor now

Do the same but with the avatar of furries and groomers.

>>17191025
if your going to use it on games use a required version using whatever slopside you have

>>17191064
Yeah they got 'aped you need a backdoor to execute raisin phonos can see

>>17191081
geg why the fuck are the variables named like that?

>>17191122
Knife is called "bitch ass knife" GEEEEEEEEEGG

>>17191122
iirc all the grab knife scripts were made by some caca in 2016
so theres your answer

>>17191150
Is the code JUST for the grab knife? There's a projectile script in here.

>>17191165
the script has a throwing option

>based instead of keyed
Go away.

>>17191170
saying based instead of keyed prints reppeys doe

>>17191081
>function kysnigga()
KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK!!!!!!

>>17191168
Lemme check it out. Can I use my main? Gotta make sure It doesn't have something bad

op has a tinny little white pecker
it is very thin and very slender

when tyrone calls him he acquiesces
and when he finishes op tastes

once, his girlfriend let him fuck
now his black bull rapes his butt

after coitus he hopes to touch
but his clitty may only stay locked

well i've been told he wishes to stop
but his mistress knows no more white "cock"
xcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcx
so this is the lesson for today
the bnwo is here to stay
and op's asshole is forever gay

>>17191215
yeah

Introduction: Soyspeak as a Minor Language

soyspeak presents a fascinating case study for Deleuze and Guattari's linguistic theories, particularly their concepts of minor languages, order-words, and continuous variation. Far from being merely a "right-wing dog whistle" or an online slang, Soyspeak functions as what Deleuze and Guattari would call a minoritarian treatment of a major language—English—that operates through creative deterritorialization and establishes a distinct semiotic regime.

—

1. Soyspeak as a Minor Language

The Major/Minor Distinction

Deleuze and Guattari argue that "major" and "minor" do not designate different languages but rather two treatments of language:

"There are not, therefore, two kinds of languages but two possible treatments of the same language. Either the variables are treated in such a way as to extract from them constants and constant relations or in such a way as to place them in continuous variation." (p. 103)

Soyspeak exemplifies the minor treatment of English. It does not create a new language from scratch but instead deterritorializes English through systematic operations:

· Apostrophisation: Dropping first syllables ("'o" for "to," "'e" for "be")
· Mutation: Altering consonants based on preceding/following words ("the Sharty" for "the Party")
· Acronymisation: Compressing phrases into single words ("HWNBAG" for "he will never be a gem")

These operations constitute what Deleuze and Guattari describe as a "chromatic linguistics" that places linguistic elements in continuous variation:

"A secret language does not merely have a hidden cipher or code still operating by constants and forming a subsystem; it places the public language's system of variables in a state of variation." (p. 97)

The Double Movement of Minor Languages

Soyspeak displays the characteristic double movement of minor languages:

1. Poverty/Ellipsis: The dropping of syllables and creation of acronyms represents a "restriction of constants" (poverty)
2. Overload/Variation: The complex mutation rules and proliferation of forms represent an "extension of variations" (overload)

"Two conjoined tendencies in so-called minor languages have often been noted: an impoverishment, a shedding of syntactical and lexical forms; but simultaneously a strange proliferation of shifting effects, a taste for overload and paraphrase." (p. 104)

This is precisely what we see in Soyspeak: grammatical simplification combined with elaborate mutation rules that create a rich, shifting linguistic field.

—

2. The Order-Word Function

Language as Command, Not Communication

Deleuze and Guattari fundamentally challenge the view of language as informational or communicational:

"Language is made not to be believed but to be obeyed, and to compel obedience." (p. 76)

Soyspeak's self-description as an "international auxiliary language" that emerged from "persecution days" suggests it functions as what they call an order-word assemblage—not primarily to communicate information but to:

1. Establish group identity and signal membership
2. Create exclusionary boundaries ("to off-siters, soyspeak is known as the right-wing undertoned dog whistle")
3. Resist moderation (bypassing filters, avoiding wordfilters)

The creators of Soyspeak "shortening words permitted the poster to avoid wordfilters"—this is a practical application of Deleuze and Guattari's claim that:

"The order-word is itself the redundancy of the act and the statement." (p. 79)

Each Soyspeak utterance simultaneously:

· Says something
· Performs the act of belonging to the "soymunnity"
· Enacts resistance to external moderation

The Death Sentence of the Order-Word

Deleuze and Guattari argue that order-words carry "a little death sentence":

"Every order-word, even a father's to his son, carries a little death sentence—a Judgment, as Kafka put it." (p. 76)

Soyspeak's constant references to "death" and "dying" in its internal discourse ("he will never be a gem," "the gem that saved the Party" vs. "the coal that doomed the Sharty") manifest this dimension. The language creates a world where membership is marked by the ever-present possibility of exclusion, cancellation, or "death" within the community.

—

3. Soyspeak's Regime of Signs

The Postsignifying/Subjective Regime

Deleuze and Guattari distinguish several regimes of signs. Soyspeak appears to operate primarily in what they call the postsignifying or subjective regime, characterized by:

1. A point of subjectification: "the Sharty," the "soymunnity" as the origin of linguistic authority
2. Linear proceedings: The succession of "proceedings" (father-proceeding, hotel-proceeding, court-proceeding in Kafka's work)
3. The double turning away: Creating a space of "insider" language that turns away from the mainstream

>based
go back

>>17191314
saying based instead of keyed prints reppeys and this proves it