â„–3235791[Quote]
>>3235784 (OP)Im a simple tranny. I see an anime girl, I repply
â„–3235792[Quote]
Races are like dog breeds but like we are one species o algo
â„–3235793[Quote]
>>3235791Y r ytbois like dis?
â„–3235794[Quote]
down
â„–3235796[Quote]
>>3235793blame feminisism
â„–3235809[Quote]
>>3235801Evendoe I'm a beaner from Gainesville
â„–3235825[Quote]
>>3235809lol sounds worse
â„–3235826[Quote]
>>3235784 (OP)We associate with different words than the words applied to animals
â„–3235831[Quote]
kys trarararararararanime coalskin branigger argentinian kike
â„–3235865[Quote]
>>3235784 (OP)ev&doe species can't interbreed most of the time while different human races can
â„–3235869[Quote]
>>3235865meds species interbreed all the time throughout nature
whether by chance or by humans, how could you tell?
â„–3235879[Quote]
>>3235869this is trve… but still, human races have less genetic variation between them than even subspecies. it would just be a misnomer to call them that
â„–3235894[Quote]
**and
â„–3235896[Quote]
Some retarded English language quirk
â„–3235904[Quote]
>>3235869>this is trve… but still, human races have less genetic variation between them than even subspecies. it would just be a misnomer to call them thatum…. source? not much difference is required to qualify as a subspecies sweatie. im not a animalcuck but any subspecies within fungi or plants are only a cunthair away
the only actual scientific reason why races arent subspecies is due to globalization murkying the waters. other than that setback the only reasons that remain are human arrogance and political biases
, how could you tell?
â„–3235924[Quote]
>>3235879In fact, races can be accurwtely identified with an absurdly small about of loci, at 160 you already get 99-100% classification accuracy.
Another study found that as little as 100 snps used could classify self-identified race at an accuracy of 97%.
â„–3235930[Quote]
>>3235904This, also see this poast fst data
>>3235890 â„–3235931[Quote]
**for
â„–3235946[Quote]
>>3235930We will be long dead before it would ever be recognized
there will never be "Homo sapiens subsp. nigger", let alone var. nigger
o algo
fuggen obsessed biascucks
execute anyone found guilty of political bias in science.
, how could you tell?
â„–3236023[Quote]
>>3235946>there will never be "Homo sapiens subsp. nigger"To be fair, there actually were, here's from Eickstedt
>Nordid (H. s. eu. nordicus)>Sindid (Homo sapiens sinicus)>Khoisanid (Homo sapiens hottentotus)>Sudanid (Homo sapiens niger)>Nilotid (Homo sapiens niloticus) â„–3236047[Quote]
>>3236038Trust, I'll convince them
â„–3236070[Quote]
>>3236047tell them to call mutts Homo x amerimutti o algo
it would be funny , how could you tell?
â„–3236077[Quote]
>>3236048>filipinx>pedophileI couldn't be less surprised.
â„–3236094[Quote]
>>3236087'p do not approve, how could you tell?
â„–3236095[Quote]
>>3236082Robert Sepehr is gemmy despite being jewish.
â„–3236108[Quote]
>>3236105'gate doe , how could you tell?
â„–3236114[Quote]
>>3236095She is iranian white mutt though, not jew
â„–3236141[Quote]
>>3236114No, his dad was jewish and he ran his company as a "jewish charity"