â„–4191035[Quote]
Pussy
â„–4191042[Quote]
>>4191035It's mid, honestly. Had more fun with a mans asshole personally.
>>4191036You're coping since you have a micropenis. The average lenght of a white mans dick is at least 6 inches. The only reason the global average is 5 is because asians pull it all the way down
â„–4191043[Quote]
the sun is hot
â„–4191045[Quote]
>>4191043No, no it isn't. It's scorching actually. Think before you speak moron
â„–4191046[Quote]
Cats are better than dogs and youre a faggot
â„–4191051[Quote]
>>4191046Both animals are for sissied but cats are for retarded introverted cuckolds with toxoplasmosis
â„–4191055[Quote]
>>4191030 (OP)Pedophilia is bad
â„–4191062[Quote]
>>4191046Incorrect. The only reason you'd get a cat is because you have the testicular inferiority to actually put in the effort and take care of a pet. A dog, emotionally wise, will always give you a smile and jump in excitement at your mere presence. It will not hesitate to jump in head first into a collison to save you and your loved ones. Cats? They don't do those things. Cats only lie around and snuggle like you're they're bitch. The cat will decide what THEY want.
â„–4191066[Quote]
>>4191055Why is this supposed to be a debate??
â„–4191068[Quote]
>>4191049I'm not sure I follow
â„–4191074[Quote]
>>4191030 (OP)Women are attractive
â„–4191077[Quote]
i bet i can get you not to
â„–4191079[Quote]
>>4191058The mere gaul for you to call two very different meanings of words "interchangeable" not only showcases your idiocy when it comes to anything tangible related to an alphabet, but you're also extremely deluded in whatever coping mechanism you feel like pulling out your ass to sound correct. Do better.
â„–4191087[Quote]
>>4191079Schoring is just a fancy snca way to say something is hot
â„–4191093[Quote]
>>4191079kys obsessed faggot
â„–4191095[Quote]
>>4191085This isnt a oija
â„–4191098[Quote]
>>4191084I win, my nose is thumbed at you
â„–4191101[Quote]
>>4191087No it isn't you dull minded poster. By expressing something as "hot" it leaves a vague context of what "hot" actually is. It could be tea hot, or smoking hot, but using a proper syntax in measuring an object based on their degree by using something like "scorching" leaves a lot less room for interpretation giving a clear idea of what you actually mean.
>integrity bullshit â„–4191105[Quote]
>>4191101infested with niggeraids kys obsessed jeet
â„–4191108[Quote]
>>4191105immediately jumping at pety responses of insulting someone only trying to have discussions leaves you in the eyes of people as a brain dented child with no sense of time or reason
by definition, you're retarded
â„–4191109[Quote]
>>4191101If I say the sun is hot its not very ambiguous to how hot it is
â„–4191116[Quote]
>>4191108you're infested with niggeraids you wetback
â„–4191120[Quote]
Can we debate on vc
â„–4191123[Quote]
Formatting fail kms
â„–4191124[Quote]
>>4191109It actually is. If I were to say instead "Water is cold", I am appropriating an adjective with no proper rationale as to WHY it's cold. Is it cold because it comes from the tap? Is it cold because I'm talking about the water from alaska? Is it cold because I forgot to heat it?
The same rule can be applied to your statement. It's idiotic and dumb in the sense that you're leaving too much room for interpretation. Is the sun hot because you walked outside and it's scorching you inside out? Or is the surface of the sun hot?
â„–4191134[Quote]
The sky's blue
â„–4191136[Quote]
>>4191124The sun refers to the sun in space i said the sun was hot not that it was a hot day
â„–4191141[Quote]
>>4191136Come back to me when you've learned first grade english comprehension and ability to form a sentence without having bright lights flash in your brain to try and distract you
â„–4191142[Quote]
>>4191030 (OP)Debate against this: You're capable of debating.
â„–4191143[Quote]
>>4191134The sky is white because the weather is overcast and shitty
â„–4191144[Quote]
>>4191141I win and you lost
â„–4191147[Quote]
>>4191066You didn't wreck me. pwned
â„–4191148[Quote]
>>4191030 (OP)okay. sonic 2 is actually better than sonic 3. the level design is tighter, the game is faster, and it doesn't have any exploration bullshit added onto it.
â„–4191150[Quote]
>>4191142No not really. I suck at it
â„–4191151[Quote]
>>4191150Then I win the debate
â„–4191152[Quote]
>>4191148this was the worst one so far
â„–4191154[Quote]
>>4191147>No responseI won
â„–4191155[Quote]
>>4191152where the fuck is the dbz character, youre slipping dude
â„–4191163[Quote]
>>4191157why are you self inserting as the soy boy crying? are you a soy boy crying? leave that to the other people in the thread. you're taking their jobs.
â„–4191166[Quote]
>>4191151You didn't win jack shit. Take your fingers out of your ass and stop rubbing them against your lips while you write. I merely answered your question per say. Whatever floride water you're drinking, it's affecting your testosterone levels too
â„–4191171[Quote]
>>4191166You were debating against the claim that you are capable of debating, so you admitted you're not capable of debating, hence I win by default since you admitted yourself you're not capable of debating. Keep taking LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ i win all debates son
â„–4191178[Quote]
>>4191177the fucking aura i feel when gokuposter actually posts dbz
â„–4191180[Quote]
>>4191178its resonating from my screen dude
â„–4191181[Quote]
>>4191171I want you to put on whatever glasses you wear because you're struggling. I merely gave you a response to my capabilities of debating being sub-optimal but not once did I admit to not being able to debate AT ALL. Your pre-conceived notion of jumping to conclusions based on NO evidence whatsover is quite frankly retarded.
â„–4191187[Quote]
>>4191181Pedophilia is bad. Debate me
â„–4191193[Quote]
>>4191187It is bad and shouldn't be anything but bad.
â„–4191196[Quote]
>>4191193>Debate me. Anything>ConcedesI won
â„–4191198[Quote]
>>4191196how did i concede?
â„–4191199[Quote]
>>4191198You said that my claim is right
â„–4191202[Quote]
>>4191181>not once did I admit to not being able to debate AT ALLEven doe the claim that you willingly debated against was "You're CAPABLE of debating", as in you hold the ability to have ANY debate, not "You're GOOD/SKILLFUL at debating". Your response to me claiming you're capable of holding a debate was:
>No not reallyTherefore you concede that you are incapable of holding any debate, so I win. I WIN ALL DEBATES KEEP TAKING LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
â„–4191208[Quote]
>>4191199I did, but also threw in one of my own beliefs of it in it as well. That's not forfeiting, that's adding on.
â„–4191212[Quote]
>>4191208You have to argue for a position which is wrong
â„–4191214[Quote]
>>4191212Says who? The laws of the universe. Whos forcing me to take the side of the bad thing?
â„–4191215[Quote]
>>4191211Whenever you post i get very angry and I start screaming and my mother has to calm me down
â„–4191216[Quote]
Aggron is a hotter pokemon than Delcatty
â„–4191217[Quote]
>>4191216Fuck it we just posting this on flag
â„–4191218[Quote]
>>4191214>Debate me. Anything.Not just positions which you disagree with
â„–4191219[Quote]
ofn id fuck the shit out of aggron
â„–4191225[Quote]
>>4191202By reiterating the point "AT ALL" implies my inability to debate in the slightest, to which is false because I would've just said "No" but by adding on "not really" implies some sort of capability / skill in that regard.
â„–4191228[Quote]
>>4191218Do you make the fucking rules or something? What is this? Stick blasting each other with imaginary guns and saying "I hit you first!" so you have to follow my rules? Hold your horses young man but it doesn't work that way.
â„–4191230[Quote]
Debate me this
Tuna live in ocean
â„–4191231[Quote]
>>4191229Daughter* 💅💅💅💅💅💅💋
â„–4191235[Quote]
>>4191228What do you think 'anything' means?
â„–4191237[Quote]
>>4191235Stick to the topic.
â„–4191238[Quote]
>>4191232It's better than being shaped like a cat
â„–4191240[Quote]
>>4191237This is relevant to our argument
â„–4191241[Quote]
Debate me on this
Earth has trees
â„–4191245[Quote]
>>4191225Well the original claim was that you are capable of debating, so if you're claiming that you are debating against a claim then you cannot agree with the primary premise of the claim. If the primary premise is that you have any capability of debating, then you did not debate against this by providing an answer that agrees with this premise since it implies some ability to debate, which is in agreement with the claim. Therefore, the only proper interpretation for it to be considered disagreeing, and therefore a debate, is if you simply meant you can't debate at all.
â„–4191247[Quote]
Debate me this
Chicken egg has chicken inside egg if fertalised
â„–4191249[Quote]
Debate me this
Scotland have grass
â„–4191250[Quote]
>>4191242>Do you make the fucking rules or something? What is this?>Debate me. Anything.Trying to determine what the terms of your original question is
â„–4191252[Quote]
>>4191238idk cats are some of the most successful hunters ever
â„–4191253[Quote]
Debate me dogs have paws
â„–4191254[Quote]
Debat
Bats have bodies
â„–4191255[Quote]
>>4191252We're talking about sex appeal, dude
â„–4191261[Quote]
Debate
It hirt why eyes when I look at each sun when no sun galsses
â„–4191263[Quote]
Debate cow make cow milk
â„–4191264[Quote]
>>4191255apparently we're talking about 2 different things
â„–4191265[Quote]
Notice how they cant debate me?
â„–4191269[Quote]
>>4191262thats not how that works
â„–4191271[Quote]
>>4191245The original claim was correct, debating the fact of if I can debate. You were asking me to debate the fact that if I can debate, to which I said "no not really" implying a lack of skill in that regard. By very definition, I am debating my capability of debating as a response to your debate. No one "won" this debate as no part has conceived of the debate in the first place. I merely debated your statement of me being capable of debating.
â„–4191276[Quote]
>>4191250The terms to the contract was "anything" not "anything i want op to be debate and take the side on"
â„–4191282[Quote]
>>4191276It includes the latter
â„–4191292[Quote]
>>4191285It is part of 'anything' because it is conceivable
â„–4191299[Quote]
>>4191287Please stop posting your wife is with Tyrone !! Right now!
â„–4191300[Quote]
>>4191030 (OP)Poop is better than pee :P
â„–4191301[Quote]
>>4191292True, I guess your statement of anything can be interpret as literally anything in a vacuum, however no one said anything about having having to take the side of ANYTHING
â„–4191304[Quote]
>>4191271The claim was not challenging your skill at debating, but simply if you're capable of debating or not. If you want to debate against this claim, then you'd have to disagree and claim you're not capable of debating, as otherwise any other response that isn't a binary 'no' is agreeing with my claim since the main premise of my claim is that you are capable, and therefore able to hold any debate. That means this is not a proper debate. but you claimed you would debate anything so you are now breaking the rules you've established.
â„–4191306[Quote]
>>4191301How else can you debate anything?
â„–4191320[Quote]
scared???
â„–4191334[Quote]
>>4191304You are so beautifully majestic it leaves me with describable words to your mere memory.
The claim itself is challenging my ability to debate because by saying "You're capable" tells in writing one's capability of a skill. I debated your statement of being "capable" in the first place by refuting it with a "no not really" which quite literally starts and continues the debate. Not that anybody won.
YOU have stated that I am capable of debating, to which I responded in a less than ideal manner as to my lack of ability to do so.
However you're forgetting one thing. I was a different person than I were 10 minutes ago. I may have not been able to debate then, but I am now. You are debating about a past version of me being unable to debate, however my current version can debate. Because I answered your debate with "no not really" and a second later I am capable, you have officially lost the argument
â„–4191344[Quote]
>>4191306Because "anything" in this manner is subjective to ones idea of what "anything" is.
â„–4191352[Quote]
>>4191336Why goku showing his ass? Is he a homosexual?
â„–4191363[Quote]
>>4191334While you may be capable of debating now in contrast to yourself 15 minutes ago, I have won the debate since at the time, it's implied that by claiming that you capable of debating that I mean you are capable of debating at this current time due to the present tense of that sentence with the word 'are' rather than 'will' or 'was' for future and past respectively. Therefore, if you admit that you were admitting that you, at that time, were fully incapable of debating by disagreeing with my claim that you are capable of debating, then I win the debate because, by default, you can't debate that further if you are not capable of debating.
â„–4191373[Quote]
>>4191344"Anything" clearly refer to something which can possibly be the case. Defending a position which you don't agree with is possible
â„–4191395[Quote]
File: Oekaki.png 📥︎ (252.98 KB, 480x480) 7224704c4d9966b35b39292b666992d90d9e6796fb244976a6563945d8a3e6b90ImgOps
.
â„–4191397[Quote]
>>4191393>>4191395mpa niggerhell jannies kys
â„–4191401[Quote]
>>4191397maybe they hate rabbits…
â„–4191411[Quote]
>>4191406janjans are cunts
â„–4191416[Quote]
>>4191411theyre too busy gooning
â„–4191439[Quote]
>>4191437Irrefutable take you mean