/qa/ - Question & Answer

I wonder what the implications age of the corpse would have in this scenario
Would it even matter? If you perfectly preserved a corpse and resurrected it after 1000 years, maybe it would be considered a delicacy since it's hard to come by.

My fucking trip failed FUCK

I think the moral implications of resurrecting a dead person to get consent to fuck them are more profound than ordinary necrophilia
I didn't consider the idea that maybe necrophiliacs would prefer this, I assumed that maybe the lifelessness adds to the attraction.
I don't know how these people think clearly

Maybe, necrophiles don't actually like the dead part of the corpse they want to fuck. Maybe it's discretionary.
From what I know about fetishes, they are tied to the disgust/grotesque part of whatever the obsession is; so the rotting / decaying part of the corpse will be attractive.
I'm assuming, then, that smell would factor into the attraction. Maybe they wouldn't want this thing to be alive after all because then the disgust part diminishes.
I'm unsure if I'd be as grossed out by a zombie as I would an actual rotting human corpse, because it's still somewhat alive, right?
I'm sure, in this hypothetical situation, that fucking a resurrected zombie would be an initiation into some kind of cult

If you cannot get the zombie pregnant, then it is just a form of faggotry, thus is punishable by death.

>>1039534
Nice blanket ban on masturbation nusoi
But I was talking more about moral implications