[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ craft ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: Classic.PNG 📥︎ (517.57 KB, 1469x1805) ImgOps

 â„–3780426[Quote]


Would you support the Bricker Amendment? The best (in my humble opinion), most restrictive version from 1952 stipulated the following:
>forbid any treaty or executive agreement that attempted to abridge citizens' constitutional rights
>forbid treaties from placing any U.S. governmental power in foreign states or international entities
>treaties could not alter federal or state laws without explicit congressional approval
>executive orders could not be used in place of treaties and expired one year after a president's term

 â„–3780427[Quote]

So saying fuck off to the goverment?

 â„–3780436[Quote]

File: Rascal.PNG 📥︎ (204.17 KB, 1648x1609) ImgOps

>>3780427
At least the executive branch, which has spammed executive orders since the FDR administration.

 â„–3780442[Quote]

>>3780436
Well thats anti totalitarian which is good for everyone,if I was a president I would probably no

 â„–3780464[Quote]

snca

 â„–3780479[Quote]

Is this isolationistpilled? I don't get it because I'm not smart

 â„–3780494[Quote]

File: Good Old Boy.PNG 📥︎ (909.08 KB, 1352x1962) ImgOps

>>3780479
Yeah but don't put yourself down like that please.

 â„–3780526[Quote]

>>3780494
Politically, not in general
I lack media literacy

 â„–3781005[Quote]

File: Surveillance.PNG 📥︎ (385.36 KB, 1593x1664) ImgOps

>>3780526
You do?



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ craft ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]