do you like it

Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:28:47 №16307813 [Quote]

do you like it

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:29:19 №16307816 [Quote]

File: 1777066364733z.mp4 📥︎ (2.96 MB, 1280x720) ImgOps

>mpa
QUOTE.

Cobbert 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:29:41 №16307818 [Quote]

File: 1779074359194r-1.mp4 📥︎ (3.24 MB, 1280x720) ImgOps

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:30:00 №16307820 [Quote]

>>16307818
itt we post media pending approvals

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:30:31 №16307825 [Quote]

>>16307820
Too late the video isnt MPA nomore

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:31:17 №16307827 [Quote]

File: 1775824650389p.mp4 📥︎ (730.42 KB, 512x640) ImgOps

>>16307813 (OP)

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:31:18 №16307828 [Quote]

What app is this

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:31:20 №16307829 [Quote]

File: 1775395542128r.gif 📥︎ (195.99 KB, 680x566) ImgOps

>>16307813 (OP)
Needs a little bit of working, otherwise a gem. Keep going to shooting stars.

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:32:07 №16307837 [Quote]

>>16307828
after effects
>>16307829
its a bit rough o algo but i cant pinpoint why

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:33:07 №16307841 [Quote]

>>16307827
media isnt pending approval doe

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:33:52 №16307844 [Quote]

>>16307837
It's rough because of the 'jaks moving in and out not being all too smooth, it's a bit too sudden and quick, try to pick a smoother movement arch or something

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:33:53 №16307845 [Quote]

not worth finishing OP your gem will be outshadowed by the 100th bait thread

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:34:28 №16307847 [Quote]

>>16307845
Demoralizer tranny detected, DNI

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:34:45 №16307852 [Quote]

File: 1775838956607j.mp4 📥︎ (2.13 MB, 300x300) ImgOps

>after effects

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:36:17 №16307861 [Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (87.19 KB, 490x496) ImgOps

>>16307847
don't say I didn't tell you blud

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:36:35 №16307862 [Quote]

gem

Chud 05/30/26 (Sat) 17:37:46 №16307868 [Quote]

>>16307844
this is actually one of the smoothest graphs ive made, i'd have to make it longer o algo
>>16307845
you may be right but ive already spent 4 hours on it sunk cost fallacy + the booru will like it
>>16307852
true