[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1772531883441w.png 📥︎ (319.83 KB, 553x679) ImgOps

 â„–3200366[Quote]

>Gun rights
>Patriarchy
>Racism
>Sexism
>Homophobia
>Tradition
>Transphobia
>Nationalism
>Colonialism
>Anti-C*mmunism
>Hierarchy
>Property rights
How is any of this bad? Can any leftist explain?

 â„–3200426[Quote]

Colonialism is the only bad thing here

 â„–3200437[Quote]

>>3200426
colonialism is bad when they mix in with whites but destroying random phonos homes is funny

 â„–3200579[Quote]

>>3200366 (OP)
marxists had some good ideas about how power operates and how it can be overthrown. i also think that real deal communists and real deal nazis are in agreement on most issues nowadays. i can't find any real faults with racism, but i think it should be done empirically and should be tied in with eugenic principles
>>3200426
>>3200437
colonialism works best when you kill all the natives and don't accommodate them. hot furry werewolves mauling natives and devouring their entrails

 â„–3200673[Quote]

>>3200366 (OP)
1. i mean this isn't so bad, i guess leftists will argue that guns kill people o algo but i don't really buy it
2. because men and women are equal in terms of intellect
3. because races are equal. now obviously black people, for example, perform much worse on important statistics (such as murders, sat scores, etc.). but much of it is due to their messed up culture and also the lack of fathers in the house, problems which the government isn't wholeheartedly fixing
4. see 2
5. this obviously hinges on your ethical standpoint (which in turn depends on your epistemological standpoint), but according to an atheist+liberal one they aren't doing anything wrong by being fags because they aren't harming anybody
6. i don't think most leftists are against this per se, just the consequences they naturally lead to (see above)
7. see 5
8. not such a bad thing, although the atheist+liberal worldview doesn't recognize nations as fundamental and thus sees (nationalist) policies that hurt the average phono in the world as bad.
9. because it's exploitative to the natives (also see above)
10. i don't think the majority of leftists are against this, but obviously commies oppose this because they are commies. i guess lots of leftists are against communist suppression because it harms the people living in those countries (at least temporarily) (see 8)
11. because according to an atheist+liberal worldview no person is fundamentally superior or inferior to one another
12. again, I don't think lots of leftists actually are against this, but for people who are for it, it's primarily about the disconnect between those who own property and those who work it (with the solution being nationalization of said property).

 â„–3200678[Quote]

>>3200437
>>3200579
"I'm for a multi-racial world in which each race keeps to itself, in harmony with the other races. Like in a garden, you have flowerbeds of roses and flowerbeds of carnations and irises and different other flowers. They don't intermarry. They stay separate, and each one has its beauty. . . . I'm against colonialism for the reason that colonialism infects the master as well as the slave. It even infects the master more." ~ Savitri Devi

 â„–3200685[Quote]

>>3200366 (OP) being mean is bad.



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]