â„–3818912[Quote]
>>3818908 (OP)He argues that,
"Consent is only needed once (at the time of nikah), and then it's binding for the remainder of the marriage (ijma')."
â„–3818913[Quote]
kazakhblud this is your mindset
â„–3818917[Quote]
He has gone a step further and suggests, though doesn't make a ruling on the fiqh that
"While we're on this topic, since the Maliki and Shafi'i schools permit a virgin girl's wali to marry her off without her consent, if she's in a coma, can he still contract her nikah?"
â„–3818929[Quote]
>>3818911Do you agree with him, Kazakh?
â„–3818934[Quote]
>>3818932Do you believe marital 'ape is real?
â„–3818935[Quote]
>>3818932I think you're way better than a lot.
â„–3818960[Quote]
unblock me sheikh i need your insight nigga
â„–3818961[Quote]
>>3818956The Salafis disagree since the ayah often shows that it is consent for all time.
â„–3818965[Quote]
>>3818961What do the Shias have to say about this?
â„–3818967[Quote]
>>3818965I am not educated on Shia Fiqh on the question