№16381992[Quote]
I’m against porn spam and I don’t make exceptions for muh heckin Ukranian fat retard’s gaping asshole
№16381994[Quote]
>>16381992aryan behaviour
№16382033[Quote]
>>16382000he's not obsessed with making himself known, he literally only namefag in ONE post, the fame is just a byproduct (evendoe he definitely gets too much attention from xis posts)
It's definitely not coal, in fact i think its one of the gemmier giga edits of all time, this is a nothingburger argument
And he's morally superior to most spamcoallers due to spamming actual gems instead of snca tranime or epi slop
№16382039[Quote]
>>16381992It's in the video for like .5 seconds this is SNCA
№16382040[Quote]
>>16382033He will do it more, he already calls himself yesgigger in threads
№16382044[Quote]
>>16382033>he literally only namefag in ONE post, the fame is just a byproductspamming brimmy advertisements in every thread, wanting yourself to be known as "yesgigger" etc is fucking name fagging
>It's definitely not coal, in fact i think its one of the gemmier giga edits of all time, this is a nothingburger argumentIt's coal.
>And he's morally superior to most spamcoallers due to spamming actual gems instead of snca tranime or epi slopepi on an 18+ site? also he's morally superior to no one
№16382046[Quote]
>>16382040probably because literally everyone else calls him that. it just makes sense since thats what xes known for. its not really a real name(fag) since its just describing xis posts
№16382056[Quote]
>>16382046Porn thread and making himself identifiable doe, he's clearly a namefag
№16382061[Quote]
The things you guys consider "Porn" aren't explicit enough. Also if It's funny porn will probably stay up like that pepe image or cado
№16382066[Quote]
>>16382039It should be in the video for 0 seconds
№16382079[Quote]
>>16382066also this, how are you going on a moral crusade against porn whilst avatarfagging a video with porn in it?
№16382081[Quote]
>spamming brimmy advertisements in every thread
Where nigga
>It's coal.
i cant really argue against something subjective like "are his posts coal", but i just dont agree nigga
>epi on an 18+ site?
I mean, a lot of users are still minors post-cacacaust (according to limeleaks, but who knows if they were troo). But i guess EPI doesn't really exist on the sharty anymore. However its still tranime porn slop
№16382085[Quote]
>>16382066Cado won obsessed kike
№16382088[Quote]
>>16382061Porn isn’t funny you’re just gay and unironically like gay porn while having a double standard and seething about anything suggestive about women
№16382089[Quote]
>>16382056>Porn threadnigawatt
№16382095[Quote]
>>16382066Troo, but its a nothingburger. I dont like 'cado either
№16382096[Quote]
>>16382089Meant namefagging in da anti porn thread
№16382101[Quote]
>>16382081>Where niggadon't pretend you haven't seen it, at the bottom of his posts he'll send some snca link
>I mean, a lot of users are still minors post-cacacaustthat's on them then, they know it's an 18+ site
>However its still tranime porn slopironically it has more value than repetitive spam in every thread
№16382111[Quote]
>>16382044How are you niggers so buckbroken by this guy? He does nothing but post 2 videos.
>>16382088When did I say any of this? I'm just giving you all the Snopes-verified Facts.
№16382117[Quote]
>>16382111im not buckbroken, but shitting up the website is le bad
№16382121[Quote]
>>16382101(not the one you replied to)
>don't pretend you haven't seen it, at the bottom of his posts he'll send some snca linkthose are just game links. totally harmless. i'd even consider it good
>ironically it has more value than repetitive spam in every threadporn brings negative value
spam is just neutral or slightly negative
№16382140[Quote]
>>16381980 (OP)What if I want to jerk off to porn
№16382142[Quote]
>>16382134basically what every yesgigger hater is saying honestly
№16382143[Quote]
>>16382140then that's not the website for it, nusoi
№16382144[Quote]
>>16382121>those are just game links. totally harmless. i'd even consider it goodi never said they caused harm, but no matter what cross thread advertising is coal and brings the overall post quality down, people can SEE the thread on the 'log
>porn brings negative valuedepends on it's quality, the sharty is mostly goonhitlers (see all the 'cado shills)
>spam is just neutral or slightly negativespam is almost always negative
>>16382134shitty strawman, but bait can be entertaining, tell me how the fuck spam is entertaining
№16382153[Quote]
>>16382142they really do dis geg
№16382156[Quote]
>>16382143Yes it is I jerk off to soyjak porn a lot
№16382157[Quote]
>>16382140THEN DO IT SOMEWHERE ELSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
№16382158[Quote]
>>16382151Where giga chad
№16382161[Quote]
>>16382157No I want soyjak porn not normal porn not furry porn not mlp porn not porn porn
№16382197[Quote]
>>16382144>it brings the post quality downit's a fucking imageboard, what do you expect? there wasn't a similar outrage to the time where there were a thrembillion "what's your fetish" threads.
>depends on it's quality, the sharty is mostly goonhitlers (see all the 'cado shills)are you serious? are you really saying that porn can be good?
>spam is almost always negativenot as negative as porn
>shitty strawman, but bait can be entertaining, tell me how the fuck spam is entertainingpeople literally say this geg
№16382199[Quote]
>>16382186That website is outdated this one has better faps
№16382207[Quote]
‘Cado being allowed just because of its heckin shock value totally doesn’t lead to an insanely slippery slope where the rules of this website don’t have completely arbitrary exceptions and don’t actually mean anything
№16382208[Quote]
>>16382197whats your fetish is funny doe
№16382217[Quote]
I have jerked off to nikocado avocado's gaping asshole
№16382222[Quote]
>>16382197>it's a fucking imageboard, what do you expect?you can use this same argument for porn, which you're against, imageboards can be gemmy
>there wasn't a similar outrage to the time where there were a thrembillion "what's your fetish" threads.because those are 1 thread on the log, at most it's a posted it again award, it's not even comparable
>are you serious? are you really saying that porn can be good?yes, that's exactly what im saying
>not as negative as pornobjectively subjective
>people literally say this gegit's a weakened version of what they say, also known as a strawman
№16382226[Quote]
>>16382208i can only speak for myself, but i didn't find it funny. not at all
№16382231[Quote]
>>16382117You metafaggots (aka. Selfish Little Fucks) can whine about things that are "shitting up the website" all you want, nothing will ever change. Spam and bait will continue to permeate on this website for as long as it lives. No amount of rulescucking and catering will ever change that. What (You) can do is focus on the issues that (You) care about and that (You) can help fix without the help of a Janitor. But none of you will do that, because you're all Selfish, Whiny little Faggots who don't want any change.
№16382235[Quote]
I agree with what that one guy is saying about 'cado being a slippery slope, but i think that in the case with yesgigger its not really an issue. The solution would just be for yesgigger to make a non-cado version of the video and continue using that one. It would literally solve both sides problems
№16382253[Quote]
>>16382231>You metafaggotsim not a metafaggot, i dont think the shitty is bad or being ruined or whatever
>Spam and bait will continue to permeate on this website for as long as it livesdoesn't make it any less coal
>No amount of rulescucking and catering will ever change thatkind of lucky it's breaking the already established rules then
№16382278[Quote]
>>16382266
who knows geg, xe just wants to deflect
№16382298[Quote]
>>16382235Yes that’s the only issue I take with yesgigger.
I support his anti-porn crusade but find his inclusion of the ‘slot in the videos he spams to betray his purpose and expose evident hypocrisy.
№16382312[Quote]
>>16382298I agree with you! A settlement has been made!
№16382340[Quote]
67th reppey
№16382356[Quote]
>>16382349Stop posting porn
№16382362[Quote]
>>16382222>you can use this same argument for porn, which you're against, imageboards can be gemmyimo, porn is vastly different from a single YYYEEESSS-quote
>because those are 1 thread on the log, at most it's a posted it again award, it's not even comparableand with the YESgigger it's only 1 reppy per thread, which you quickly scroll by
>objectively subjectiveporn is objectively bad lol
>it's a weakened version of what they say, also known as a strawmannot even a strawman. they literally say this
i see we can't find a common denominator, so my advice is:
just fucking filter his filenames/filehashes. if you aren't mad about shitty bait, then you definitely shouldn't be mad about one singular reppy that's the same all the time
№16382369[Quote]
>>16382253>im not a metafaggot, i dont think the shitty is bad or being ruined or whateverMetafaggots is Plural. I wasn't referring only to you.
>doesn't make it any less coalTrue, but nothing will happen regarding it.
>kind of lucky it's breaking the already established rules thenI'm telling you this now, nothing will happen to Yesgigger or anyone else doing anything similiar. People have already tried and it has went nowhere.
№16382380[Quote]
>>16382362im not even mad about the spam, it's snca and i just ignore it, im mad that xe has this holier than thou mentality because xe does that spam, it's dehumanizing
№16382385[Quote]
>>16382368do dis so jartycucks have 1 less argument (that was shitty anyways)
№16382391[Quote]
>>16382369nothing will happen because the trannitors love the pph
№16382408[Quote]
>>16382386im going to take this at face value and believe you mean this unironically now
№16382413[Quote]
>>16382399and? am i wrong?
(i name everyone i don't like jartycucks because that's giga)
№16382416[Quote]
>>16382386but seriously doe just remove the shitty cado and make the world holier
№16382426[Quote]
>>16382391You're right, but the Joons don't care about the PPH, they just don't care enough to do anything about it.
№16382432[Quote]
>>16382380>holier than thou mentality because xe does that spam, it's dehumanizingi'm baffled that you are mad about this geg
№16382448[Quote]
>>16382432>im better than you because i spam snca 24/7, btw please support my causeit's so stupid i hate it
№16382497[Quote]
>>16382448>>im better than you because i spam snca 24/7, btw please support my causenot even nophono says this geg
he never said that he was a better human o algo
he just used his "fame" to change something in his favor
№16382508[Quote]
>>16382497and it's stupid that he thinks he's important
№16382525[Quote]
>>16382508meds?
when has he ever said that / hinted at that?
№16382570[Quote]
>>16382541that doesn't mean that he thinks he's important doey
№16382580[Quote]
>>16382570if he didn't think he's important he wouldn't make a thread "presenting himself" for some snca cause
№16382581[Quote]
it’s kinda pathetic that yesgigger thinks only he can make jannies care about and enforce rule 14 while also involving the ‘slot in the videos he spams
№16382598[Quote]
>>16382586Stop avatarfagging or ill urgent reported you
№16382600[Quote]
>>16382586ev&doe outside of /soy/ nobaldi knows you
№16382612[Quote]
>>16382600i actually know him outside of /soy/
№16382643[Quote]
>>16382627least obvious falseflag
№16382649[Quote]
>>16382638YYYYYESSSSSSSSSS
№16382651[Quote]
>>16382580hmm, i view it a little differently
i think there wasn't a great deceiving thought behind that
but oh well…
i gotta go now doey
№16382701[Quote]
>>16382677
you're not him buddy
№16382714[Quote]
>>16382677
niggergigger fake faggot kill yourself
№16382750[Quote]
>>16382735
nobody will remember you when you die.
№16382831[Quote]
>>16382802i think the quoting is getting to him, he might be starting to get confused
№16383387[Quote]
>>16381992Being an actual decent person is frowned upon in our world and it's a crying shame.