Most leaders are intelligent. To some degree this is necessary, but I would argue that far more valuable than an intelligent leader is a perceptive one. A leader of supreme intellect may be intellectually superior but lack the ability to base his thoughts

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
Flag
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: Giga truke.gif 📥︎ (1.37 MB, 209x255) ImgOps

Qualities in Leadership Colorado wigger dKQeJXEU [VPN] 04/11/26 (Sat) 14:27:19 №3191063 [Quote]

Most leaders are intelligent. To some degree this is necessary, but I would argue that far more valuable than an intelligent leader is a perceptive one. A leader of supreme intellect may be intellectually superior but lack the ability to base his thoughts on reality and practically apply them. He would mostly have abstract concepts of what to to do and what not to do. What is far more valuable is Perception. A perceptive leader with moderate to above average intellect will be far more capable than the former leader. Capable of integrating intellectual concepts within the present system in a practical way where to the former it can only be an abstract concept.

Baroobkek!!Vl7TbG4MyE TywUGuK2 [VPN] 04/11/26 (Sat) 14:30:46 №3191077 [Quote]

Exactly why Hitler had Reichsleiters and Napoleon was defeated o algx

Sovereign sK0Q^tat 04/11/26 (Sat) 14:33:21 №3191089 [Quote]

>Success is more important than ability
Obviously, but how can you predict success without taking ability into account.

Colorado wigger dKQeJXEU [VPN] 04/11/26 (Sat) 14:34:13 №3191093 [Quote]

>>3191089
Perception I would say better corresponds with success than intellect

Colorado wigger dKQeJXEU [VPN] 04/11/26 (Sat) 14:37:59 №3191112 [Quote]

>>3191077
Napoleon was perceptive but only about strategic matters, i believe he's lack of competent diplomacy doomed him in the end

Sovereign sK0Q^tat 04/11/26 (Sat) 14:41:07 №3191121 [Quote]

>>3191093
You're saying that perception is the application of intelligence to accomplish a real goal. Personally I would describe this as a "practicality" spectrum with Ideology and Fantasy on one end and Pragmatism on the other. Obviously it's better for a leader to exist on the pragmatic side so they can suggest specific policies. Is that essentially what you're saying? Otherwise they end up serving more as an artist inspiring a movement rather than leading it.

Baroobkek!!Vl7TbG4MyE TywUGuK2 [VPN] 04/11/26 (Sat) 14:43:49 №3191131 [Quote]

>>3191112
Sorry geg but I am referencing Waterloo. Napoleon's Marshalls cannot carry the Orders and with that the life of the Empire was crashed there