â„–97598[Quote]
They would just leak and call you a pedophile o algo. Trannies do the same thing when people dont want to date them, they call people transphonos
â„–97603[Quote]
They will be angry with you regardless of what you say, so might as well tell the truth. If you are a virgin then tell them that, that it's not fair or right to have such relations with someone who won't value it as much as you. IF you are NOT a virgin, then yes you are a hypocrite but don't let that stop you it didn't stop the forefathers.
Part of the problem is that you kids live in the digital world, and the digital world is fake and used to manipulate you. IT was engineered from the ground up by the maxwells, mostly irene maxwell, to manipulate people.
I am not saying ignore everything online, but i am also telling you not to take it at face value. you need to research more.
The old redpill used to use a phrase "awalt" or "all women are like that". it was incorrect. Some women are good, but those women are rare and involve a lot of searching, and since they are rare they will have a high value. Now what made the redpill stupid, and what makes me think it was a honey pot, was those guys were obsessed with sex and NOT spirituality or relationships. Those guys are dumbfucks and i can look back with hindsight on my side and tell them smugly that i was right.
But yes, you should seek a virgin if you are one. You should seek someone who will commit to a long term relationship. You should not chase physical gratification, as that only brings pain. IF you are not a virgin then you should seek someone with a similar body count, preferably less as multiple partners destroys pair bonding. If you are not prepared for a long term relationship, then you should not be out chasing girls but making yourself stable.
â„–97627[Quote]
Its best to avoid the conversation entirely or to just tell the truth if you have to. Like 'ake the Dog says if you are a virgin its the easy explanation that makes perfect sense, and otherwise its still a matter of personal preference, what you like will still be what you like.
>>97603The redpill was definitely a honeypot. The mascot of it that brought it to the spotlight was andrew tate and the guy was revealed to be a massive fraud, renting all his cars and he was a pedo too or something. He was obviously a retard and the ideology mostly pushed mindlessly banging as many low quality chicks as you could, might as well call it STDmaxxing. Clavicular and looksmaxxing is basically the new evolution of it. The basics of looksmaxxing are valid and should be applied, like paying attention to diet and exercising to not be a fat slob and doing basic self care stuff like exfoliating sometimes. The rest only really applies for online dating and hookup culture though. People in the past nearly always met through friends, family or work, and so would have the time to develop a sort of friendship before jumping to dating. This meant that looks mattered less and the chemistry between the couple and personalities mattered a whole lot more. If you are interested in a meaningful relationship you have to put yourself into social environments like a hobby club to meet people, not the whorehouses of the internet or nightclubs
â„–97641[Quote]
>>97627I've noticed that looksmaxxers all look the same (or want to have same appearance) like soulless retarded NPCs.
>a bit long curly zoomer hair with shaved sides>polished skin and pinkish makeup>protruding cheekbones with narrow chin>fucking red lips of a jartycuckthese faggots make me geg. maybe I'll draw a looksmaxxer 'jak later