/soy/ - Soyjaks

Today janjans did not take any chances. The post had proven too much of a potential liability and had to be terminated before things could dangerously escalate.

However I am still standing, implying the post was ultimately not enough to warrant a ban. This implies that the actual rules follow a strict legalist approach of "necessary adulthood", in which once the character is of legal age it is "possible" to portray sexually explicit behaviour, regardless of sorrounding context. This is further corroborated by yesterday's test, in which ultimately arbitrary deletion by joons was the outcome. This could pose a risk, since if Janjas can delete ad hoc whatever they deem inappropriate it could lead to redundancy of the established rules and as a consequence an increase in the silencing of threads and Jans authoritarianism.

I thus urge the Quote administration to update the rules in order to make my current experiments impossible, but most importantly I urge him to guarantee the sacrality and authority of the rules to ensure a functional and fair site.

Further testing will ensue in the next days.