[ home / overboard ] [ bpa ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: thinking chvd.gif 📥︎ (292.31 KB, 250x250) ImgOps

 â„–3315820[Quote]

Was colonialism a benefit for white countries or did it only benefit a handful few and made savages multiply, dependent on foreign aid and becoming a bioweapon to replace white countries?

 â„–3315836[Quote]

>>3315820 (OP)
da crackas got whatt they deserve I say

 â„–3315845[Quote]

bimp

 â„–3315922[Quote]

colonizing australia, america, canada, rhodesia, new zealand, south africa and the cape colony were good.
the others sucked.

 â„–3315923[Quote]

>and becoming a bioweapon to replace white countries?
colonialism didn't cause this

 â„–3315925[Quote]

colonization was based and necessary

 â„–3315928[Quote]

They benefited from colonizing some countries but it ultimately wasnt really worth it.

 â„–3315945[Quote]

>>3315922
rhodesia and south africa were a bad investment to begin with, as they're in africa; the idea of rhodesia was that a white minority would civilize the savages, but instead, it resulted into zimbabwe
apartheid south africa tried to segregate niggers, which failed too, high birth rates and mass migration of niggers would eventually crush it

 â„–3315954[Quote]

>>3315923
colonialism brought technology, medicine, economy, food and civilization into savage lands, which resulted them in having high birth rates without letting nature take its course

 â„–3316217[Quote]

bampasii

 â„–3316229[Quote]

No, globohomism is bad in every way.

 â„–3316283[Quote]

only settler colonialism, because it essentially created more white countries. colonizing africa, india and latinxborea was a mistake because the negroes get a perfect scapegoat to blame all their failures on while also being given electricity among a thrembillion other technologies. they also get an excuse to flood into the west as "revenge" or something so together with that it was extremely bad especially in the long term.

 â„–3316304[Quote]

>>3315928
did the colonized also not gain some benefits? such as new technology, infrastructure like >>3316283 said?
however as we see now, it's backfired almost completely since african niggers are not more civilized than before

 â„–3316308[Quote]

>>3316304
Like I said, these acquired technologies only made the savages more dependent and multiply more than they can sustain.

 â„–3316323[Quote]

>>3316304
Whole reason for a colonial incentive is for land and resources doe and in my specific cases it made the heckin Netherlands into a state overflowing with economic wealth and resources because of all the heckin spices and herbs. Doe like you said in the long run they will sprout an eye for an eye incentive to flood into the colonizing country for "revenge" however this could have been sealed off with a proper nationalist society since really what could they even do if the base country flatly refused geg

 â„–3316337[Quote]

Pipo who left the home countries left because (((freemasons))) and the (((catholic church))). So its hard to be mad at them. Its bad in the sense that the people with the spirit to fight actually left their home nations, and the people who stayed were to weak to literally and spiritually defend them.


[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ bpa ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]