[ home / overboard ] [ bpa ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: intellectualpepe.png 📥︎ (855.68 KB, 1228x1214) ImgOps

 â„–3294362[Quote]

What if we had capitalism but with moral regulations

 â„–3294365[Quote]

So national socialism?

 â„–3294366[Quote]

neat, doe corporatism is a much better alternative

 â„–3294367[Quote]

File: 20260427_004133.jpg 📥︎ (262.49 KB, 700x700) ImgOps

Why are you such a sperg wrt economics when you can't make up your mind? It makes you look timmycel-ish

 â„–3294373[Quote]

File: Good_Old_boy.png 📥︎ (1.11 MB, 1352x1962) ImgOps

>>3294366
But does it work?
>>3294365
Erm nazism really wasnt as good economically as you imagine it being

 â„–3294401[Quote]

>>3294373
it worked for china, singapoer Italy, and it also worked for the nordic states before they imported a billion niggers(albeit it was neocorporatism in their case)

 â„–3294415[Quote]

File: bapepe.png 📥︎ (177.17 KB, 900x2000) ImgOps

>>3294401
China is a hellhole to live in doe.

 â„–3294458[Quote]

Up

 â„–3294487[Quote]

Only possible through coercion.

 â„–3294494[Quote]

>>3294401
Corporatism is socialist, closer to syndicalism with nationalized co-ops. That's not what Singapore did or the Nordics. China also banned unions post-Deng except the on nationalized one that doesn't get used, China also differs in how they do economic policy by region, Tibet vs Shanghai for example

 â„–3294649[Quote]

File: Dilbert.PNG 📥︎ (19.29 KB, 672x986) ImgOps

Moral regulations such as what?

 â„–3294656[Quote]

File: jed.png 📥︎ (621.43 KB, 1000x1000) ImgOps

>>3294649
No undercutting the working class, no outsourcing of labour, enviromental regulations, safe working conditions.

 â„–3294696[Quote]

File: FN Herstal.PNG 📥︎ (1.03 MB, 1489x1781) ImgOps

>>3294656
>No undercutting the working class, no outsourcing of labour, safe working conditions
Unions exist to address these concerns.
>enviromental regulations
Penalize the creation of negative externalities.

 â„–3294702[Quote]

>>3294415
China will be a hellhole irregardless of any financial system

 â„–3294861[Quote]

coal

 â„–3294863[Quote]

>>3294415
not as bad as you think

 â„–3294866[Quote]

File: Gasthekikes109.jpg 📥︎ (6.89 KB, 240x250) ImgOps

>>3294863
It really is doe.

 â„–3294869[Quote]

>>3294373
That's because national socialism wasn't prioritising stable consistent growth but specifically rapid deindustrialisation

 â„–3294871[Quote]

America already is

 â„–3294872[Quote]

>>3294869
Reindustrialization* fucking Indians messed up my autocorrect

 â„–3294876[Quote]

>>3294866
compare china before deng to after deng, it's not good but what can you expect fromk chinks it's still miles better than during mao or the qing or the republic



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ bpa ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]