â„–3812151[Quote]
bro don't you have that job interview tomorrow stfu
â„–3812154[Quote]
okay cucktorio
â„–3812155[Quote]
eskimos types this thread
â„–3812157[Quote]
Yes but, can you and your muslim brothers go back to the middle east please?
â„–3812163[Quote]
mumma
â„–3812164[Quote]
>>3812154>>3812155The clock strikes midnight
â„–3812185[Quote]
>>3812157Many would go back if their country was free from western meddling, sanctions, attacks, coercion. Especially Syrians, Iranians, Palestinians, Lebanese, Etc. They don't have a positive obligation to leave, however they may voluntarily go home if it is safe and free from coercion
â„–3812188[Quote]
>>3812185Speaking of immigrants in general, why don't the Chinese or Indian immigrants leave, since the US isn't even meddling with them (well maybe a little with china). And these are on good terms.
Then are you implying that these muslim immigrants in the west are here on bad terms? If they are here on bad terms, then they do not mean well and should be expelled anyway.
â„–3812201[Quote]
>>3812188It's entirely irrelevant to the conversation, but I'm talking about some of the refugees and migrants leaving poor conditions caused by war or sanctions. Most Indian and Chinese immigrants are purely economic. Different people, different conditions. Not all Muslim immigrants would leave, but many of the refugees and escapees would go back
â„–3812212[Quote]
>>3812201You're dodging.
It is relevant because there are immigrants in the USA from india and China, with which there are few or no hostilities on the national scale. And if what you say is true about these muslims being in the west is tied directly to western meddling, then they are hostiles because they only seek a positive reason to leave.
Speaking of hostilities I still don't want foreigners coming in and taking jobs and ruining the country, but in the case of muslims who are not happy with the way USA treats them, we should not welcome them at all.
â„–3812223[Quote]
>>3812212The conversation is about hatred directed towards Palestinian reclamation ambitions simply because of ideological opposition to Islam or leftist protesters. I'm not interested in collectivist arguments about immigrants or other hypothetical nonsense. Shutting down the American war machine and Zionist Occupied regime is my interest.
â„–3812225[Quote]
>>3812223What about intervening in the strait of hormuz?
â„–3812226[Quote]
sand Aryan vvon
â„–3812233[Quote]
>>3812225Neocohen disaster. Just another operation of the Imperial war machine who's only purpose is to advance Israel's agenda and hegemony. The corruption in the US government must be obliterated. No lobbyism. Hormuz was open before the attacks
â„–3812247[Quote]
>>3812233I prefer Israel and Iran not bombing each other despite Israel having done a lot of initiating before. Also Iran doesn't need nukes. They used to be chill with saudi arabia but then they became militant and hyperreactive. A sane Iranian leader would have made peace with israel like the saudis did.
So Iran has plenty of faults too, not limited to firing on civilian transport boats.
â„–3812260[Quote]
>>3812247This is profoundly shallow and ignorant take. Israel can't merely "be made peace with". The Abraham accords is like a deal with the devil, and it's in sacrifice of the Palestinians. America doesn't have allies, it has vassals and slave states. Gulf states exist with America's permission, Iran doesn't need it
â„–3812263[Quote]
>>3812260My take is mature and examines how people treat each other at all levels of interaction and in the flow of time. My take doesn't even sacrifice any of my principles.
â„–3812264[Quote]
With America, you either sell your soul or become it's enemy. No in between. Life is too short to humiliate yourself
â„–3812269[Quote]
>>3812264What are your thoughts on trannies and open borders?
â„–3812274[Quote]
>>3812263It's an ignorant and uneducated take. It's as if I'm speaking to someone who's knowledge is limited to a few YouTube video essays and twitter posts. Your stance is weak and without nuance
â„–3812278[Quote]
>>3812269They are le bad and shit. I don't really care though, and it's entirely irrelevant
â„–3812279[Quote]
>>3812278What is bad about open borders and trannies?
â„–3812291[Quote]
>>3812279Open borders in most statist systems is guaranteed economic failure. If we eliminate any level of socialist policy, however, it can work. Trannies are gross and mentally ill. Encouraging that behavior is counterproductive to society
â„–3812298[Quote]
>>3812291Yeah muslims would actually agree with those two points. I still think dragging a conflict out instead of striking deals is almost as bad or even bad as starting one. Or worse! Depends on who does what.
â„–3812308[Quote]
>>3812298It's bad. This is why I take a stance against the American Imperial War Machine. The number 1 instigator of global conflict and destabilization
â„–3812316[Quote]
>>3812308I don't like war, but seems like most of the middle east is steady with USA except Iran. War would disrupt their daily lives.
â„–3812337[Quote]
>>3812316The middle east is and has always been a massive tangled knot of special interests, corruption, covert ops, and lies. Nothing is really as it seems. Evidence is burned like coal and gas. "Peace" with Israel is deeply unpopular among all of the people of every country in the middle east.
â„–3812339[Quote]
>>3812185None of you will leave because western nations still have the highest earnings in the world, and most muslims living in western countries are not refugees. They are economic migrants.