â„–3815791[Quote]
Suburbs aren't rural
â„–3815792[Quote]
>>3815789 (OP)I love both
â„–3815796[Quote]
>>3815789 (OP)nophono glazes suburbs
â„–3815797[Quote]
Id personally say living near or on the farther outskirts of a city is best
â„–3815798[Quote]
>>3815791Yes I know, but I'm saying most of the people on the right who larp being rural are just driving their ram 3500 pickups to the local suburban strip mall
â„–3815799[Quote]
>>3815798I only like either cities or wilderness, no inbetween tbh.
â„–3815801[Quote]
I grew up on a farm and I admire the Amish so I hate the city
â„–3815802[Quote]
>>3815796But why then do so many chuds love to shit on "urbanites" and "city slickers" and agree with guys like Ted Kaczynski? Realistically they all live in suburbs, cause by definition basically almost nobody lives in rural areas
â„–3815804[Quote]
>>3815802cuz theyre larpers
â„–3815805[Quote]
>>3815799Shit giggers say
â„–3815806[Quote]
>>3815804yeah I guess. Im just chimping out bc I wish there were more chuds in the city
â„–3815809[Quote]
Rural =/= suburb
â„–3815811[Quote]
>>3815806City = bad degenerate
i dont want more chuds in it suffering
â„–3815815[Quote]
>>3815811Yeah but either way you are gonna be suffering. The only hope chuds have of
changing the system is by becoming important people, all of whom live in cities
â„–3815829[Quote]
>>3815815the city is no place for a militia
â„–3815831[Quote]
>>3815829We gotta go into the woods and engage in protracted people's war to save the white race or whatever nazi-maoist bluds say.
â„–3815838[Quote]
>>3815831That's giga though.
splinter into hundreds of armed guerilla cells in the country side, impossible to defeat
asynchronous decentralized warfare
â„–3815842[Quote]
>>3815838Militias are a total larp and I say this as someone who supports 2A. Modern warfare is heavily mechanized and requires intel, IFVs, missiles, artillery, explosives, comms drones. Militias (who are way less armed and equipped than the terrorists USA has been fighting in the middle east) will get raped by the feds
â„–3815843[Quote]
>>3815838Is this what James Mason advocated for before braniggers twisted his ideas into a shitty excuse for committing 2 casualty school shootings?
â„–3815848[Quote]
>>3815842Doesn't understand people's war award
â„–3815850[Quote]
>>3815830>CheaperTrue, no argument. Although I think the improvement in quality of life (higher salary, shorter commute, better heckin food/entertainment/bars) is worth it.
>SaferJust don't live in the hood or barrio. If you can only afford hood then suburb is better, but most cities are pretty segregated in practice despite what libtards preach.
>FulfillingWay more soul crushing than a city. Ugly "architecture" (if you can even call it that), car centric city planning, nothing to do, fat old boomgroids everywhere
â„–3815857[Quote]
>>3815848Please
explain to me how a militia with no anti vehicle capabilities plans to resist a mechanized occupying force with satellite and thermal imaging. They're just gonna end up like some poor guy in a ukraine webm
â„–3815862[Quote]
>>3815857IEDs, you didn't see it in Iraq? Hit and run tactics. Also deep forests prevent mechanized forces from advancing, it pretty much forces you into CQC which is much more risky. An ambush will be deadly no matter how trained or equipped you are.
â„–3815870[Quote]
>>3815862I don't think the parallel is so obvious. The middle east is overflowing with already made high explosives that can be repurposed into effective IEDs, whereas in USA even a simple hand grenade is hard to come by, let alone an ATGM or shaped charge or something. Anyone who tries manufacturing explosives at home is gonna get their precursor chemical purchases tracked by palantir AI and get insta vanned. IMO politics (in the broad sense, not just vote harder) is more useful than paramilitary larp
â„–3815876[Quote]
>>3815842it is quixotic to think that it can be done entirely with small arms i agree. however, small arms can be used to steal larger arms, and explosives exist
u are acting as if the military is some god-like force
>>3815843idk im not a siege kind of guy
>>3815870their entire construct relies on people thinking its too hard. thinking its too complicated.
â„–3815877[Quote]
>>3815789 (OP)(1) living rurally preserves traditional avenues of meaning which have been lost in modernity, (2) mass urbanization has lead to the collapse of traditional values which were built for agricultural societies, (3) you can live a more free and independant life rurally while citycucks have very little control over their lives
â„–3815878[Quote]
>>3815862THE GULAG ARCHIPELAGO PREDICTED THIS.
â„–3815880[Quote]
>>3815870>>3815876Don't forget that
violence is offputting to many normal people, whose support is needed at least temporarily to install the new ruling class, whether they come into office politically or through
other means. Considering all factors I think
(((politics))) is the move, or at minimum should get more focus than it does now on the real right
â„–3815884[Quote]
>>3815870Making explosives and other toxic chemicals isn't as difficult as one might think. Though can't elaborate for obvious reasons.
Also cells will never engage when in a disadvantaged position, preferring to hide and blend in with locals and forcing as much collateral damage. That way recruitment rates go up. The enemy gets bogged down chasing cells and clearing areas.
â„–3815888[Quote]
If the people knew their fate, and knew how weak those who rule above them truly are, there would be the greatest uprising in history.
For if the people knew that they are in fact greater than their masters……
>>3815880the eternal war-like beast of man lies ready to pounce in the soul of man. Man will awaken to violence eventually. OSWALD SPENGLER SPOKE OF THIS. War is the oldest language, and blood alone is enough to turn the wheels of history.
chuds have been long since barred from politics doe
â„–3815889[Quote]
>>3815877Can you expand on the first two points? What values and avenues of meaning do you think have been lost in modernity?
I'm not a libertarian or anarchist, so the third point doesn't mean that much to me tbh. I'd rather be a regimented part of a bigger enterprise that I care about (civilization) as opposed to a truly independent atom in the aether of nature. But different strokes for different folks I guess, so if you really prefer that freedom then good for you. I'm not some maoist retard who wants to eliminate all rural areas
â„–3815893[Quote]
>>3815884It's only effective when your opponent at least tries to appear moral
Chechens did try this tactic but they failed the 2nd time since Russia wasn't afraid of just razing Grozny
â„–3815895[Quote]
>>3815893The scale and terrain is not comparable. I am talking in an american context.
â„–3815897[Quote]
>>3815893brutality breeds resentment. An occupation cannot last like that
they make a desert and call it peace…..
â„–3815898[Quote]
>>3815888Nah I think the "chuds are barred from politics" shit is kind of a cope. Kevin DeAnna (eceleb) has some good takes on this, but at least in muttmerica the GOP is not a strict organization at the low level. Even if chuds cannot win national office, you will still have a great impact (maybe even more than the president can nowadays, given the national gridlock) by running for mayor or sherrif or board of education or whatever
â„–3815901[Quote]
>>3815898>running for mayor or sherrif or board of educationMassie talked about this.
â„–3815904[Quote]
>>3815884Yeah, not trying to bait you into dropping
fed recipes or something. I'm just tired of the average overweight 45 year old black rifle coffee company 2A larper who thinks hes gonna take on da fedz with his PSA AR-15 that he fires only within 25m at the local indoor range. Fundamentally these people strike me as posers.
â„–3815906[Quote]
>>3815904I understand, it's a shame Americans are so docile.
â„–3815907[Quote]
>>3815880Yeah the main issue with guerrilla warfare is that it relies widely on numbers, and the amerikan rw very much lacks the amount of able-bodied combat aged men required to endure the casualties of irregular warfare
â„–3815909[Quote]
>>3815889In the past most people's lives revolved around struggling to survive (and procreate obviously) by growing your own food along with your community. Meaning was derived from toiling in fields for hours so that you wouldn't die and could pass on your seed. Agricultural moral systems like Abrahamic religions were based on making sure that everyone could survive in this rough environment so that they could procreate, which all organisms desire. These systems have become unnecessary in the modern world, leading to a rise in degeneracy
>I'd rather be a regimented part of a bigger enterprise that I care about (civilization) as opposed to a truly independent atom in the aether of natureAnd this is done better by being a slave who depends on systems completely out of his control?
â„–3815913[Quote]
>>3815907america is snca doe
â„–3815915[Quote]
>>3815909I don't think we can put the toothpaste in the tube regarding industrial agriculture. The reality is that it's really easy to grow food now with nitrogen-based fertilizers and weather prediction and whatnot. I don't see how leaving cities will change this lack of existential struggle in most people's lives, unless we go full luddite/anprim and intentionally eschew modern technology.
>being a slave who depends on systems completely out of his controlObviously my goal is not to be a slave, and I think most people also don't want to be slaves either. But I would rather be a scientific researcher or artist or philosopher than a subsistence farmer (who is still a slave, just to nature)
â„–3815922[Quote]
>>3815913Do you have your personal army of chuddies willing to die for the cause down there in australia
â„–3815925[Quote]
>>3815922It's called soyjak.st/pol
â„–3815933[Quote]
>>3815915>full luddite/anprim and intentionally eschew modern technology.I think that is what would be necessary
>But I would rather be a scientific researcher or artist or philosopherA lot of people live rural, farm a bit, and do those things
>who is still a slave, just to natureNot reliant on people at least
<But I do wonder whether it would be better to let go of the past and embrace the modern world with all of its flaws, because you are right: the old world isn't coming back
â„–3815944[Quote]
>>3815933Yeah, my personal position is to take technological progress as a given and to see what we can do within that constraint. I agree that the old world isn't coming back, but I disagree that the modern world is the best or only version of industrial society that could exist.
â„–3815949[Quote]
>>3815944I think it's ideal to live rural or in a small town while having a community, becoming financially independent, while remaining partially integrated into modern society