/soy/ - Soyjaks

That's not how consent works, actually. Saying that you want to be raped is actually not oxymoronic because you're just saying that you want someone to try to fuck you without asking for consent first. It doesn't matter if the raped is actually into it or not, it's still technically rape.

>>16411353
no

>>16411358
Yes. Literally look at the dictionary definition of rape, Multilingual and/or Bilingual Persons of Heritage from Non-English-Speaking Places nigger.

this might be the smartest frog post ive ever seen in my life

>>16411364
no

GEG froglee hasn’t shown up he knows I cooked with this one

>>16411342 (OP)
>If you’re raping someone who instead of fighting back, chooses to somehow rape you in return
Is raping someone in return not a way of resisting? If I fucked your ass without your consent, and you picked up your dragon BBC dildo like the frogsissy you are and shoved it in my ass, do you think that would not discourage me from my course or not be a form of resistance?

>>16411380
No because if you’re raping me in return, you’re not actually resisting my initial act of rape (making no efforts to pull away or injure me)
I don’t think it would be even anatomically possible for you to rape me in return, but even if it was, your choice to do so showcases that you’re ok with being sexually assaulted as long as you can return the favor, and my act of continuing the rape despite being raped myself means that I also consent to your act of rape.
Therefore, neither of us is being raped. It’s completely legal sexual intercourse.

>>16411398
>>16411380
no

>>16411398
>(making no efforts to pull away or injure me)
Why is you shoving a dildo up my ass mutually exclusive from this in this scenario? Moreover shoving a dildo up someone's ass can definitely injure someone.
>my act of continuing the rape despite being raped myself means that I also consent to your act of rape.
The one who was the original rapist can prioritize continuing to rape the other person while being unwilling to have a massive foreign object in their ass. Just like the one originally being raped they can also make simultaneous efforts to continue raping while attempting to avoid being raped, it isn't mutually exclusive.

Test

>>16411426
You have no way of knowing whether the hypothetical dildo will dissuade me.
If your dick is still inside my ass and mine is inside of yours, neither of us is making an effort to pull away from our assailant, thereby making the interaction consensual. Both of us believe the act of raping the other is worth the sacrifice of getting raped in return.
This conversation is getting too gay, let’s stop.

>>16411438
You aren’t froglee.

>>16411434
You recognized inflicting injury as a valid form of resisting rape 15 minutes prior and now you're implying that the only qualification for resisting rape is making an effort to pull away. This is frankly untenable even with a quick check against common sense. If I cornered you in a tight closet space, and began raping you, would you rather try to pull away with nowhere to go, or fight back by trying to injure me? Would the latter somehow not be resisting rape and actually be consensual? What if you tried injuring me by shoving a dildo into my ass? There is nothing about rape in the scenario outlined here >>16411380 that necessitates it being a a voluntary exchange instead of rape being the means by which another's rape is resisted, allowing for both people to be simultaneously raping each other.
>This conversation is getting too gay, let’s stop.
Intellectual cowardice. You made this thread, now you own up to it.

Talmud ahh debates

>>16411498
no