Debate me Mccartneycuck

Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 14:14:11 №16545145 [View All][1][2][Quote]

112 posts and 32 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

Babyjak 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:40:59 №16545814 [Quote]

>>16545804
>They're traced from bad material
Making fiends, apple and onion and other gems are good material
>they're so hyperspecific that nobody who doesn't know the source material would want to use them
None of my jaks are like this, send proof if I'm wrong
>and they are way too thickly drawn
7 line thickness is the correct line thickness for soyjak outlines

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:42:01 №16545817 [Quote]

>>16545813
All of this (especially the first) also applies to you

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:42:02 №16545818 [Quote]

>>16545814
why would anyone ever use Apple and Onion soyjaks?

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:42:03 №16545819 [Quote]

>Making fiends, apple and onion and other gems are good material
>THEYRE GOOD BECAUSE THEYRE JUST GOOD, OKAY????????
>>16545793
ultimate hypocrisy

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:42:30 №16545821 [Quote]

>>16545819
If you have watched them you would know they are good. Also you ignored my other points

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:42:40 №16545822 [Quote]

>>16545817
I'm still not McCartneyGOD retard

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:42:56 №16545825 [Quote]

>>16545822
Why post his shitty poopsons

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:43:16 №16545828 [Quote]

File: snarkysnappyjak.png 📥︎ (15.85 KB, 696x850) ImgOps

>>>16545813 (You)
>All of this (especially the first) also applies to you

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:43:38 №16545831 [Quote]

File: IMG_2370.png 📥︎ (9.86 KB, 600x600) ImgOps

>>16545145 (OP)
Yeah yeah yeah whatever tipson btfo

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:45:34 №16545842 [Quote]

>>16545535
Who looks like this

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:45:35 №16545843 [Quote]

>>16545821
>Didn't adress my other points
I won

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:45:44 №16545844 [Quote]

>>16545842
Soyboys

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:46:02 №16545848 [Quote]

>>16545844
Soyboys look like drawings of vegetables?

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:46:08 №16545851 [Quote]

File: meleejak.png 📥︎ (14.43 KB, 613x758) ImgOps

>>>16545842
>Soyboys

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:46:39 №16545854 [Quote]

>>16545848
They have stubble, glasses and are bald which makes them mock soyboys

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:47:34 №16545857 [Quote]

>>16545851
Who is this mocking

Award 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:47:59 №16545858 [Quote]

>>16545854
I think you fundamentally misunderstand what makes a soyjak good. Just because something can be classified as IAS doesn't make it a soyjak award

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:48:06 №16545859 [Quote]

>>16545857
the person i quoted

Bobo 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:48:06 №16545860 [Quote]

>>16545857
Soyboys

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:49:06 №16545863 [Quote]

>>16545860
Soyboys look like… Oh wait it looks like every other soyjak variant with zero originality
>>16545858
If being IAS doesn't make something a soyjak why do IAS standards exist

Chud 06/23/26 (Tue) 15:50:17 №16545871 [Quote]

File: Oekaki.png 📥︎ (14.51 KB, 480x480) ImgOps