â„–3773966[Quote]
>>3773964 (OP)Hitler and Mussolini are my very best friends
Media pending approval and it never ends.
â„–3774166[Quote]
>>3773964 (OP)The guy that made the 3rd edit was Indian by the way.
â„–3774183[Quote]
>>3774166Why did xhe make it though
â„–3774194[Quote]
I like these edits but they always remind me of tccfaggots
â„–3774329[Quote]
These are good.
â„–3774334[Quote]
>>3774241The red terror and the 10000 millions christians raped were far more destructive THOUGH
the real pantied and sissyfied here were the whites
â„–3774339[Quote]
Someone do one with Hitler and 271k jews.
â„–3774395[Quote]
forgot to sage
â„–3774409[Quote]
>>3774383Not tcc try again nigger
â„–3774415[Quote]
>>3774409>mass shootings arent tccgo back pooner
â„–3774430[Quote]
go down
â„–3774470[Quote]
>>3774455who is that last person on the top row that killed 38.9k
â„–3774476[Quote]
>>3774470probably the klan
â„–3774481[Quote]
>>3774339Hitler's 6 million Jews is the only thing of effect he ever did. Otherwise he just fucked over his own nation and Europe in general. Don't try to underestimate his work by saying it was just 271
â„–3774484[Quote]
>>3774481Albeit hitler did probably prevent all of europe from being overrun by the soviets, instead only half of europe got overrun by the soviets
â„–3774535[Quote]
>>3774481Bro I wish it was 6 million too, but let's be realistic here.
â„–3774538[Quote]
>>3774481The Holocaust's death toll is a matter of debate. The commonly cited figure of 6 million Jewish deaths is based on post-war claims, but the numbers have been revised over time. Auschwitz, once said to have killed 4 million Jews, now officially reports 1.1 million total deaths (Jews and non-Jews) after forensic investigations in the 1980s and '90s. The Red Cross recorded only 271,000 concentration camp deaths across all groups during WWII. The Jewish World Almanac shows a global Jewish population increase from 15.3 to 15.7 million between 1933 and 1948-hardly evidence of genocide-scale loss. There was no mention of the Holocaust in mainstream discourse until the late '60s, suggesting its narrative may have been constructed later for political leverage rather than historical accuracy.
â„–3774540[Quote]
Did you niggers know they didn't even start talking about the holocaust until the 60s? That's a joke and a half. Make it more obvious that it's fake please.
â„–3774550[Quote]
AI
The Holocaust wasn't a household term until the 1960s. Before then, WWII was framed as an anti-Nazi war, not specifically about Jewish persecution. The Nuremberg Trials (1945-1946) focused on German aggression, not genocide. The New York Times mentioned Auschwitz only six times between 1942 and 1945-none highlighted mass Jewish killings. The word "Holocaust" itself wasn't widely used until after Hannah Arendt's 1963 book Eichmann in Jerusalem and especially after the 1967 Six-Day War, when Israel needed international sympathy to legitimize its expansionist policies. This narrative shift coincided with Zionism's rise in America-turning what was initially reported as Nazi brutality into a singular Jewish tragedy to galvanize support for Israel and cement victimhood status.