[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ craft ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 265005 - soybooru.com - 1sโ€ฆ.png ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (216.29 KB, 640x800) ImgOps

 โ„–3785764[Quote]

What do you think of libertarians?

Personally i'm not very fond of lolberts. Mostly their acceptance of troons, fags, and the fact they (ironically) share the same flaw with Commies being that they forget to account for selfishness.

 โ„–3785779[Quote]

Those guys want to import a gazillion blaks theu are gay estrogenized stupid open bordered reddit crying libTARDS

 โ„–3785790[Quote]

>>3785779
Das giga doe

 โ„–3785791[Quote]

I love what the wiki says about that one soybooru.com, the premium soyjak archive nametoilet

 โ„–3785800[Quote]

ive never met a racially conscious lolbert, they're always obsessed with the free market and deregulation, they believe a free market capitalistic system will not cause monopolies that would turn corporations into new governments; they think private companies are free to do whatever they want, even if they pollute the environment or hire cheap labour, as long as they dont violate "NAP", which probably doesnt work anyway, when a wealthy corporation can just destroy that anytime they want

 โ„–3785806[Quote]

>>3785790
Okay spadeson

 โ„–3785808[Quote]

>>3785800
I've been around "libertarian" circles before. And they weren't even libertarian. Closest I could get is probably National Capitalist (if that's even a real term).

 โ„–3785811[Quote]

>>3785800
they blame the state for all the problems of capitalism abd that we should abolish it, yet they dont realize that both corporations and the state benefit each other, like how cabals workk with each other; how can they be sure that it wont be the same under anarcho capitalism?

 โ„–3785887[Quote]

First off - "libertarian" and "Libertarian" are extremely different. The former is the identifier for those who believe in the political philosophy and economics of libertarianism, and the latter refers to the retarded American political party that officially rejects many of the most important libertarian beliefs, most notably the freedom of association (what the Civil Rights Act outlawed).
>>3785764 (OP)
>and the fact they (ironically) share the same flaw with Commies being that they forget to account for selfishness
This only applies to Libertarians.
>>3785800
>ive never met a racially conscious lolbert
Jeremy Kauffman, one of the heads of the denounced (and probably soon to be forcefully disbanded) LPNH, and also a major figure in the Free Stater movement, is racially concious. As is Lew Rockwell I believe. In my experience maybe half of the libertarians I've met are racially conscious. libertarians just acknowledge that race is not the most important thing, it's one of many factors.
>even if they pollute the environment
If it negatively effects anyone else or damages their property it violates the NAP. This includes the global commons like air, large bodies of water, etc. And the rest of your statement is basically the same slop circulated by people who don't know what they're talking about.
>>3785808
>I've been around "libertarian" circles before. And they weren't even libertarian.
If it was anything associated with the LP (Libertarian Party) that makes sense, because they're explicitly not libertarian. Free Staters are the most significant libertarian movement in America.
>>3785811
>they blame the state for all the problems of capitalism abd that we should abolish it
There are no problems with capitalism. Not a single "flaw with capitalism" anyone has ever brought up has been the result of free markets, it has always been the result of the state. You basically admit it a sentence later, "they dont realize that both corporations and the state benefit each other". That's absolutely true, because every known monopoly in existence has been created by the state, and if one has ever been due to free markets, it's never been recorded.
Not to mention that this is where wokeness in corporations comes from; subsidies, DEI mandates, and especially the Civil Rights Act and its resulting lawfare make nearly or possibly all corporations in America left-wing. Europe is like that but drastically worse given it's even more of a left-wing bureaucratic nightmare.

 โ„–3785893[Quote]

Rape and kill all libertarians

 โ„–3785906[Quote]

File: 1782859393284i.png ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (1 MB, 1080x857) ImgOps

>>3785764 (OP)
Hate, let me tell you how much I hate them.
You hate branoons? Wait until you encouter a 1488thrembo hour long video essay made by the same latinx libertard with a nasally faggot voice who was grown in the same lab together. And don't you dare try to argue with them before they cry about you not reading their gay little books like a communist begging you to read marx.
They are only useful as a pipeline to segway normgroids into better rightwing ideologies.

 โ„–3785911[Quote]

I forgot to touch on the topic of "cheap labor migration because of the LOLBERTS" slop. No, mass migration in America is the result of democracy, as leftists figured out that they can simply import low-IQ, low-quality human capital that will gladly vote for free gibs and their personal ethnic interests, i.e. exploiting whites for as much as they can get out of them. Before Trump's 2016 campaign, Republicans had embraced that as well and were going to fully embrace hispanic migration and trying to capture the hispanic vote. <
Not to mention that open borders is very much NOT libertarian. Murray Rothbard and Hoppe have both written extensively about this; mass migration is not just facilitated by governments, but also relies on exploiting "public property", i.e. roads, borders, housing, etc, which rightfully belong to the individuals who already occupy that area and/or paid for that property through taxes or whatever. This is only a talking point because the left-wing LP embraced this non-libertarian position.

 โ„–3785913[Quote]

>>3785887
you haven't debunked the claim that capitalism causes monopolies; if we lived in an anarcho-capitalist society, what would prevent a business to acquire vast amounts of wealth that it buys out competition and becomes almost like a state? or what would prevent businesses from creating their own cabal that benefit each other and also destroy competition? if polluting the environment is against NAP, how would that stop those corporations?

 โ„–3785920[Quote]

>>3785764 (OP)
theyre stupid fucking nigger individualistic slaves

 โ„–3785924[Quote]

File: 1782102298695k.PNG ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (177.95 KB, 1000x827) ImgOps

>>3785906
GEEEEEEEGGGGGG the pagan larp

 โ„–3785931[Quote]

>>3785913
Also faggotry and trannies. He didn't even mention that.

 โ„–3785935[Quote]

File: 1724927668815u.mp4 ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (3.01 MB, 852x480) ImgOps

>>3785924
blud thinks i care about pagays

 โ„–3785940[Quote]

>>3785911
>leftists figured out that they can simply import low-IQ, low-quality human capital that will gladly vote for free gibs and their personal ethnic interests,
you do realize that elon musk and trump are right wing, yet they advocate for H1B visas so that they could allow indians; why are you saying as if leftoids are the only problem in this? if a corporation wants to acquire short term profit, which they seem to be doing, they will import cheap labour;
i will say that i like the idea of private cities or libertarian communities, but it sounds more utopian

 โ„–3785943[Quote]

>>3785887
>the free market isn't a problem
You niggers always conveniently ignore the entire fucking history of the tobacco industry because it's a perfect counter to that retarded argument.

 โ„–3785947[Quote]

They live in a world of systematic hypocrisy. Liberty isn't true liberty when choosing what to put liberalization what fits their needs. Well, that is really both sides…

 โ„–3785949[Quote]

Libertarians are the true patriots and the true aryans. You lost btw.

 โ„–3785956[Quote]

>>3785943
Devils advocate. The free market is very good at finding the most efficent method. Problem is that the free market doesn't care what it is they only care if it makes money. This includes things such as pornography.

Also nophono is forcing you to buy cigarettes or vapes.

 โ„–3785967[Quote]

>>3785956
They sure as fuck tried, considering they were advertising to children

 โ„–3785968[Quote]

File: 1777845677891y.mp4 ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (2.63 MB, 1280x704) ImgOps

>>3785911
>>3785887
>There are no problems with capitalism.
delusional, you don't have to be a stalinpilled commie to admit this.
Corporations promote wokeness because it's profitable, even if it's to the detriment of their society as a whole since they exist to solely for the selfish reason to make profit, not make their country better. If it were legal to sell hardcore drugs, they would in a heartbeat. Sure they buy out state representatives to promote their interests like how tech jews pay retards to let them build their giant israelgpt data centers, but in a stateless land they would just pay a private army to do their bidding instead, you can't reasonably expect everyone to follow your "everybody agrees to be nice to everyone" principle.
>>3785956
>yes goy allow jewish capicucks to sell and advertise cigarettes to kids because it's based and freemarketpilled

 โ„–3785970[Quote]

>>3785913
I didn't bring up that because it's a much more complex topic and I wanted to try and aim for something readable. Before that though I want to briefly touch on this:
>and becomes almost like a state
The worst part of the "anarcho-capitalist" label is that it makes people think of "anarchy" as in no rules. Anarcho-capitalism is very much about rules, and structure, and having a functional (MORE functional) of a society than a government dependent upon involuntary relationships. We actually want private corporations to replace the state and do mostly everything the state was capable of doing. That it'd be "almost like the state" is kind of the point, it's supposed to be a superior form of government in that it's immune to drifting leftwards (which all government does and will do given the incentives of involuntary relationships and bureaucracy), more stable/rational, and eventually much more wealthy and powerful.

 โ„–3785978[Quote]

>>3785970
thats the biggest flaw i have with libertarianism
>We actually want private corporations to replace the state and do mostly everything the state was capable of doing.
so you wanna replace the state with… a corporate state? do you want a company like amazon to have its own nation, where it owns everything? or do you want multiple companies to own parts of basic living, like an oligopoly of some sorts?

 โ„–3785979[Quote]

File: 1781104880534c.png ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (627.48 KB, 1024x767) ImgOps

>becoming the richest jew ever and hiring a massive private army to rape happylibertardNAPsprinklesland and establish a national socialist MAGA Christian conservative jacobin government because what gay retard actually believes every ones going to be a good goy that follows the NAP

 โ„–3785981[Quote]

File: Dragon-Ball-Z-Perfect-Cellโ€ฆ.jpg ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (20.08 KB, 500x250) ImgOps

i think theyre a bit misguided. i totally understand the "fuck you stay off my property" uncle ted type aspects. i shouldnt need to register a firearm this is AMERICA. just because 2 dipshits, and then several more dipshits but a very small portion of the entire population (also anyone that brings it up is scared to bring up race/per capita stuff) did some crazy shit in columbine i cant buy a shotgun right off the shelf anymore? because michael moore made some gay documentary? fuck you, neeeeeeerd!

 โ„–3785982[Quote]

>>3785978
water and clean air is not a human right commie let us replace ytpipo with indians because it's based and liberty pilled

 โ„–3785983[Quote]

>>3785970
I don't want a private entity controlling my drinking water nigger

 โ„–3785991[Quote]

File: Gi7FeFpXcAE0S6C.jpg ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (82.45 KB, 777x785) ImgOps

people don't realize that these technoligical "improvements" don't make technological society easier. it creates new problems that would lead to the same technological dependency like now.

humanity is adapting itself to a mechanical universe. becoming fragmented and losing its essential nature to technological necessity. i see the rotted technological civilization. people indocrinated through the enemy's propaganda machines.

technological civilization has lost originality. it will only progress, not better itself. it's an irreperable system we're all caged in. stuck chasing the same digital soy validation for temporary pleasure. you cannot fix an irreperable system by switching different things in the same system. it needs to be abolished. abolished by peace and waiting for Christ. we dont need politics in a life living by Christ.

 โ„–3785992[Quote]

>>3785970
That's why neoreactionaryism mogs the fuck out of ancraps, they want to preserve the monopoly on violence but make it so the state is operated on a strictly for-profit basis

 โ„–3785997[Quote]

>>3785992
explain what this ideology is

 โ„–3785998[Quote]

>>3785997
read curtis yarvin

 โ„–3786000[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (304.87 KB, 640x470) ImgOps

>>3785998
>read
no

 โ„–3786002[Quote]

>>3785998
No. YOU explain what the ideology is not ask us to read a book.

 โ„–3786004[Quote]

>>3785998
Nigga I'm not reading a whole fuckass book just to understand what some /pol/nigger is on about

 โ„–3786006[Quote]

easiest way to put it is this "retards cant be left to their own devices or theyll burn everything down" anarchy can never work but still i should be allowed to shoot you no questions asked if you walk up on my house without any reason.

 โ„–3786008[Quote]

>>3786006
The problem is that the people in power are ALSO retards

 โ„–3786010[Quote]

File: wtf.png ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (121.94 KB, 1319x1080) ImgOps

taxes are gay as fuck but i understand the purpose even if i dont think theyre going to much of anything reasonable but govt salaries 7/10 times, and thats being generous.

 โ„–3786011[Quote]

>>3786004
>>3786002
I literally just explained it, it's ancrapism but instead of pretending they want to abolish the state they openly advocate for turning it into a for-profit organization

 โ„–3786013[Quote]

File: 1782377884953z.png ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (5.27 KB, 59x85) ImgOps

/pol/ nusois haven't even read Moldbug

 โ„–3786018[Quote]

File: concerned.png ๐Ÿ“ฅ๏ธŽ (157.52 KB, 1827x1080) ImgOps

>>3786008
our federal government is actually doing really well. its local and state governments fucking off for the first time in my entire life. its crazy to see

 โ„–3786019[Quote]

>>3786013
Genuinely bizarre that people just forgot about him

 โ„–3786025[Quote]

>>3786013
i will not eat ze moldy bug

 โ„–3786027[Quote]

>>3786018
Extremely debatable but I don't have the energy to get into it right now

 โ„–3786033[Quote]

All lolberts are pedophiles

 โ„–3786042[Quote]

>>3786019
I don't think people forgot about him, you can still see millennialtroon dissidents on Xitter and Substack bring him up often, it's just that Zoomers never really had a reason to read his blog(s) since his most important ideas are arguably mainstream amongst dissidents now. I did evendoe I'm a Zoomer since I grew up in millennial Xitter and always tried to larp as being older than I am, but there's not much reason to nowadays.



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ craft ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]