[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: Freaky brenton.jpeg 📥︎ (353.44 KB, 1080x1002) ImgOps

 â„–3155751[Quote]


ITT we settle various debates on /pol/ through votes

First poll: babyjak porn debate

 â„–3155752[Quote]


Was the Montanan's ban justified?

 â„–3155753[Quote]


Was Gold's ban justified?

 â„–3155754[Quote]

File: Screenshot_20260324_142406….jpg 📥︎ (322.16 KB, 1080x1616) ImgOps

The wiki says that babyjak is underage therefore it's 'p

 â„–3155755[Quote]

>>3155754
I agree with this. The babyjak porn crisis reminds me of the exact same issues we had with 'lita

 â„–3155758[Quote]

>>3155751 (OP)
it doesnt look like a kid nor is it trying to portray a minor. i still think it doesnt belong on this site because its grey area porn though.
<
calling it 'p is insensitive to actual pedophilia

>>3155752
hes a ban evading jeet he had to go

>>3155753
i dont really like gold but his ban wasnt really that deserving

 â„–3155759[Quote]

File: 1772468158165n.jpg 📥︎ (25.07 KB, 512x507) ImgOps

oh yeah gold ban evaded today so hes never getting appealed ever again.

 â„–3155761[Quote]

>>3155758
Obviously a caricature of a drawn baby probably aint gonna look a 100% like a baby but its close enough so we should draw a line anyways.

 â„–3155762[Quote]

>>3155758
>nor is the soyjak named babyjak trying to portray a minor while it sucks on a passifier

Interesting perspective

>>3155759
I'm pretty sure he did yesterday as well. Which is kind of a dumb move on his end

 â„–3155764[Quote]

>>3155752
I don't think he should have been banned for the poast he made evendoe he acts retarded all the time.

 â„–3155766[Quote]

Doe the other things if true don't look good on paper.

 â„–3155768[Quote]

>>3155761
it will never be CLOSE to being child porn even if i dislike it or if it made my clitty leak. thats my opinion and ill firmly stand on that

>>3155762
thats like expecting cobson to be a corn on a cob with some facial hair. i remember vividly in 2024 when it was used to portray abdl rather than a child

>>3155764
he acts like a glowie and hes a retard too

 â„–3155769[Quote]


 â„–3155770[Quote]

>>3155764
I don't think him being banned over the S word or the N word is justified, however all his actions combined does present an overall favorable case as to why he was banned

 â„–3155771[Quote]

>>3155770
You mean like the ban evading and shit?

 â„–3155775[Quote]

>>3155768
No, there was actual 'p posted on the 'ru with babyjak being fully babyformed with his penis out and a penis shadow over his head.
Genuinely disgusting

 â„–3155776[Quote]

>>3155768
>it will never be CLOSE to being child porn even if i dislike it or if it made my clitty leak. thats my opinion and ill firmly stand on that

You're a retard, not towing a line early on shit like this is how communities end up with a fucked up purity spiral. Anything involving kids is not acceptable by any standard.

 â„–3155777[Quote]

>>3155771
Ban evading, voting for a pro-peedough option on a poll (which is HECKIN BAD) and because he's just an annoying nigger

 â„–3155779[Quote]

File: 160px-DOCTOSspin.gif.webp 📥︎ (51.44 KB, 160x187) ImgOps


 â„–3155780[Quote]

>>3155770
tsmt its the big picture that got him banned

>>3155771
hes been ban evading for a year hes never getting unbanned

>>3155775
never saw that and the babyjak porn i saw wasnt at all like that

>>3155776
i already stated earlier that i thought it was bad but i dont think it was csam levels of bad. it definitely shouldve never been allowed since it was just tiptoeing on the rules and it was also pornographic coal

 â„–3155781[Quote]

>>3155777
someone being annoying isn't a good reason to ban them.
But like ban evading was promoted by a lot of mods and admins like froot so not sure if its that bad.
The other shit is irony so its up to you to think its bad.

 â„–3155782[Quote]

>>3155781
he wouldve been appealed if he didnt ban evade

 â„–3155783[Quote]

File: Protectourcacas.jpg 📥︎ (284.31 KB, 750x728) ImgOps

>>3155779
I won't link it, but search for "pissluffare" on the 'ru, select my post (picrel) and look in the comments, there is an actual pornographic image of a babyformed babyjak with his penis out and a penis shadow over his head.

 â„–3155784[Quote]

>>3155780
>i already stated earlier that i thought it was bad but i dont think it was csam levels of bad. it definitely shouldve never been allowed since it was just tiptoeing on the rules and it was also pornographic coal

It doesn't need to be CSAM to be bad, its all the same shit, we should have no tolerance policy towards it.

>>3155782

Pretty sure many people have appealed and never got unbanned and therefore do ban evasion.

 â„–3155788[Quote]

>>3155787
Raped by joons

 â„–3155789[Quote]

>>3155783
i think ive seen that babyjak. i dont rly think it was that bad

>>3155784
now hold tf on. look bro, we cant just casually compare pornographic content to actual CHILD PORN. i do agree though that we shouldnt tolerate pornography in general but you are going too far
<
the people who ban evade are just impatient niggers who shouldnt use the site. ive noticed that all of the posters i dislike try evading. its a sign of low intellect

 â„–3155797[Quote]

>>3155783
Supreme should get jumped by /pol/gods

 â„–3155798[Quote]

>>3155789
>now hold tf on. look bro, we cant just casually compare pornographic content to actual CHILD PORN. i do agree though that we shouldnt tolerate pornography in general but you are going too far

I mean yes but obviously the babyjak shit was of the other illegal subsection of pornography

 â„–3155800[Quote]

>>3155797
Do dis

 â„–3155801[Quote]


 â„–3155809[Quote]

>>3155770
He is a chinnypedo

 â„–3155811[Quote]


 â„–3155812[Quote]

>>3155809
Snopes?

 â„–3155814[Quote]

>>3155753
he asked for his ban on IRC
<Golds>finocide tsmt i should die for being a pedophobe
<Golds>MissCircle can you ban me for being a pedophobe?
<Golds>Pls ban me i've been very MAPphobic today

 â„–3155816[Quote]

>>3155812
Just started using the site yesterday huh?

 â„–3155819[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage (92).png 📥︎ (4.18 MB, 2000x1600) ImgOps

>>>3155809
>Not true lmfao
>Slavcucks love to lie

 â„–3155820[Quote]


 â„–3155823[Quote]

>>3155814
informative

 â„–3155825[Quote]

>>3155814
Not ehy he was banned on the sharty, stop lying

 â„–3155827[Quote]

**why swede

 â„–3155829[Quote]

File: GiggerMoon.jpeg 📥︎ (103.03 KB, 719x508) ImgOps

>>3155814
>Accepting your fate to be banned for being too MAPphobic on a site ran by closeted pedos

 â„–3155834[Quote]

>>3155825
if you don't believe the logs, you can ask anyone else on IRC who logs the messages. if he didn't want to be banned, he wouldn't have said it so it seems like he's fine with his situation
why is he still leaking about sharty from KF is beyond me though

 â„–3155837[Quote]

>>3155834
hes leaking bc of the babyjak porn

 â„–3155838[Quote]

>>3155834
Nigger, he was banned on the sharty for soyquoting quote.

 â„–3155841[Quote]

File: 1774466650442.png 📥︎ (199.54 KB, 772x708) ImgOps

Here's his actual ban.

 â„–3155842[Quote]

>>3155841
oh so he was banned for a pedo joke

 â„–3155844[Quote]

>>3155842
Not a pedojoke nor supporting pedophilia, he soyquoted quote my shemmycuck fren.

 â„–3155845[Quote]

>>3155838
irrelevant. my point is he wanted to be banned from the sharty

 â„–3155846[Quote]

>>3155844
thats even worse. too bad hes never getting appealed

 â„–3155847[Quote]

>>3155845
Not true, please get better material cordfren.

 â„–3155852[Quote]

File: hunkyblowdiscordplane.mp4 📥︎ (1.73 MB, 560x560) ImgOps

>>>3155845 (You)
>Not true, please get better material cordfren.

 â„–3155855[Quote]

>>3155844
reread this. (1) how do you know he quoted Quote? (2) im not a shemmycuck marge

>>3155847
>irc is da cord mayne
nonsense

 â„–3155890[Quote]

You monkeys consider actual IRL children getting raped and murdered equivalent to a fat guy in a bikini with a pacifier?

 â„–3155896[Quote]

>>3155890
You're not Frieza lil cuh

 â„–3155899[Quote]

File: 1770336907331e.png 📥︎ (58.75 KB, 826x1024) ImgOps


 â„–3155907[Quote]

>>3155899
No… arrow…

 â„–3155908[Quote]

>>3155751 (OP)
Idk since I never seen it personally. I would like to point out there was zellig smut on the 'ru during the doll years and would stay on for months(not defending it obvio)

 â„–3155916[Quote]

File: Cuckjeetfail.mp4 📥︎ (6.01 MB, 720x662) ImgOps


 â„–3155918[Quote]

>>3155916
this is a classic

 â„–3155992[Quote]

File: 1773084890298m.PNG 📥︎ (19.47 KB, 500x250) ImgOps

>babyjak porn
I dont think its the same as videos of literal children being raped, but its still disgusting, creepy pedobait nonetheless, and shouldn't be allowed imo. I personally was very shocked to see it up on /soy/, when merely joking about pedophilia can get you a perma here.
>Was [namefag]'s ban deserved?
Probably not, though I dont really like most namefags here so I dont feel sorry for them.

 â„–3155993[Quote]

Babyjak has "baby" in it's name. and it also used in situations that a baby would be applicable

 â„–3156012[Quote]

>>3155907
I look like that



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]