[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: IMG_8199.jpeg 📥︎ (82.34 KB, 640x804) ImgOps

 â„–3175189[Quote]

Principled socialists should oppose the petty bourgeois just as much as the big capitalists (haute bourgeois), because both are part of the larger owning class that maintains capitalism. Small business owners are no less exploitative than big business, and because they are naturally outcompeted by larger, more efficient enterprises, they are often driven to squeeze their workers even more ruthlessly. As this Jacobin Article shows: https://jacobin.com/2018/01/small-businesses-workers-wages, small enterprises offer worse working conditions. As a class the petty bourgeois are the enemies of socialism, because socialism would necessarily require them to surrender their power and capital.

To quote Pannekoek, a founder of Council Communism:

https://www.marxists.org/archive/pannekoe/1909/new-middle-class.htm

'So long as the great mass of the people were independent producers Socialism could exist only as the utopia of individual theorizers or little groups of enthusiasts; it could not be the practical program of a great class. Independent producers do not need Socialism; they do not even want to hear of it. They own their means of production and these are to them the guarantee of a livelihood. Even the sad position into which they are forced by competition with the great capitalists can hardly render them favourable to Socialism. It makes them only the more eager to become great capitalists themselves. They may wish, occasionally, to limit the freedom of competition - perhaps under the name of Socialism; but they do not want to give up their own independence or freedom of competition. So long, therefore, as there exists a strong middle class it acts as a protecting wall for the capitalists against the attacks of the workers. If the workers demand the socialization of the means of production, they find in this middle class just as bitter an opponent as in the capitalists themselves.'

 â„–3175199[Quote]

The petty bourgeoisie and fascism

As a political class it is also the petty bourgeoisie who are the early supporters of fascism and reaction. In comparison to the haute bourgeois they are first affected at any economic downturn, and the first to be affected by worker militancy; one strike could ruin them. Because of this precarious position between big business competitors and their own workers, the petty bourgeoisie forms the essential mass base for fascism. This is true today as it was a century ago. For example: small business owners represented 26% of the January 6th rioters in America, despite being only 10% of the population. Source: https://www.inc.com/inc-staff/capitol-insurrection-business-owners.html. And many small business owners supported the rise of Hitler himself! https://time.com/archive/6781610/business-finance-the-nazi-way/.

This does not mean that every small business owner is Hitler, it means the underlying mechanisms of class society make certain opinions more attractive. There very well may be socialists among the small business owners, materialist analysis doesn't negate outliers, Engels for example was a factory owner and a communist. However on a mass scale, we can see that certain classes have certain objective interests that push and pull them in different ways. As Marx said:

"Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past."
In conclusion, I want to reiterate that as a class the petty bourgeoisie are the opponents of socialism, because socialism necessarily threatens their power and the small priveliges they are afforded in capitalism. Likewise, we socialists should be enemies of the petty bourgeoisie, as we are enemies of the haute bourgeoisie, because the petty bourgeoisie has to be fought and abolished to end capitalism and class society. Whether small business or big business, it is the same social ill of capitalist business.

 â„–3175202[Quote]

im not reading that but i agree with the image because small businesses are annoying and greedy as fuck

 â„–3175206[Quote]

Why don't we just kill all non-brits and equally redistribute the resources as private property to the surviving master race. Would fix everything

 â„–3175214[Quote]

File: 77505 - SoyBooru.png 📥︎ (3.84 MB, 1600x1214) ImgOps

>Why don't we just kill all non-brits and equally redistribute the resources as private property to the surviving master race. Would fix everything



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]