>>88378 (OP)It's a form of mutilation. It's somewhat justified only if you have harmful phimosis, yet you can surgically widen the foreskin instead of cutting it off.
When I was 7 y.o. some foid during medical check said that it's bad that I can't open my penis and I should get circumcised. After they explained me what it is like I thought "fuck that, I won't agree to do this". My mother agreed with me and we said that we'll stretch it by hand, but after some unsuccessful attempts we forgot about it (and that foid forgot about me too).
I found out that foreskin is attached to glans by some tissues which disappear by themselves at 8-12 years. I remember that I could freely open mine at ~13 y.o. There can be no phimosis before pubescence, it's natural. That's why circumcision should be banned for children.
Thank God we didn't listen to that braindead jewish foid. I don't have any phimosis, I also can leave glans covered even when erect, it's really comfortable and I don't feel any pain/discomfort.
Actually by circumcision in bible they meant cutting off the umbilical cord. And old testament was written AFTER new testament.