>>3293732 (OP)Hey, do you know the pigmentation and have any more pictures?
At first glace he appears to be of "atlantic" or mediterranoid type. His midface is of moderate robustness and his fwhr ratio is a bit on the lower side (long midface), he appears to be mildly prognathous(?).
<I will however note that the image is a bit crude so it's a bit hard to make out details and offer a fully accurate classification.
<Prognathy itself is not an indication of african ancestry however, it is quite common among the irish:
>[T]he lips and the whole mouth region are sometimes, however, thrown into prominence by the presence of facial prognathism; this occurs in 8 per cent of the whole, while purely alveolar prognathism is found in but 2 per cent. There is a strong regional differentiation in both kinds of prognathism, however; the center of concentration is in the eastern counties, from Armagh to Waterford; facial prognathism reaches its maximum of 24 per cent in Wicklow and Carlow. It is interesting to note that the counties which show the maximum of Upper Palaeolithic features are the least prognathous of all, and that the Protestants show it more frequently, to a slight degree, than do the Catholics.And among south italians measured is the US:
>The lips vary considerably in thickness, but more fall into the thick category than in most European groups; well over a third show a visible degree of facial or alveolar prognathism.