â„–99889[Quote]
Yes. You are not born wrong for being male. You are a wonderful male who deserves to have your natural rights of reproduction and companionship fulfilled. Under a different society you would be a treasured interesting person. You are more interesting, reflective, knowledgable, and deep than the normalfag masses that surround you. You have been programmed into thinking you are WORTHLESS. BUT YOU ARE NOT.
YOU, YOU ARE BETTER!
Under hypergamous hell 2026 men are reduced to their most superficial surface attributes. This is a direct consequence of women having rights, biologically, women are favored, more empathized with, cherished, by all of society. They had to be nerfed from this advantage for civilization to exist, but now we've removed their nerfing and they've come to dominate us.
Who decides which individuals are valued and worthless now? WOMEN DO. And the men they love are as valued as these shallow holes are.
Them getting rights has devalued YOU as a person. A woman lead society = men are reduced to their shallowest attributes which YOU (a robot) fails to meet.
Do not fall for the propaganda that you are a failure and worthless. You are judging yourself by female standards which keep men chained in a system that only benefits 20% of us. Sexual liberation NOW!
â„–99892[Quote]
im a fat brown involuntarily celibate based right winger and I thank you kindly
â„–99895[Quote]
Don’t use dating apps, don’t go on porn sites, don’t pay for OnlyFans, don’t slide into her DMs, don’t give free compliments and validation, and split the bill on the first date. Too many men simp and give away validation like it’s candy. If they just stopped they would have a lot more leverage.
â„–99903[Quote]
Beta uprising when
â„–99921[Quote]
>>99889 (OP)you eat actual fucking pizza with like kuru and shit, I’m not entitled to sex I’m a striate white man o algo
â„–99924[Quote]
Didn't read past the title but based
â„–100030[Quote]
"natural right to reproduction" is not real. if anything hypergamy is far more natural than any sort of dysgenic and/or dysfunctional retard getting to breed. you arent naturally entitled to anything but suffering
â„–100032[Quote]
>>100030i also want to mention that the second half of this post is the same shit feminists were talking about before it became mainstream. chuds mad the pendulum is swinging the other way, if you want a natural solution to your "unnatural" problem just become a rapist
â„–100136[Quote]
words are meaningless and forgetable
â„–100138[Quote]
>>99895Why even split the bill on the first date. The first date shouldn't have a bill large enough for it to matter. Go to a park or a cafe or something, and if its just 1 coffee it doesn't really matter anyway. Don't ever bring a girl to a restaurant or anything like that early on.
Theres multiple reasons to not eat out on the first date too. Cost is obviously one, but also, if she isn't feeling it, or if you aren't feeling the connection, its low-commitment to go to a cafe/park, you can make an excuse and leave. A cinema or a restaurant requires you to both sit there for an extended period of time without an easy way to escape. Getting a coffee and going on a walk is great because if theres an awkward silence you can just look around and not be facing each other waiting for the food to come.
â„–100139[Quote]
>>100032I've come to a similar conclusion as well. Basically all animals rape. I don't support it but its clearly natural, the way the low-grade males get to breed and pass on their genes is through force. In the period between ww2 and ~2000, instead of rape, low tier males used financial stability as a way to get with women. Now that women earn the same or more than men on average, they have no need for a betabuxx deluxe, and the suboptimal males become genetic dead ends.
â„–100142[Quote]
True, we are christpilled aryans here, like next level of humanity
â„–100143[Quote]
>>100139suboptimal males werent simply able to rape because gangs of optimal males would kill them if they even got close to their harem. rape still happened suboptimal males arent supposed to be able to pass on their genes, because it would poison the gene pool. i suppose also of an optimal male dies on the hunt the suboptimal male could pass on their genes as well, but in nature suboptimal males are supposed to be selected against, both environmentally and sexually. not to say any of this is good, however, a lot of things that are natural are bad. but saying men have a right to sex is just braindead
â„–100145[Quote]
>>100030>>100143
>"natural right to reproduction" is not real. if anything hypergamy is far more natural than any sort of dysgenic and/or dysfunctional retard getting to breed. you arent naturally entitled to anything but sufferingExcept women choose dysgenic tall retards just for the fact they're tall or have soft facial features. Imagine being smoothbrained enough to think what women choose = eugenic. In my opinion, if only people on soyjak.st reproduced, it would result in a much better.
Brother, unless you're in the 20% of moggers favored by women, why are you even disagreeing with us? By soyfacing about rape and womens rights to be hypergamous you're only cucking yourself lol
>>100143>suboptimal maleWhat is suboptimal in this society (bad face, bad height) would have been optimal in a farmer or hunter gatherer society. You're falling for the meme that women actually choose optimal men. I have literally observed a half-blind dysgenic chad get more women than 90% of males