â„–3777462[Quote]
This british is reason ehy british has been or aryan naiton with gigachad
â„–3777465[Quote]
what does this mean nigga
â„–3777468[Quote]
>>3777465Kazakhstan wined like britan over euro amerimutts
â„–3777471[Quote]
>>3777465Umlauts are those two dots over certain letters.
â„–3777474[Quote]
>>3777471You are of right
â„–3777480[Quote]
Why are umlauts not working on the sharty?
â„–3777491[Quote]
>>3777480All non-english alphabet characters are disabled for some reason.
â„–3777494[Quote]
>>3777493
Retard admin
â„–3777496[Quote]
>>3777468Most terrible idea not to have umlauts, oh well, Latin v will have to do for now.
â„–3777498[Quote]
>>3777496Isn't the Latin v just u?
â„–3777499[Quote]
>>3777492Much true, It's Germano-Altaic Gemstone to have them and Anglo-French Brimstone not to.
>>3777498Yes but can be use to replace umlaut in soyspeak.
â„–3777502[Quote]
>>3777499Oh I didn't know, but there is more than one umlaut, is the correct one just inferred from context?
â„–3777503[Quote]
>>3777502This is true and for this reason needs to be rectified.
â„–3777504[Quote]
>>3777503What do you propose?
â„–3777505[Quote]
>>3777504Umlauted o and u.
â„–3777508[Quote]
>>3777504Or better yet the same layout as /int/ or 4cuck in regard to text.
â„–3777512[Quote]
>>3777505In german for every umlaut there is a way of spelling it within the standardized english alphabet:
a = ae
o = oe
u = ue
â„–3777513[Quote]
>>3777508I dont use 4chan or /int/, what is the difference?
â„–3777516[Quote]
>>3777508That's true but with Turkic you need dotless i too. General rule for morphemes is front/front or back/back. Qazaq has central too like Mongolian but that's overcomplicating matters.
â„–3777517[Quote]
>>3777513You can use pretty much every unicode in Latin and Cyrillic script.
â„–3777520[Quote]
No OP is just aa massive slvt for xer AZN bulls