â„–16654215[Quote]
Fuck off jew
â„–16654235[Quote]
>>16654232don't keep us waiting
â„–16654245[Quote]
isn't this variant banned on the booru for being pedoshit
â„–16654249[Quote]
>>16654211 (OP)only variant other than 'lita to be tagged "loli" without featuring anything mocking loliniggers award
â„–16654254[Quote]
>>16654245Nope, got unbanned
â„–16654263[Quote]
>>16654245Plus it was only banned from being uploaded to the gallery, the pre-existing smuglets where fine and you could post them to the forums without penalty
â„–16654283[Quote]
Disgusting swarthy mutt.
â„–16654293[Quote]
Kill yourself now obsessed faggot
â„–16654395[Quote]
NAS or something
â„–16654408[Quote]
>>16654398breaks zero rules though
â„–16654427[Quote]
>>16654408It's still intended to provocate people into thinking it does, that doesn't make it okay.
â„–16654440[Quote]
>>16654427Still, according the approver guidelines, It is completely allowed assuming it is not sexualized
â„–16654470[Quote]
>>16654440It may be allowed, but it's not morally correct, and you know this.
â„–16654481[Quote]
>>16654470I still see nothing wrong with it
â„–16654496[Quote]
>>16654481It's traced off artwork made by a well known pedophillic community, you saw the image above.
â„–16654592[Quote]
>>16654559ev&oe i did respond, it's a horrid variant because, like 'lita, its used by unironic smug pedophiles.
â„–16654600[Quote]
>>16654592you misunderstood my reppey
â„–16654609[Quote]
>>16654600yeah i see that now
â„–16654620[Quote]
>>16654526Still, there is nothing inherently pedophilic about smuglet
â„–16654651[Quote]
Smug smug smug smug smug smug
â„–16654661[Quote]
Gemerald