>>17112337i wasnt trying to mock anybody when i made
>>17111994i just thought that it was a funny image
i only made it "soy" because you are supposed to, and even then i twisted it a bit (no beard, eyebrows, closed mouth)
in that way its more of a "post-soyjak"
>Safe-sleazy i tried doing that (i was one of the people who forced mulletjaks last year) and nobody bought it
i suspect even the matchajak poster is one dude
>Third-worlders (especially fatties)just meximutt/brazilmutt/etc
>Redditorsnot distinct enough from soy
>Troonsdone and not interesting anymore except for obsessed chuds
<reddit spacei think the real thing thats important is just making images that seem funny. usefulness is not the only reason things catch on; it also has to be funny. if you get bogged down by all these categories and conventions of soyjakking, you just make dust. 'jaks that are funny, even in a 'so bad its good' kind of way will forever be better than some objectively perfect but unfunny soy, and i know that from firsthand experience.