[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: Parti Indépendantiste.PNG 📥︎ (172.14 KB, 1353x1959) ImgOps

 3195051[Quote]

Is there such a thing as "toxic masculinity" inhibiting the healthy expression of vulnerability among men, thereby indirectly promoting mtf transgenderism by classifying emotional openness as something only acceptable from females?

 3195055[Quote]

are you asking if having emotions is gay?

 3195056[Quote]

No because they transition due to autogynephilia

 3195057[Quote]

File: Gruyère - Switzerland.PNG 📥︎ (1.16 MB, 1278x2076) ImgOps

>>3195055
No.
>>3195056
Not all trannies according to Blanchard.

 3195059[Quote]

>>3195057
>Not all trannies according to Blanchard.
Whom?

 3195062[Quote]

File: Beuschel - Austria.PNG 📥︎ (700.93 KB, 1130x1706) ImgOps


 3195074[Quote]

>>3195062
That's specifically about transsexuals, not troons. Transsexual is another word for crossdresser

 3195080[Quote]

>>3195051 (OP)
personally i don't really think so, instead it's leading vulnerable men into depression and later suicide more than not

the growth of trans pipo is probably unrelated, if i were to guess it would be the general rise in acceptance for the lgbt community (which makes trans more visible, which makes more people troon out)

 3195083[Quote]

File: 1772372251237y.png 📥︎ (234.64 KB, 775x849) ImgOps

I think a lot of the talk around "toxic masculinity" is complete nonsense because both sides of the argument completely misunderstand the nature of the word masculinity (please excuse my enlightened centrist fence-sitting).

The left wing use the term incorrectly because they attribute toxicity to all aspects of manhood due to their view of an intersectional power struggle. This is nonsense. The right wing are correct to reject this, but they over-correct and say that all aspects of masculinity are positive. Or rather, they say that the word "masculinity" only applies to traits that are male and positive, meaning that all negative male traits are somehow not masculine. This is nonsense as well.

The truth is, the term "masculine" is quite broad, and does not include a moral judgement. It encompasses all male traits, of both virtue and vice. The way I see it, the proper words to use when making a moral judgement are "manly" and "mannish". Manly refers to that which is both of a man and virtuous, and mannish refers to that which is of a man and evil.

To answer your question, I think there is a proper and healthy way for a man to express his emotions, but it is very different from the way a woman ought to, and certainly not the way that a """therapist""" would advise you to. I think it has more to do with how you internally handle hardship and emotion rather than the extent to which you outwardly express it. Stoicism won btw if that matters.

 3195087[Quote]

File: Chanfana - Portugal.PNG 📥︎ (790.17 KB, 1130x1722) ImgOps

>>3195083
I agree with your assessment of the left and right's ideologically motivated oversimplification of masculinity as a concept.



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]