/r9k/ - ROBOT9999

Economically left Socially right. Authoritarian.

Authoritarian is the simplest part to explain. Nothing gets done by letting people do shit alone, and for any rules or morals to be upheld you need someone enforcing rules. Any greatness in history came from a centralised position of power. Caesar, Napoleon, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, literally any monarch with the title of "the great".

I'm socially right wing because why the hell would I be on this site if I was a leftist. I hate that trannies exist and want them all hanged (Does this make me an accelerationist). Fags have kinda existed since antiquity but it was better when they would be shot for being public about it. I want the turd-worlders gone because they brap everything up.

Economically left wing. I want state control over industries, kinda like the chinks have, and for the government to be protectionist. Why the hell would a state prioritise free markets over the good of their own people. Free markets were literally forcibly imposed to control countries like Qing China and the Ottoman Empire while Europe could protect their own economies. Partial state ownership of all major industries while smaller businesses are allowed to do what they want with minimal taxation. Partial state ownership incentivises efficiency since the owners of the companies still benefit from profits, and provide the state with a lot of money without having to tax individuals to death.

With all the money the state has it could fund major projects, and invest into the country. You could have the state setting contracts and getting companies to fight for them like most military industrial complexes work, the best wins. Public infrastructure and welfare could be made manageable. To combat welfare leeches you have strict checks for who gets it and who doesn't, and any leeches can be conscripted labour for construction.

>>97146
I dont follow any ideology personally, I am for military meritocracy (e.g Rome during some eras like Trajan, or Italo Balbo Libya, DPRK, Kodoha faction Military coup attempt )

Also I am for for decentralizaing everything

i dont care about politico slop. just put me in charge of everything with absolute unimpeachable powers and i would never never never never never never ever become a hedonistic and deranged despot X3

>>97146
this guy is a retard that thinks monarchy and despotism is le good beacuse of 5 or 6 """based""" and """redpilled""" heads of state he heard about on /pol/ and saw edits of on niggergram reels while ignoring that the glaring problems that make democracies retarded also infect any sort of absolute power structure even worse, that being 90% of people are amoral retards without the force of will to take power and wield it intelligently, 9% are amoral geniuses that won't wield power with the interests of the state much less the people in mind and the remaining 1% is so rare that those that DO actually want power and don't realize leading a country is a lot of heartache and hassle just get killed by the 9% wielding the 90% as a weapon (i.e. caesar). those few that do get the """"""privilege"""""" of leading their state are really good >though

btw hitler wasn't great he was a retard that blew his load too early and lost all of his territory and paved the way for german heritage and identity to be completely erased as it is now in the 21st century. also ww2 caused a retaliatory german holocaust that just got more germans killed needlessly after the fact as if the rape of berlin by ruzzians wasn't enough. if he really was great he would've expanded infinitely slower instead of trying to conquer all of europe before he had answered the jewish question like an idiot

>>97192
Hitler was a nigger

>>97193
trvke. hitler was a shabbos goy and im tired of pretending he wasn't

>>97197
This is the most masculine hitler hater

Misanthropy and hatred of all life in general. I despise conventional slave morality and I long for societal collapse.

>>97202
I don't let my misanthropy bleed into my worldview. My personal issues with people don't reflect on the nature of people overall. I think that even if I despise the people around me, I should still resolve to act on the greater good.
I think a total societal collapse is not the way to go about it. Just like the bolsheviks, Jews could swoop up a collapsing society from under and take control of it with an even firmer fist than they had before. If there is to be a revolution it will need to know its enemy and strike its throat.

>>97146 mi

>>97192
Hitler was a retard definitely but he was still a "great" person. He still took over basically all of europe.

I want a more authoritarian stance on government but not a monarchy, I'm not that retarded. The first king might be great and then the second is a complete brainlet that is only there because of his blood. You can have an authoritarian figure with a whole lot of strength placed more in the bureaucratic system and plenty of checks for power. My main reason for wanting an authoritarian system instead of a democracy is from what I've observed with the democratic system.

Promising realistic changes gets you nowhere. You have to lie out of your arse, because you having power depends entirely on convincing the most retarded niggers out there that you are better than the other candidate, when those retarded niggers won't even read your proposed policy and depend entirely on information from the press and social media.

Then once someone is elected, they have an incredibly short term time. No matter what, you can blame all problems, including those you cause, on the previous opposing party in charge, and the goyim just nod and agree. There is no point in making long term investments, because if they are longer than 4 years or however long the term time is, if the opposing party gets voted in they will rape it and make their own similar project to take the credit. Also, people only care about what has happened recently for elections, not what could happen in 10 or 20 years time that was set up.

Some of these problems could be sorted out by having longer term times, maybe 10 years. Forces the ruling party to take some responsibility and allows for more long term projects.

I don't watch based and redpilled nigger edits, and I definitely don't base my ideology on that. I have been trying to tell people that hitler was a retard for ww2 and demolished the old order of the west by bringing down the old colonial powers, letting the only two powers be the communists and the jewish states of america. The Suez Crisis, the colonial wars in Indochina, Algeria and Rhodesia, these are all cases that would have not been possible if France and Britain were not weakened.

If Hitler wasn't a retarded nigger he wouldn't have been itching for a war and would have stopped when the Poles refused to let him have Danzig. Germany would have been the most powerful country in Europe, and if they hadn't signed the pact they could have prevented Soviet expansion. The jews weren't popular in a single place in Europe at the time, even the most liberal countries like France still had strong antisemitic presence and only really the USA liked them. They would have been given their shithole in Palestine and nobody would have listened to them whining all day about "its anotha shoah!", they would be ignored in the west and too busy fighting sandniggers.

>>97201
Define masculinuty

>>97216
sure, he raped a lot of europe but at what cost to his state? his people? the reason friederich is remembered as 'the great' to this day is because he was able expand and enhance prussia WITHOUT GETTING IT RAPED LITERALLY TO DEATH AND SET UP HIS PEOPLE FOR AN ENTIRE CENTURY OF HUMILIATION. how could hitler possibly be great if he didnt accomplish anything but ending anti-semitism in the west, the complete OPPOSITE of one of his stated goals?

and what is the point of an authoritarian leader if most his power is placed in the government? and who chooses the next leader after the first one bites it? the government itself? a small cabal of oligarchs? and who picks the seats in that government anyhow, it that democratic or is the autocrat allowed to stack the deck, completely neutering any chance the checks and balances had of stopping tyranny? surely with an supreme leader you get real change, but how much of that change is good? how long before dear leader goes mad from power and the entire country is set back decades because we all agreed that this one retard gets power for the rest of his life no matter what? does he get couped by nobles and replaced with someone that cares more about the epstein class than the working class? at least with a democratic system the leader as some reason to be vaguely familiar with the wants and needs of his people, but with an authoritarian he's gonna be spending so long up in his ivory tower he will likely just forget what the people want or stop fucking caring.

also, the government is not the people. having a ruler be beholden to government wants is absolutely not the same as a ruler being beholden to his people. just take one look throughout history and see how often a good ruler has to fight tooth and nail just to get around the bureaucratic clusterfuck of his government just to make real change happen. one man with a grudge or an complex in the wrong place can completely FUCK everything up. the elimination of democracy does not stop parties from spawning either. just give it some time, and before long there are going to be factions vying for power and fucking over people they dont like wasting valuable government time and tax money under the nose of the big man in charge, official or unofficial it doesnt matter. it is human nature to form tribes, and thats what humans are going to do.

all this doesnt even approach the subject of the rarity of finding a compitent and moral leader. i suppose a state could get by by having a long string of 'meh' rulers that dont do anything too bad while having a gigachad in office every so often, but all it takes is one corrupt sociopath to flush most of that progress down the toilet, or in the case of hitler, RAPE the country and its people TO DEATH because of unchecked ambition. and who among is is most likely to seek power? i sure as hell know it isn't the people that deserve it and are able to withstand it's corrupting influence.

and napoleon, remember him? the same autist that crowned him self emperor just to start a war with all of europe because he couldn't keep his dick in his pants, killing millions of frenchmen for an ambition that DIED before he did? what a great guy that napoleon, took power from a corrupt government, crowned himself emperor, and got BTFO'D after a few years of making europe his bitch. just for the old monarchy to get reinstated with less power. what did he do for france, other than making it a military superpower for a short time in history and making the rest of europe leak their clitty? fucking NOTHING. the best part about his reign was that it ended and louis xviii was reinstated and the people of france finally got a break from being milked dry by the ambition of crazed retards.

>>97289
me
>gigariginal

>>97292
Hitler le bad

>>97143 (OP)
idk like clitty-adjacent neo-whitepowerism or however the ideologies are brapped

>>97312
Coal check…

>>97143 (OP)
God you r9khomos are all just so worthless

national-fascism

>>97289
not being a feminine homosexual like you

>>97324
Saging to give yourself an attention

>>97326
Who said I cant be feminine outside and masculine inside?

>>97325
What that even mean

>>97330
Generic military dictatorslop ideology #90001

>>97331
Fascism is when evil racist capitalism

>>97332
who are you responding to? me or the strawman?

>>97334
Is this ragebait?

>>97337
what do you think? who said anything about racism or capitalism? you need to get off of /pol/ little buddy. come join the rest of us in the real world, ok?

>>97339
Its a joke, stop being inmature

>>97348
sorry im used to talking to people mindbroken by politics i thought you were being serious. take this rare soy as recompense

>>97349
I dont care what you tal anyway, no need your apologies or words

>>97350
I think I know you from the 'tube

>>97447
Huh?? What you mean