/soy/ - Soyjaks

Yes and mostly Stone Age, however Lot outside forces built Europe like Scythians and Semites

The only good thing that arose out of paganism is that they're fun to play as in crusader kings

>>16363727
yeah raiding christcucks is keyed

>>16363727
I wish I could play eu5 since I heard there was a way to revive ancient hellenism but my computer is too shitty for the game to run

>>16363694 (OP)
When you look at the pagan Saxons before Charlemagne forced them into Christianity, you have to throw out modern ideas about sexuality and gender identity entirely. Their culture didn't categorize people as 'gay' or 'straight,' but they did care deeply about social status and warrior masculinity. For a free Saxon man, taking the dominant role in a same-sex encounter was perfectly acceptable because it asserted power, but taking the passive role was considered the ultimate disgrace. They used the concept of ergi—which meant unmanliness or effeminacy—as a severe social insult that could lead to deadly duels. While we see glimpses of cross-dressing in their rituals and myths, like priests adopting female attire to perform specific types of magic, it was confined strictly to those spiritual spaces. Outside of rituals, if a man wore women's clothing or shirked his warrior duties, society viewed him with deep suspicion and shame. So while they didn't have strict church dogmas yet, their tribal honor system strictly enforced rigid, dominant gender roles.

>>>16363694 (OP)
>When you look at the pagan Saxons before Charlemagne forced them into Christianity, you have to throw out modern ideas about sexuality and gender identity entirely. Their culture didn't categorize people as 'gay' or 'straight,' but they did care deeply about social status and warrior masculinity. For a free Saxon man, taking the dominant role in a same-sex encounter was perfectly acceptable because it asserted power, but taking the passive role was considered the ultimate disgrace. They used the concept of ergi—which meant unmanliness or effeminacy—as a severe social insult that could lead to deadly duels. While we see glimpses of cross-dressing in their rituals and myths, like priests adopting female attire to perform specific types of magic, it was confined strictly to those spiritual spaces. Outside of rituals, if a man wore women's clothing or shirked his warrior duties, society viewed him with deep suspicion and shame. So while they didn't have strict church dogmas yet, their tribal honor system strictly enforced rigid, dominant gender roles.

No they ate, rape or killed them for being gay most time that happen during Roman era mostly

>>16363756
the evidence shows the opposite

We are conveniently ignoring Roman and Greek pagans, who literally built what was once the finest city in the world at the time as well as western civilization itself, Greek philosophy was even highly influential in Muslim civilization too and the Greeks affects the art of Buddhism permanently. The heights of the Occident ultimately was Christian though, but there was a distant fondness for the aesthetics and spirit of the pagans, but ultimately most pagan religions and folk traditions are just retarded.

>>>16363756 (You)
>the evidence shows the opposite
Ummm, your talking about stuff mostly isn’t written down and most time burnt or oral taught they did most gay stuff in early church and rome era

>>16363694 (OP)
Paganist satanist during antiquity were basically savages that prob worshipped a pig or a cow. Only the abrahamist religion empire like the roman empire helped them civilized

>>16363776
The Power Dynamic (Not the Gender) Mattered: As actual Germanic and Saxon laws developed, it became completely clear that they did not penalize same-sex intimacy itself. What they severely penalized was the loss of masculinity and submission. If a free warrior took the passive, receptive role in a sexual encounter, he was branded argr or ergi (unmanly/cowardly). It wasn't "being gay" that got a man ostracized or targeted—it was the perceived surrender of his status as a dominant male warrior.

The Context of "Cowardice": In Tacitus's Latin phrase, corpore infames sits right alongside ignavos (cowards) and imbelles (shirkers/those unfit for war). In the brutal tribal reality of early Saxony, failing to fulfill your role as a warrior or abandoning your masculine duties to the tribe was essentially a capital offense against the community.

Tacitus Had a Political Agenda: Tacitus wasn't writing an objective textbook; he was writing a political critique of Rome. He frequently romanticized the Germanic tribes as "pure, harsh, and hyper-moral" specifically to shame his Roman readers, whom he viewed as soft, decadent, and corrupt.

What the Bog Bodies Actually Show: While physical "bog bodies" have been found pinned down under hurdles in Northern Germany and Denmark, carbon-dating and modern forensic science reveal a massive variety of contexts. Many were ritual or religious human sacrifices to the gods, some were prisoners of war, and others were thieves or traitors. There is zero physical evidence linking these bog burials exclusively to a purge of same-sex attraction.

>>>16363776 (You)
>The Power Dynamic (Not the Gender) Mattered: As actual Germanic and Saxon laws developed, it became completely clear that they did not penalize same-sex intimacy itself. What they severely penalized was the loss of masculinity and submission. If a free warrior took the passive, receptive role in a sexual encounter, he was branded argr or ergi (unmanly/cowardly). It wasn't "being gay" that got a man ostracized or targeted—it was the perceived surrender of his status as a dominant male warrior.
>
>The Context of "Cowardice": In Tacitus's Latin phrase, corpore infames sits right alongside ignavos (cowards) and imbelles (shirkers/those unfit for war). In the brutal tribal reality of early Saxony, failing to fulfill your role as a warrior or abandoning your masculine duties to the tribe was essentially a capital offense against the community.
>
>Tacitus Had a Political Agenda: Tacitus wasn't writing an objective textbook; he was writing a political critique of Rome. He frequently romanticized the Germanic tribes as "pure, harsh, and hyper-moral" specifically to shame his Roman readers, whom he viewed as soft, decadent, and corrupt.
>
>What the Bog Bodies Actually Show: While physical "bog bodies" have been found pinned down under hurdles in Northern Germany and Denmark, carbon-dating and modern forensic science reveal a massive variety of contexts. Many were ritual or religious human sacrifices to the gods, some were prisoners of war, and others were thieves or traitors. There is zero physical evidence linking these bog burials exclusively to a purge of same-sex attraction.

They burnt women massive droves for Odin because he hate women leading him on, however he did where dress even tho Loki did slander him for being weird in the bed room

>>16363831
Odin says trans rights

>>16363859
in iceland the pagan majority is into homosexuality and transgenderism

lmaoo

>>>16363831 (You)
>Odin says trans rights
More like trying impress women for weird cuck reason but do wonder that led him to burning tons of women

snca

>>16363906
shit pagans care about

>>16363909
soo nobody then… heh

>>16363913
kill yourself obsessed

>Did Paganism ever build europe?
>
>Same region btw
Lots of paganism is about not cucking for women and rape

>>Did Paganism ever build europe?
>>
>>Same region btw
>Lots of paganism is about not cucking for women and rape
Only thing they built was like wood houses like Amish people or hobbit holes and protected there crops and fertile land award

>>>Did Paganism ever build europe?
>>>
>>>Same region btw
>>Lots of paganism is about not cucking for women and rape
Greek, China, Scythians, and semites built the today structures actually
>Only thing they built was like wood houses like Amish people or hobbit holes and protected there crops and fertile land award