>>4018880My interpretation may have flaws, but I have a good reason to believe that it is majorly correct one, since I interpret it usually quite literally, and bible said many things quite, well,
literally.
<Bible wasn't 100% racist, and neither were "Le heccerino basederino poperino" I mentioned, true. And it's okay, we shouldn't have everybaldi because they were born with the wrong skin colour, but we should treat people based on their actions and merit . Lets talk about those bible verses you gave me.
>Genesis 1:26-27Talks about how he created adam and eve (first humans) in his likeness, that's it
>Genesis 5:1-2Again, bible says that he created humans in his likeness, plus also BTFOs trannies.
>Acts 17:26Reminder of that all humans are biologically humans, plus it said "NATIONS" (note the S, meaning MANY nations), what's wrong with it?
>Romans 2:9-11Called for us to be charitable to good people if they are le good and expect punishment if we are le bad. Is there something wrong with that? Does it call for a bazillion rapist niggers to be imported from sudan? No.
>Romans 3:29-30Shows that le joos are not le God's people and gives us redeeming grace based on merit and not race. What's bad about that?
>Galatians 3:26-29Again, denies the jews their status, and paired with the fact that salvation is based on merit, is it really wrong? Do bad thing, get punished, do good thing - get rewarded.
It often gets taken out of context by liberals to claim that there are no such thing as nation, but it doesn't mention nations, it mentions that JEWS aren't the only ones who are saved.
>Matthew 5:38-48,Luke 6:27-36
Was spoken in regards to personal matters, Jesus actually once advocated for executing people who do really bad things (like leading children away from faith), plus bible often spoke things that he didn't deny, like that the duty of kings (leaders of nations and enforcers of law) is to, well, enforce law and prevent nigger rapist murderer pedophiles from roaming unpunished. There is also nothing wrong with loving the enemy, it doesn't mean that you should be a rug, but it means that if the enemy is exhausted and actually repentant, then you should help him with love.
>Matthew 26:52Often taken by liberals out of context.
Here Jesus scolded peter for cutting some guy's ear when he was being arrested and lead to being crucified.
Jesus knew it, and he told peter (the apostle) to not be overly violent, especially in such an unnecesarry case.
<Topic of popes is also a subject of debates, you spoke about them:
>>but da raycist popes! please ignore all the rest of the popes who spoke against racism and violence, only talk about da racist popes broNotice double arrows, you didn't say this, I just double quoted it.
<Fair point, though, I'd say that it's still correlated and should be carefully noted, for contraception is a big sin in Christianity and naturally if Christianity is again a thing that decreases the birth rates, is it really to blame for the fall of our demographics?
<I have read it, that's why I mentioned it.
<Thank you for the solar/lunar explanation doe.