>>92878>>r**dit basedboy cucks being unwittingly betabuxxed and settled for by some bitch with a "sexy phase" in post-secondary education - oh but it's okay because she loves me now!!! shes totally over uhh chad that's why we only have sex once a week!I won't deny that's "incel" babble. Still, nothing I said is implausible. It stands to reason the men with the lowest standards or self respect are least likely to voice their criticisms or concerns.
Additionally, you shouldn't accuse everyone you dislike of being an incel. It makes you sound like a foid.
>"hurr durr have sex incel" (because sex is the only form of value I understand)I am also speaking from experience, which is precisely in line with how it works (if you bothered to read).
>>92875Something I forgot to add. Men complaining about "foids being le evil" is nothing new. Of the most common joke gags of 1900s shows was men discussing their dissatisfactions of women.
"My wife has been nagging me again"
"Only for the 99th time this week!"
*Cue laughter track*
Show jokes of something similar were certainly not popular or funny if they weren't relatable or reasonable.
From the king, philosopher, inventor, to the farmer, manual laborer, etc - have all voiced disdain for women for since language and institutionalized courtship were established.
What you are noticing as "incels (aesthetic)" is due to increased avenues and diversity of self-expression; mostly the internet. These people have simply been given a podium to stand on, and the world willing as an audience. They are freer to engage in and express their gripes with women more than ever, and what would you know?— they do exactly that, no surprises.