№16550128[Quote]
>>16550117 (OP)God created bbc or something to that effect
№16550137[Quote]
human suffering is fun, its all the fault of that stupid bitch foid Eve. You will be forgiven when you die doe
№16550145[Quote]
Its all done for the glory of God
For example, if there is an earthquake and tsunami that kills 10000 people, that not only shows wrath, but also justice.
№16550148[Quote]
we are gods abandoned litter
№16550150[Quote]
Christcucks lost
№16550187[Quote]
god was high on jenkem when he created the world that's why
№16550192[Quote]
>>16550117 (OP)Mossad thread DNI
№16550205[Quote]
>>16550117 (OP)Because Sin took over and this is all evil happens,Bad things happen because of this. If you want i will show other arguments This one is the basic argument.
№16550206[Quote]
>>16550145yes cause the literal infants who died totally deserved it
№16550234[Quote]
>>16550205he addressed this, he said that an all powerfull being should be able to make free will without evil or sin
№16550311[Quote]
>>16550235Tsmt,they are all Reddit immigrants
№16550330[Quote]
>>16550234The world is fallen,life is short considering the afterlife,Death is natural,if you are saved you get to live the paradise without suffering. Everyone knows about how death and suffering are natural,even le soyence
№16550366[Quote]
The child that dies early probably suffers way less than us in our lifetime. It is believed that children who die early are spared from the evils of this world and are taken into God's kingdom
№16550371[Quote]
>>16550206If God kills an Infant, why would I get mad
he makes all life and takes it away
№16550399[Quote]
go back
№16550438[Quote]
the bible is totally ahistorical albeit
>philistines in genesiswouldn't be in 1800bc Canaan
>Iron chariots in Joshuaits the bronze age, iron working wouldn't become utilized until after the bronze age collapse
>Canaan was a massive superpower of multiple city statemost of canaan was abandond ghost towns, or small cities with like 1000 people max
the only city that actually fits the discription was Hazor, which even then, most likely it suffered a internal conflict, none of the walls show signs of siege warfare, and most of the buildings that show damage are governmental buildings like palaces and temples
also canaan was ruled by egypt at the time
>but muh egyptians didn't write about their le hecking defeattrue but that's an extreme over simplification, Egyptians did write about their losses when complaining about their predecessors, and when they retook something, which if they did lose to moses would've at least been mentioned in any document, but its not
also theirs not even a single mention of millions of enslaved hebrews in any document…
>Solomon was a world renown kingyet no documents from the period mention him
>saints were said to rise when Jesus diedyet this is NEVER FUCKING MENTIONED in any records
>we have testaments of Jesusyet the oldest copies date to around 100 ad, and even then they are tiny miniscule fractions of the text, along with that, any other sources that aren't biblical, that mention jesus, are also from around a century later
also the prophesy of nebuchadnezzar invading Egypt in Isaiah, never happened, Egypt was never invaded by the neo-Babylonian empire, under any of its kings, let alone nebuchadnezzar
>>16550235if your asking, I think most people hate christcucks essentially making """"jaks"""" that are just giant walls of text above them, and a soyjak that may or may not be related, and that may or may not just be a repost, literal goyslop, I guess its not as bad as literal colorjak porn but….
№16550546[Quote]
>>16550438>if your asking, I think most people hate christcucks essentially making """"jaks"""" that are just giant walls of text above them, and a soyjak that may or may not be related, and that may or may not just be a repost, literal goyslop, I guess its not as bad as literal colorjak porn but…Ironically, you’re writing walls of texts
№16550581[Quote]
>>165504381.The cavemen in Canaan probably 2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua 3.It fell down internally then 4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached 5.Culture at that time was indifused and not as knew as after in the New Testament,also the names were different so there's a chance he might've been called another name 6.Spiritual things don't appear on actual records,it's not le archaeologic soystory 7.Christians were smaller
№16550591[Quote]
Pic or it didn't happen
№16550597[Quote]
freewill without no evil literally defeats the purpose of freewill. The earth is simply not perfect according to Abrahamic religions, but heaven is.
№16550609[Quote]
>>16550499nigger im not even religious
nophono cares about your religion threads just go talk about this on /pol/ like a nusoi
№16550617[Quote]
>>16550609Probably just some religion obsessed twitter user
№16550627[Quote]
>>16550597you can choose between eating apple or eating strawberries without the possibility of eating poop
№16550632[Quote]
>>16550117 (OP)God is the creator of the universe. He can do whatever He wants, even if it offends you.
№16550684[Quote]
>>16550674>thinks of child rape for no reasonprojection much
№16550688[Quote]
>>16550627Yeah, so? You are granted freewill so if you feel like it you can eat the poop
№16550697[Quote]
>>16550674Just let the fucking jakparty.soy die already it’s been almost 2 fucking years you retarded religion obsessed Reddit immigrant
№16550852[Quote]
>>16550581>1.The cavemen in Canaan probablyprobably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshuairon working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>3.It fell down internally thendespite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reachedas for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT №16550857[Quote]
>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>
>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>
>>3.It fell down internally then
>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>
>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>
>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>
>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550870[Quote]
>>16550684ok then why tf whenever a fucking Christian talks about why wouldn't atheists do bad things, do they mention
>why wouldn't you torture a babyam I the only one that thinks this is weird?
like seriously look up a video about this, and they most likely will use that point, not even kidding
№16550872[Quote]
"Christcuck" is probably the lamest "slur" there is.
It's just the name of the religion plus a basic insult, it's not even a pun. Do these people seriously lack creativity?
№16550875[Quote]
>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>
>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>
>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>
>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>
>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>
>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550879[Quote]
>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>
>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>
>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>
>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>
>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>
>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550882[Quote]
>>16550872ok christkike, nebuchadnezzar owns you
№16550883[Quote]
>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>
>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>
>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>
>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>
>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>
>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550894[Quote]
>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>
>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>
>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>
>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>
>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>
>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550903[Quote]
>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>
>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>
>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550912[Quote]
>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550920[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550924[Quote]
>>16550918I bet you felt so fucking clever writing this
№16550928[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550934[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550935[Quote]
dni
№16550945[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550947[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550956[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550957[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550959[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550961[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550972[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550983[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16550993[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16551004[Quote]
>>16551001
SAVING THIS MASSIVE, ASTRONOMICAL, ENORMOUS FAIL KEEEEEEEEEEEK
№16551005[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1.The cavemen in Canaan probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>probably should've been more descriptive, but lets go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>genesis specifically calls them the philistines, despite the fact that the philistines aren't from Canaan(most likely), they were most likely descendant from the Myceneans(greeks) due to a large amount of mycelian pottery found in the region, along with the fact that the levant in general was a very popular trade route through sea travel, in the ancient near east, along with that, the philistines wouldn't rise to power until after the bronze age collapse, which genesis is around 5000bce-1800bc, give or take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2.That could be the start of the production of Iron beggining with Joshua
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iron working would not start until after the bronze age colapse, because whilst iron was plentiful, without proper refinement, it would be useless, these advancements would not be fully realized until after the bronze age colapse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3.It fell down internally then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>despite the fact that the conquest narrative states that it fell due to conquest and was burned by fire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>4.Either it was lost or Egyptians didn't write as the former slaves moved far away and couldn't be reached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as for the first one, fair point, but I do want to illustrate that even certain thing Akhenaten and amun-ra which the Egyptians tried to erase, yet still couldn't, due to well us knowing about it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>secondarily, biblical Hebrew is very similar to many proto-Canaanite languages, such as Ugaritic, more importantly though the LITERAL land they are talking about in the book of joshua, was owned by the new kingdom of Egypt in 1300bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the others ones I don't see as arguments and just boil down to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT
№16551028[Quote]
>>16551026He forgot to quote me